Home > Bike Types > eBike

The All New Santa Cruz Vala Uses Four-Bar Suspension, Not VPP

Santa Cruz Vala ebike
7 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Santa Cruz has just dropped a new eMTB, and it’s probably not what you expect. At first glance, it looks like a Santa Cruz, but then you start to realize something is different… like the lack of VPP!

Yup, following in the footsteps of the Santa Cruz Blur, the new Vala abandons VPP in favor of a more traditional four-bar design. Why? According to Santa Cruz, it all comes down to motor packaging and making their “best handling ebike” yet.

The Santa Cruz Vala is a full power ebike, meaning it has a (relatively) large Bosch Performance Line CX motor to mount to the frame. This latest generation full power motor with 600 watts of peak power and 85nm of max torque was just launched, and while quieter than ever, it still takes some consideration to fit into the frame. For Santa Cruz, the motor housing would be in the way of the ideal pivot placement for VPP, so they decided to look into a new design that would give them “the freedom to make all the right spec and kinematic choices.”

Four-bar suspension designs have been around forever for a reason, and Santa Cruz states they were able to improve anti-squat figures while maintaining the ideal amount of anti-rise while also decreasing the leverage ratio for better damping and consistency on long decent. The frame also has a progression flip chip independent of the geo flip chip which allows for 26-29% progression. The Vala offers 150mm of rear travel and is paired with 160mm travel suspension forks.

In terms of ebike system packaging, Santa Cruz also went with a 600Wh internal fixed battery in order to reduce the size of the downtube. They point out that the next size up, the 800Wh battery, adds 2.2lbs so most riders will be happier on the 600Wh battery that suits their needs. If you do need more range, the 250Wh PowerMore range extender is an option that adds 3.3lbs and is available aftermarket.

The suspension layout and frame design also allows for an added 110mm of insertion depth with Valas coming with the longest dropper posts for SC yet. Medium will spec with 180mm travel posts, while larges will come with 210mm.

All Valas will be sold as MX wheel bikes with a 29″ wheel in front and 27.5 in back, which they say offers better handling for ebikes to counteract the extra weight of the battery. Frames have a maximum tire width of 27.5 x 2.5″, and use Boost 148mm spacing and post mount brakes for 200mm rotors.

Designed with durability and ease of service in mind, the frames use 5mm Allen key fittings on all pivots, and the main pivots use preloading collet axles with expanding wedges to prevent them from backing out. You’ll also find bigger ball bearings, a one piece forged shock link, captive Geo flip chip hardware, and four oversized bearings at the chain stay pivots with an axle to hold the pieces captive.

Additional frame details include a tool mount under the top tube, and a display on the top tube that connects wirelessly to the mode switch on the bars.

Geometry

The Vala will be offered in five sizes, from SM to XXL. The Geo adjust chip Ofers hi/lo settings that will adjust the BB height by 4mm and the head tube angle by 0.3º.

Build Kits and Pricing

Complete builds start with the R spec at $7,299 and top out at $12,799 for the XX AXS RSV build. All builds include the new Schwalbe Magic Mary Radial casing tires, and SRAM brakes (Maven on S and above). Lower builds use the C carbon frames, while XO AXS RSV and above get CC.

Claimed weights range from 47.33lbs for the XX AXS RSV build, to 49.49lbs for the R build.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
nooner
nooner
1 month ago

After years of talking smack on semi active solid rear triangle (SRT) designs like VPP, DW, it feels GREAT to be vindicated! Well done Santa Cruz! Power to the people.

Grillis
Grillis
1 month ago
Reply to  nooner

How are you vindicated by a design change that was required to accommodate a motor?

Tom
Tom
1 month ago
Reply to  Grillis

well, the fact that they were able to get the kinematics they wanted in spite of the presence of the motor indicates they very likely could have done so without the motor there. I had an old Santa Cruz VPP bike, and I didn’t love it. More than one way to skin a cat, even without a fancy trademarked technical jargon.

Grillis
Grillis
1 month ago
Reply to  Tom

Of course they could have done it without the motor, but that’s not the point now is it.

Tom
Tom
1 month ago
Reply to  Grillis

uhh, that’s exactly the point. To put it another way, they’ve sold VPP as a feature, for which you’ve paid extra. Only to later decide that a generic 4 link could accomplish the same thing. Which one do you believe?

Tom Wenzel
1 month ago

Disney gets to hold on to Mickey Mouse IP indefinitely (because of friends in high places: Congress), whereas Specialized had to relinquish the FSR patent after a 20-year ride. Mike should’ve befriended Norm Mineta a little bit more…

Jon
Jon
1 month ago
Reply to  Tom Wenzel

Copyright protections for things like books, music, movies, Disney characters, and properties like that are very different than patent protections that cover mechanical inventions. Copyright protections were extended to around 120 years back in 1978 while patents typically last about 20 years. The whole purpose of the patent system is to encourage innovation by protecting the inventor’s rights for a limited time. With a patent, you don’t get unlimited protection so you have to continue to innovate instead of just blocking everyone forever.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.