Home > Reviews > Component Reviews

New Race Face Chester Pedals Spread Out the Pins and Dump the Hump

Race Face Chester pedals, SF climbing
6 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

When I first heard of composite flat pedals, I was skeptical that they would be tough enough for MTB. After riding several sets, including the updated Race Face Chester pedals, I’m convinced you’d have to do something severe to catastrophically damage a composite pedal body. They are tough enough, and they’re lightweight and inexpensive!

For complete details on the updated Chester pedals, check out Bikerumor’s launch article from last summer. In short, the Chesters are Nylon composite pedals that come in small or large size options. Their updated design aims to provide better traction than the older model, and a flatter feel without a hump over the axle. I’ve been riding the Chesters for several weeks now, and I’m pretty pleased with their platform shape, grip, and durability.

Race Face Chester Pedals – Key Specs:

Race Face Chester pedal, on bike

The new Chester pedal bodies are made from a durable Nylon composite. The body shape was redesigned for “a sleeker look and improved feel” over the outgoing version, and I’d agree they look more streamlined.

Based on my preference for larger-bodied pedals I opted to test the large Chesters. They measure 115mm long, 110mm wide and 16mm thick. Race Face really wanted to eliminate the hump over the axle the older Chester pedals had. While a minor hump is still visible on each end of the axle, it’s been flattened right down in the middle.  

Race Face Chester pedals, pair

These pedals feature 11 pins per side – Nine replaceable metal pins and two molded pins. Race Face says they improved the pin placement over the last Chester pedal, to offer better grip and easy foot repositioning. The new pedal’s pins are definitely spread out over a larger area than the old version.

Rotating on a chromoly spindle, the Chester’s internals are serviceable and rebuildable. Race Face also eliminated the wrench flats from the older model’s spindles to give the new Chesters a reduced Q-Factor.

Race Face Chester pedals, on scale

The large Chester pedals are pretty lightweight at 358g, especially given their generous platform. Race Face claims 355g, which is close enough for me to call honest!

Ride Impressions – Shape and Feel:

Race Face Chester pedals, SF, rock ledge

I’ve been riding the Chesters for several weeks now, first on the Devinci Troy I recently reviewed and later on my own Knolly Chilcotin.

I wear size 9.5 shoes, and I find the large Chester pedals’ width is easily adequate. The only thing I prefer about more square shaped pedals is they offer more side-to-side support when your foot bounces out of position. With the Chesters, you’re perfectly well supported when your foot is planted correctly, but their tapered shape offers less room for error if your foot shifts outwards.

However, the Chester’s shape provides a ton of platform front-to-back. This pedal feels very supportive and comfortable under hard pedalling, and they’re definitely not going to give you the ‘crow’s foot’ feeling. At 16mm they’re not the slimmest pedal out there, but only by a few millimeters. The Chesters keep your feet pretty close to the spindles and don’t feel blocky or thick.  

Race Face Chester pedal, side view

At Crankworx, Race Face’s sales rep told me one priority with the Chester’s updated design was to minimize the old version’s hump over the axle. A look at the pedal shows there is now only a slight bulge at either end of the axle, and the middle is dead flat. I’d say their slimming accomplished the goal; I don’t find the slight humps noticeable at all.

The metal pins on the Chesters are longer than the molded pins, and they sit higher than the pedal body’s middle section. This allows your feet to sink in and gives the Chesters a slightly concave feel.

Traction:

Race Face Chester pedals, SF, TOP rock line
Traction was good with either shoe, but in rough patches like this, the Chester pedals gripped my Endura MT500 shoes very nicely.

I rode two different pairs of shoes with the Chesters; Crankbrothers Stamp Trails and Endura MT500s. I started out riding the Stamp Trail shoes and found I had good grip, but nothing I’d call super grabby. It wasn’t hard to adjust my foot position, and my foot did get bounced off the pedal once or twice on rough trails.

Race Face Chester pedal, on shoe

The Chesters seem to grip the Endura MT500 shoes more forcefully. These shoes immediately felt more solidly stuck to the pedals than the Crankbrothers, and it takes a bit more effort to re-position them. The MT500’s triangular middle lugs (vs the rectangular Stamp Trail tread pattern) definitely stick better on the Chester’s pins. I preferred the grippier feel of these shoes, especially on rough trails where my feet stayed locked in position better.

Durability:

Race Face Chester pedal, dirty

Due to my Knolly’s low bottom bracket, the Chesters have suffered their fair share of pedal strikes! Despite this, the worst damage I have inflicted was flattening one of the molded pins on one pedal. Otherwise, both have nothing more to show than small scratches on the outside edges. Two of the metal pins appear to have taken hits, but all of them are still straight and fully intact. Should you mangle or break one, the Chesters’ bottom-loading pins should remain easy to remove.

I haven’t been beating on the Chesters for too long but they have been put through wet and muddy fall conditions. So far I’ve had no mechanical issues with the internals, and the spindles are still straight.

Race Face’s updated Chester pedals retail for $55, and are available in eight different colors.

raceface.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Will
Will
30 days ago

Wait, when you “first heard of” composite flat pedals? They’ve been the gold standard in street bmx for probably going on 35 years, which arguably exacts more abuse on pedals and parts in general than most MTB (rock strikes? Try intentionally grinding your pedals over a jagged ledge for 50 ft then doing it again? How about yard sale-ing your entire bike down a set of stairs? ). Apart from MTB flats having replaceable metal pins and hence better grip, I don’t see why a plastic flat body wouldn’t* work in an MTB application. They aren’t going to last as long as a $2-300 alloy pedal but at ~$40-60, who cares?

Great looking pedals btw

Dave
Dave
16 days ago
Reply to  Will

I’m curious, what $200-$300 alloy pedals are you talking about?

Last edited 16 days ago by Dave
Michael Schafer
Michael Schafer
29 days ago

Snapped my Chester composite in half in Sedona. It’s pretty sever. Get an aluminum pedal. Half a pedal is hard to pedal.

King County
King County
28 days ago
John
John
23 days ago

I run metal pedals on my main bike because I go to bike parks, I run composite on a few other bikes in family.

Friendly reminder to service your pedals on occasion,

Tarv
Tarv
2 hours ago

No side by side comparison photo?

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.