Home > Bike Types > Mountain Bike

The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail

45 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Like a lot of kids, Lili Heim works a summer job to pay for her new bike. Unlike a lot of kids, Lili’s dad is Hans Heim, the Co-Owner and CEO of Ibis. So when Lili gets a new bikes, she’s getting a new bike, like something completely new from Ibis. Originally inspired by his daughter’s high school XC racing, Hans wanted to build a light weight carbon bike that would be versatile enough for all around riding and racing, while not being astronomically expensive.

The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail

The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail

Enter the new Ibis DV9. This 29″ wheeled hardtail has a bit of a dual personality. On one hand it can be built as a full race bike with a 100mm Step-Cast Fox fork and 29 x 2.25″ tires, or as a trail worthy build with a 120mm fork and 29 x 2.6″ tires.

The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail

Built with slacker-than-XC geometry, the DV9 features a 68.5° head tube angle with a 100mm fork or 67.4° with a 120mm fork and 439mm chainstays.

The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail

At the back you’ll find Boost 148mm dropouts and post mount rear brakes with a 180mm max rotor size.

The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail

Tire clearance tops out at 29 x 2.6″ for trail use, or go full racer with the MTB equivalent of file treads.

The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail

The frame features a threaded bottom bracket with a 1x specific design, and has the ability to run an internal dropper post. Shift cabling is run internally as well, though the brake hose is kept external.

The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail

The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail The new Ibis DV9 is a surprisingly affordable carbon hardtail

Pricing starts at $999 for the frame only, or $2199 for an NX 1×11 complete build. The sky’s the limit with XX1 Eagle builds going for $7499 or XTR for $7299. Available now.

  • Wheel Size : 29″
  • Tire Clearance: Upto 2.6″ tires
  • Front Travel : 100mm/120mm
  • Axle Width : 148mm rear / 110mm front
  • Seatpost : 31.6mm
  • Rear Brake : Post mount / 203mm max rotor
  • Chainstay : 439mm
  • Bottom Bracket: 73mm English Threaded
  • Tapered Headtube: ZS44 upper/EC49 lower
  • Max Chainring : 34T
  • Not ISCG Compatible
  • Colors: Bone White/Teal, Black/Orange
  • Sizes: Small, Medium, Large, Extra Large
  • Frame Weight : 1,204g
  • Frame Warranty : 7 Years
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

45 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shredder
Shredder
5 years ago

For the life of me I can’t figure out why these companies don’t make these type bikes with modular dropouts so they can be set up as a singlespeed. Even if it had a pressfit bb it could get an eccentric. I’d buy one today if it had either. The Santa Cruz Highball is another example. The alloy one was SS capable, but not the carbon, and they don’t make the alloy anymore. The Chameleon is more of a trail bike than an XC bike, and it’s not carbon either. Just don’t get it.

RB
RB
5 years ago
Reply to  Shredder

I believe the newest giant hardtails can be converted to SS. I think they all, or most, have sliding drop outs.

Boom
Boom
5 years ago
Reply to  Shredder

Trek Stache. You’re welcome.

Brad Comis (@BradComis)
Reply to  Shredder

Consider it from the manufacturers point of view. SS is a very small fraction of sales and to do a bike compatible with single speed means that you need special design elements that can potential compromise the function of the frame for normal derailleur use. Adjustable position dropouts that are compatible with SS and gears are heavier, more complex, less aesthetically pleasing than a dropout dedicated specifically to one drive train type. Eccentric BBs are heavier and have a higher risk of creaking or being misaligned from the factory. Obviously it’s possible to make SS specific frames, but when it comes to carbon that proposition is very difficult to support from the business side of things as those frames will require their own special molds (big $$$), testing, design time, and R&D. When that frame will only sell in very small numbers compared to a geared frame it becomes really hard for the profit on those special frames to pay for the mold costs and design time required. To do special aluminum or steel frame is a lot easier as they don’t require molds, but they still add extra SKU’s, extra testing, extra inventory overhead, etc.
Basically bike companies know that there is a small number of people out there who definitely want and love SS bikes, but more often than not the business case just isn’t there. That’s where specialty brands and niche builders come into play to fill the gaps left by the larger companies.

arp
arp
5 years ago
Reply to  Shredder

I won’t buy a hardtail that is SS compatible for the reasons mentioned by others; I don’t want the compromise, complexity, or cost.

I like what ibis has done with the target market in offering a good performing option at a more reasonable price than many other comparable bikes. For me, my full suspension trail bike is my main ride, but I like having a hardtail for the weekly races we have in the spring. Outside of that it doesn’t get ridden much. I’ll be looking hard at this to replace the cracked frame I currently have (not an ibis).

Carl
Carl
5 years ago
Reply to  Shredder

It’s not as elegant, but using a chain tensioner like the Shimano Alfine works very well for converting any bike to singlespeed. An added bonus is that if you cut the chain right you can even run it “dinglespeed” very easily without having to make extra adjustments between gears.

feldybikes
5 years ago
Reply to  Shredder

In addition to the excellent points made about, adding an eccentric or sliding dropouts adds a lot of weight. It would be at least 100g more for a steel frame to add sliding dropouts. I imagine you’d be pushing a 1/2 pound* penalty with a carbon frame that would otherwise have carbon dropouts.

*annoying unit switch to keep in the spirit of the bike industry.

feldybikes
5 years ago
Reply to  feldybikes

Sorry for the somewhat duplicative comment from what Ibis wrote below. You got me again, threaded commenting!

Iain A
Iain A
5 years ago

Hmm – $999 bucks for a hardtail frame isnt cheap but seems a good deal. $1,000 United States Dollar equals £767.12 Pound sterling today so quite how they reckon £1200 over here is beyond belief. Trump putting tarriffs on bikes now then?

Celest Greene
Celest Greene
5 years ago
Reply to  Iain A

Think of the US price as excluding vat (sales taxes are never included in US msrp). Adding it back in would put you just under GBP1000.

Ayyggss
Ayyggss
5 years ago

because minimal people run single speed and those that do are usually steel snobs

bigelow1261
5 years ago
Reply to  Ayyggss

Assumptions tend to prove false. Agree there aren’t a lot of ss’s out there I do notice just as many carbon frame as steel

Put a Lefty on it
Put a Lefty on it
5 years ago
Reply to  bigelow1261

I’m building this into a SS. Ordered the day it was released! I also ordered a Lefty for it.

Matt L
Matt L
5 years ago

Put a Lefty on it,
How are you going to set it up SS?
I am digging everything about this frame and if I can get it SS that would seal the deal.
Thanks,
Matt

Saris@Ibis
Saris@Ibis
5 years ago

Hey @Shredder. Our last hardtail had a modular design. You could remove the rear end for travel, set it up with a gates belt drive, or single speed it. You could even replace the rear triangle and set it up as a fat bike.

It was awesome….and we had a dozen super stoked customers who did all the things I mentioned above. Most people? They rode their bikes setup normally.

With this bike, Hans was pushing to create something affordable. The frame retails for just $250 more than the aluminum Chameleon you mentioned. Retaining the old “slot machine” system or designing a new modular system would have added complexity, increased the weight of the frame, and increased the cost.

JMAN
JMAN
5 years ago
Reply to  Saris@Ibis

Very nice to see a manufacturer respond with additional details. We’ll done.

dockboy
dockboy
5 years ago
Reply to  Saris@Ibis

Saris, thanks for not continuing to use the insensitive name you had for your previous (cool) hardtail. I know it wouldn’t even apply here, but it was in pretty poor taste. I have no idea what DV9 means, but that’s okay for now.

Slacker
Slacker
5 years ago
Reply to  dockboy

Really, it was a bike not a political statement. PC sucks

dockboy
dockboy
5 years ago
Reply to  Slacker

Slacker, its name is a derogatory term. PC sucks if you’re privileged enough to avoid the impact of the hateful slurs. Congrats to you, I guess.

Record11carbon
Record11carbon
5 years ago
Reply to  dockboy

(deleted)

pm732
5 years ago
Reply to  dockboy

(deleted)

Record11Carbon
Record11Carbon
5 years ago
Reply to  dockboy

So, please, when I fire someone at work for being a “Slacker”, they, bu definition are in your mind a protected (victim) class?

(deleted)

JBikes
JBikes
5 years ago
Reply to  Record11Carbon

So you see no difference between the word “slacker” and the word “tranny”.
The latter is almost universally considered a slur, although, it is used within certain groups, kinda like the “n” word.

Is anyone affected by not continuing the name “tranny”?

Start your own bike company and you can name things on principal all you want.

record11
record11
5 years ago
Reply to  JBikes

No…sticks and stones…wait, is that mean too? Stones and sticks can be weapons…weapons are bad…..

Padrote
Padrote
5 years ago
Reply to  record11

Is being willfully ignorant entertaining?

Bryan
Bryan
5 years ago
Reply to  dockboy

Privileged enough to avoid the impact of hateful slurs? Slacker is now on the PC list of ‘words thou shalt not utter”? SMH, idiot snowflake.

Saris@Ibis
Saris@Ibis
5 years ago
Reply to  dockboy

Hi @Dockboy, thanks for the kind words! The previous name was unintentionally hurtful and for that, we offer a sincere apology. One of our core values as a company is to be inclusive.

The new name is an abbreviation for Development. The bike was built as a development bike for NICA kids. That idea dictated our approach to geometry, build kits, and our entry level price points.

Oh, and the 9 stands for the wheel size

Diego
Diego
5 years ago
Reply to  Saris@Ibis

I got an Ibis titanium quill stem from the early 90s some weeks ago. It is such a beautiful piece, with so much atention to details that my respect for Ibis began to grow.

It does not surprise me if somebody in that company thought that some brands are asking for stupid amounts of money for carbon frames that did not demanded an insane amount of money to be developed and made.

That said I find this new bike spot on for me in so many aspects. Only sugestion I would like to do is, that I would like to have a fox 34 stepcast as an option for all the build kits.
Warm Regards!

Bob Fawson
5 years ago
Reply to  Saris@Ibis

I run my current Ibis hardtail both geared and single speed. Looked at the trans-fat conversion too, but it didn’t offer clearance for sufficiently big tires. I’ll miss the modular design when it’s time to upgrade! Also rocking the original 941 wheels!

i
i
5 years ago

Pretty nice looking bike for a child or someone very short. The reach on the XL is suitable for someone, what 5’6 or so? Or someone stuck in the 80s ideas of bike fit. Can you even get the 150mm stem anymore that would be required for such a tiny frame?

Like most of Ibis’ offerings, it’s close but not quite there.

JBikes
JBikes
5 years ago
Reply to  i

Seems inline with other current offering when equipped with a 100mm fork. It seems like a race bike first and foremost, while providing a little more clearance for versatility. Doesn’t seem like it was meant to be a trail/aggressive hardtail.

John Royal
John Royal
5 years ago
Reply to  JBikes

JBikes gets it, you don’t need a meter-long reach when the frame has a 72-73 degree seat angle. The effective top tube lengths are right in line with most other frames out there.

Riding_in_the_Mtns
Riding_in_the_Mtns
5 years ago

I was really stoked on the bike till I saw that the seat tube angle was 73 degrees. 🙁
After many years of riding slack seat tube angled bikes versus the last couple of years of riding steeper angles of around 75 and above I definitely think 75 and above is the way to go.

pm732
5 years ago

are these on the roadmap to be produced state side at that pricepoint?

silverlining
silverlining
5 years ago

It’s almost 2019 and I’m staring at an externally routed brake line on a brand new carbon hard tail frame. Why.

Brendan
Brendan
5 years ago
Reply to  silverlining

silverlining, do you actually prefer the brake hose routed internally? Also, do you work on your own bikes? I hope this doesn’t come off snarky – I’m genuinely curious.

silverlining
silverlining
5 years ago
Reply to  Brendan

Yes. And yes.

JBikes
JBikes
5 years ago
Reply to  silverlining

Because the predominant reason internal routing exists is aerodynamics. That’s not to important on a mtb hardtail. Its the one instance where road bike “tech” is getting into mountain bike scene based on the perception that its better because high end road bikes have it, and high end road bike exclusively use the best designs (circular logic)

Downsides:
– maintenance difficulty
– travel difficulty (hard to remove bars/forks and repackage with internal routing.
– often suboptimal routing path for better shifting (electronic mitigates this and I prefer wiring to be internal)
– frame ingress points for water/debris.
– small plastic port grommets that eventually fail, after 5+ yrs, may be hard to get.

About the only argument one can make for mtb’s is looks, use with electronic drivetrains and need to route around suspension components when no other path can be found

Dylan Sutton
Dylan Sutton
5 years ago
Reply to  JBikes

I get the objection to internal cabling (because cables and housing need semi-regular replacement to keep running nicely), but why for hydraulic brake hoses? I’ve been running hydraulic brakes for 15 years, and never had to replace a hose. A bleed every couple of years is the most maintenance I’ve had to do, even running old Avids and Hayes with DOT fluid.
I can’t say I’ve found transport an issue either, I’ve always got away with just taking the bar off but worst case scenario on an MTB you could pull the shifters and brake levers right off the bar, it’s not like the cables would be running under bar tape.

Easier to clean is also an argument that could be made for internal routing on an MTB, though given my bike is caked in three weekends’ worth of mud I’ll stay away from that one 🙂

JBikes
JBikes
5 years ago
Reply to  Dylan Sutton

Yeah, i mistakenly confused my road bike issue with my mtb…which has no under the tape routing. And I’ve never replaced a hydraulic hose over the same time period

Woody
Woody
5 years ago

It’s short by modern standards – I could ride the large with dropbars and a 70mm stem

Rekt23
Rekt23
5 years ago

Why is no one bringing up the 4 pot deore(?) level disc brake?

Tyler
Tyler
5 years ago
Reply to  Rekt23

Woah, good spot.

TimE
TimE
5 years ago

NIce. This hardtail hits the spot. Pity its not available in 650B version

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.