Home > Bike Components > Drivetrain

Reinventing the Chainring? Discussing the Spreng Reng Project with Doug Brown Jr.

Spreng Reng overlay
60 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

When it comes to drivetrain innovation, it’s easy to assume the big players have it all figured out. Oval rings, narrow-wide teeth, optimized offsets—it feels like every shape has been tried. But every so often, someone outside the mainstream takes a shot at rethinking the fundamentals. That’s where Doug Brown Jr. steps in with his Spreng Reng project.

Spreng Reng design:patent drawing
(Photo/ Spreng Reng)

This is no garage-only experiment. Doug has secured patents in the U.S. and Europe, has years of prototypes behind him, and some very real test data pointing to a new way of turning watts into speed. We tested some of his earlier work, and now that he’s refining his design, we thought it would be the perfect time for an interview. I connected with Doug to discuss his invention, its origins, and why he believes the Spreng Reng might be the first chainring in 140 years to truly improve on the circle.

What is the Spreng Reng?

The Spreng Reng chainring stands out for its patented quasi-hexagonal shape, a design registered in both the U.S. and Europe. Unlike traditional oval rings that only improve efficiency through the dead spots of the pedal stroke, the Spreng Reng claims to enhance performance within the power stroke itself. This unique geometry reportedly achieves a 50% reduction in friction from chain-link stiction, a 50% intermittent reduction in articulation friction, and a net torque increase without compromising gear speed. On the bike, that translates into a smoother, more fluid pedal stroke and an easier cadence on climbs, all with no adaptation period required.

Real-world testing backs up those claims: Hunter Allen of Peaks Coaching Group recorded a 26-watt gain and a 5% faster climb using a 36T Spreng Reng compared to a 34T round ring. Developed since 2016 through multiple prototypes, the current version represents what creator Doug Brown Jr. calls the “final” iteration. While it’s optimized for climbing, the design’s potential spans road, gravel, and MTB applications, and even Hour Record pursuits.

Early Spreng Reng set up 1x (Photo/ BikeRumor)

Brown’s ultimate goal? To license the technology to a major groupset manufacturer, bringing this performance-focused innovation to a broader market. It’s a very interesting idea, and having tried the newest Spreng Reng, we can safely say the ring has a unique feel; if it were available to the masses, it could be an option for those who struggle with climbing or are looking to optimize their form.

We decided to sit down with Doug Brown Jr. and discuss what could be the next big thing for going uphill – enjoy!

Spreng Reng 36T proto
(Photo/ Spreng Reng)

Speng Reng | BikeRumor

BikeRumor (BR): Who are you and what is the Spreng Reng?
Doug Brown Jr. (DBJr):
I’m just an avid cyclist, beginning in 2008. The current Spreng Reng is the second iteration of a unique, patented chainring design that originated from an earlier asymmetric version featured by you at BikeRumor years ago. That first version helped me climb with a smoother cadence, but this new one is on another level—it’s quasi-hexagonal in shape, so unique that there isn’t even a proper geometric name for it. Our first true hexagon prototype rode horribly, but rounding the vertices made it smooth and powerful.

BR: What’s your background—engineering, design?
DBJr:
None of that. My past life was circulation director and marketing for a national TV program guide. No mechanical engineering background, just what I’d call a real-world education in chainring design. The project began in 2016 after I read a short VeloNews article by Coach Trevor Connor about climbing cadence. That one-pager set me off chasing the idea that increasing cadence could unlock climbing performance. Spin to win.

BR: So what problem were you trying to solve?
DBJr:
Honestly? I wanted to climb better. I had this strange desire to make climbing easier by enhancing cadence, and that’s where Spreng Reng started.

Spreng Reng design:patent drawing for 36t
40T patent drawings of the Speng Reng (Photo/ Spreng Reng)

BR: How does it actually work compared to other non-round chainrings?
DBJr:
The biggest thing—and I can’t stress this enough—is that Spreng Reng improves the power stroke, not just the dead spots. It cuts chain link stiction and articulation friction by 50% inside the stroke, and it adds net torque without sacrificing gear speed. Other non-round rings only help in the dead zone, and they often make the power stroke harder. The Spreng Reng flips that logic.

BR: Does it still use your old asymmetric idea?
DBJr:
No, the current version is a complete redesign. Totally different shape and totally different performance benefits.

BR: Can riders use it every day? Or just for special events?
DBJr:
It’s daily-ride ready. Like the first version, there’s no adaptation period. You just bolt it on and climb faster.

BR: Do you have power data to back this up?
DBJr: Yes. Hunter Allen from Peaks Coaching Group and Wayne Stetina have thoroughly tested it. Hunter saw a 26-watt increase, higher cadence, and cut 1:21 off a 28:15 climb using a 36-tooth Spreng Reng versus a 34-tooth circular ring. Wayne found similar benefits and helped refine mounting orientation. The Silverstone Sports Engineering Hub is also conducting lab tests using its unique efficiency rig.

Early Spreng Reng Samples (Photo/ Zach Overholt)

BR: How many prototypes are we talking here?
DBJr:
A lot. We’ve gone through multiple shapes, profiles, and orientations to get the smoothest pedal stroke. The current one we’re testing now is as good as it gets—I don’t think there’s much wiggle room left in chainring design.

Tour de France 2023 - 110th Edition - 4th stage Dax - Nogaro 182 km - 04/07/2023 - Bahrain - Victorious - photo Luca Bettini/SprintCyclingAgency©2023
Could one of these teams be on the rengs already? (Photo Luca Bettini/SprintCyclingAgency©2023)

Are Spreng Rengs Already in the Pro Peloton?

BR: Are professional riders using these?
DBJr:
Yes, but I can’t disclose names. It’s tough to get a WorldTour team to test anything not handed to them by a major drivetrain brand. But persistence has gotten me in some doors.

BR: Could the UCI step in if it proves too advantageous?
DBJr:
Unlikely, as long as the rings are commercially available within a set period. That rule exists to keep tech open and prevent one team from hoarding an advantage.

BR: How is Spreng Reng different from other non-round rings that failed in the past?
DBJr:
The difference is simple: this one actually improves performance in the power stroke. I’ve ridden all the others. They never felt faster—just weird. Spreng Reng feels smoother, easier, and genuinely faster uphill.

Spreng Reng early proto
(Photo/ Spreng Reng)

BR: Why only an inner ring?
DBJr:
We did prototype a 50-tooth quasi-octagonal version, and it worked fine. In fact, I think it could help with records like the Hour Record because of the efficiency gains. But climbing is where this design shines the most. And yes, it could easily slot into 1x setups where mechanical advantage is lost compared to a 2x setup.

BR: Manufacturing—how are you making these?
DB Jr: Initial steel prototypes were sourced from Tri-City Laser, and the 7075 aluminum finals were produced by ProtoLabs. We’ve done 34, 35, 36, 38, and 40-tooth versions so far, plus the 50T. The patent covers a wide range of polygonal designs, starting at six sides, providing flexibility.

BR: Any warranty or crank compatibility issues?
DBJr:
Not that we’ve seen. Shifting has been fine, no biomechanical issues either. Just bolt it on and ride.

Early Spreng Reng Sample (Photo/ BikeRumor)

BR: Is there Gravel and MTB potential?
DBJr:
Definitely. No reason it wouldn’t work in those disciplines. The efficiency gains are applicable across various terrains, but climbing is where they truly shine.

BR: What’s the end game here?
DBJr:
Ideally, license the patent to a groupset manufacturer. It’s most valuable when coupled with an entire drivetrain. But if that doesn’t happen, I’ll go direct-to-market with a website.

BR: Final word?
DBJr:
After years of prototypes, testing, and study, I believe it’s impossible for this design not to provide a climbing benefit. The question isn’t if it works, but how much. The Silverstone testing should provide an answer soon.

Will we see the Spreg Reng at any events soon? After only one day of testing with a 36-tooth Spreng Reng, British Hill Climb National Champion Harry MacFarlane has decided to use a 38-tooth Spreng Reng during his hill climb title defense on Sunday, October 26.

Hunt Hill Climb SL Disc ultralight carbon tubular road bike wheelset, The Struggle is real
British Hill Climb Championship (Photo/ Hunt Wheels)

What Next For Spreng?

The Spreng Reng isn’t a marketing gimmick or a tweak on oval rings. It’s an entirely new approach, one born from curiosity and stubborn persistence. Doug Brown Jr. might not have the weight of a drivetrain giant behind him, but his chainring is doing something the industry hasn’t managed in more than a century: making the circle obsolete, at least when the road points uphill.

Whether the Spreng Reng becomes the next big performance upgrade or remains an underground curiosity, it’s a reminder of where innovation often comes from: one rider, one idea, and an obsession with making bikes faster.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

60 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The potato
The potato
1 month ago

Bring it on! The sooner the better

Doc Sarvis
Doc Sarvis
1 month ago

Odd that you need to say Doug Brown Jr. every time.

Balderdash
Balderdash
1 month ago
Reply to  Doc Sarvis

Maybe that is just what he prefers to be called.

Howard
Howard
1 month ago
Reply to  Doc Sarvis

His riding buddies call him DOUGY!

chainbang
chainbang
1 month ago

26 watt increase is impressive, same thing happened when I rotated my hoods in on my 33cm drop bars!

Ovaltine Brand Police
Ovaltine Brand Police
1 month ago
Reply to  chainbang

Now get some 154mm cranks and 31mm tyres
and you’ll be first at the cake stop.

Last edited 1 month ago by Ovaltine Brand Police
Andrew
Andrew
1 month ago

I can’t see how this scientifically makes any sense, but I’ll try to reserve judgement for now. I wonder if they’re suggesting that the benefit is Mechanical, or Biomechanical? Surely not all of the gains are from the chain articulation changes mentioned? I wonder why they tested the 36T vs a 34T Round (and not a 36T round) ?

Kyle
Kyle
1 month ago
Reply to  Andrew

Modern drivetrains are like 95% efficient. You’d have to be pushing 500W and this be 100% efficient for mechanical gains to be the source. But yes, a larger ring will be more efficient generally.

The 26W seems.. anecdotal? 26W is within the realm of a good day vs a bad day and the climb time is subject to so many other variables. It seems very strange to not have substantial lab testing prior to marketing.

Astro_Kraken
Astro_Kraken
1 month ago
Reply to  Kyle

Yeah you’d need to compare more data points. Right now maybe he just pedaled 26w harder. More power=faster isn’t exactly news.

That said, I hope this is awesome. Hills keep getting steeper.

Martin Navarre
Martin Navarre
1 month ago
Reply to  Astro_Kraken

my thought too. It seems the test was equivalent to shifting from a 34t to 36t … of course you would push more watts and go faster. I think it would need to be tested on a longer climb and beginning + middle + end of a long ride … and control for heart rate. Then you have evidence that it’s biomechanically better – more watts, same HR, less fatigue

Veganpotter
Veganpotter
1 month ago
Reply to  Kyle

Or you only try when you’re using your own chainrings.

TimE
TimE
1 month ago
Reply to  Kyle

because it’s all BS thats why

WheelNut
WheelNut
1 month ago

Notice there is no explanation about how or why this reduces friction. The only data provided is that one test was done on a hill climb and it was supposedly faster. No data from the “friction test.” Until they can explain how it works I’ll assume it doesn’t work and this is just another junk idea preying upon the ignorant.

Jason
Jason
1 month ago

Why does Doug send prototype CRs to journalists claiming they are tested and proven faster but then not have the test findings ready?

Also is this a condemnation of his previous non round rings?
I’ve ridden all the others. They never felt faster—just weird. Spreng Reng feels smoother, easier, and genuinely faster uphill.”

Robin
Robin
1 month ago

Hunter Allen’s comments are interesting, but his “results” may have been affected by bias and other factors. If there are real results to be had, those should show up in testing involving multiple chainrings of all sorts and large sample sets. It’s worth noting that big claims about elliptical chain rings have been made by manufacturers and riders throughout the years. Meanwhile, lots of testing has shown no clear evidence of any performance gain.

That 26W gain from the chain ring alone definitely needs to proven with a robust set of data, actual lab data and data from a lot of riders, not just one or two riders at Silverstone.

The claims merit significant skepticism.

Jordan Villella
Jordan Villella
1 month ago
Reply to  Robin

I agree – some rock solid proof with lots of data sets will be the best. Hoping he get the results he wants but…. It’s a tough sell

Pete
Pete
1 month ago

You don’t need any stinkin’ data. For every lesser bend of the chain, there is an equal greater bend at the other locations on the circumference. = by definition no less friction on the chain itself.
Capish?

Ululu
Ululu
1 month ago
Reply to  Jason

Yeah, I couldn’t care less about “Spreng Reng feels … genuinely faster uphill”. I only want to know whether they ARE faster.

Last edited 1 month ago by Ululu
Evan
Evan
1 month ago
Reply to  WheelNut

Also pretty ambiguous how this is only useful for climbing. I’ll take 26 bonus watts on the flats too please.

Matthias
Matthias
1 month ago

26 W is absolutely massive. So massive in fact that I’m inclined to call it absolutely made up, especially in the absence of any explanation whatsoever *why* it would result in any less stiction or whatever. Unlike other “weird” designs like oval rings where it’s easy to see why they can, depending on your pedalling style, bring a modest gain that nobody claims was anywhere near as big.

john
john
1 month ago

Thanks Jordan, great little story! Why not. Stranger things have happened.

Seth
Seth
1 month ago

Looks like the SR OvalTech Chainring, I rode one years ago, you can find them on ebay for 12 bucks.

Veso Mandaric
Veso Mandaric
1 month ago

I remember the day, Interbike Anaheim, when Pong was standing on the chair (“borrowed from Security Guy) swinging the crank in his hand, yelling:
This is the best crank ever, this is Magic Motorcycles crank, better, lighter, stronger. It is CNC made, not cheep forging.
Buy, people, buy, only $899. ONLY TODAY Reserve your sample NOW
And, People were lining up, giving cash.
CASH CASH CASH Pong was happy, he got mucho dinero QUICKLY
Then, his cranks failed, shit happens, Pong disappeared in oblivion.
New Circus come to town. Called Junior.

Greg
Greg
1 month ago
Reply to  Veso Mandaric

Weren’t they around $500? And then Cannondale bought their IP, evolved the design, came out with the Si crankset (then the SiSL and then the SiSL2).

Exodux
1 month ago
Reply to  Veso Mandaric

Actually Pong’s cranks didn’t disappear, Cannondale bought the design and manufactured their own cranks based off Pong’s design.

DOUG
DOUG
1 month ago

OK, please allow me to update and clarify a few things about the Spreng Reng article. First, and most importantly, based upon the test results from Silverstone Sports Engineering Hub I was wrong in my analysis of where the performance increase is coming from. Based upon their test results it is not mechanical efficiency in nature. This does not change the fact that it performs better than circular, particularly when climbing. It just means there is another explanation for the increased performance we have experienced. The explanation I had put forth to Jordan for the article is now incorrect. I believe the correct explanation was first mentioned some time ago by Wayne Stetina, a cycling veteran with over 30 years in the industry, a former US Olympian, and still an avid cyclist at 71, who has spent a lot of time riding with Spreng Reng. He predicted the performance increase was bio-mechanical in nature quite some time ago. Keep in mind Wayne started off being a huge skeptic but decided to give it a try based upon his respect for Hunter Allen and his eye opening testing results. After multiple rides he commented he did not want to take the Spreng Reng off his bike. His most recent revelation is quite surprising and perhaps beneficial to any grand tour rider in that after using Spreng Reng on a hilly ride, subsequent days of riding are notably easier than if he had used a circular chainring. This somewhat aligns with the first thing you notice when riding with a Spreng Reng, it simply makes pedaling easier, it is quite noticeable. In fact, when you back test by switching back to a circular chainring, there is a quite noticeable hard spot right in the middle of the power stroke. Strange indeed. This project has no doubt had many ups, downs, and confusing turns, this is just another one of them. Please keep in mind we are in un-charted territory with a quasi-hexagonal chainring shape as it has never been done before but it performs better than expected with no bio-mechanical adaptation period needed, no shifting issues, no derailleur adjustments, consistently provides a performance increase at cadences under 100, and most importantly no reported muscular injuries. In fact Hunter Allen has been riding with a 36-tooth Spreng Reng exclusively for over a year with no reported problems. I’ll be glad to answer any further questions anyone has.

Greg
Greg
1 month ago
Reply to  DOUG

Why still no mention of the mechanism to the increased efficiency? Why six sides? Why not five or four or seven or ten or 36?

Robin
Robin
1 month ago
Reply to  DOUG

So how big is the population of cyclists who’ve tested this chainring? Was it a blind test, or did the riders know the chain ring was on the bike? How was the testing constrained, and were unconstrained confounding factors identified?

Frankly, the 26W increase in power is difficult to believe if only a handful of riders of tested this and if those rider tests had few constraints.

Ed LLorca
Ed LLorca
1 month ago
Reply to  DOUG

This addendum is actually worse than the article. In the article we learn nothing as to how this works. now you tell us YOU? don’t even know how this works yet you insist (much like trump insist until people believe) that is is wonderful. Sorry but I’m not buying hocus pocus of course nobody else is either because there is no actual product to buy.

Andreas
Andreas
1 month ago
Reply to  DOUG

So to summarise, silverstone found no evidence of any mechanical benefit of this system vs regular round rings?

Ululu
Ululu
1 month ago
Reply to  DOUG

“subsequent days of riding are notably easier”
So it felt easier. Doesn’t tell anything.
Can’t count the number of occasions I felt undefeatably fast on the bike but was going shockingly slow in reality and vice versa.

Even if there is a benefit it will be on such small scale you will need sophisticated methods and a lot of data to prove it.

Anyway, sincerely wishing you the best of luck.

Deputy Dawg
Deputy Dawg
1 month ago
Reply to  DOUG

Heck I’m old enough, and curious enough, and used to be fast enough that I’d give one of these a try (I also need a new mtb drivetrain next spring).

It would just have to be a 32t narrow-wide SRAM-type of thing.

Good luck, Doug!

JackL
JackL
1 month ago
Reply to  DOUG

OK, so the inventor admits that his initial hypothesis is wrong based on the the lab results. That doesn’t mean he may not have “stumbled” (pardon me for the word) onto something. Actually, quite a few inventions and discoveries were accidental (penicillin, the Americas…). So, personally, I give it the benefit of the doubt and hope people dive deeper into this to see if and so why there is a benefit. (Perhaps muscles benefit from small modulations in resistance, I don’t know.) As long as there is no product sold under false or questionable claims – *cough* aero performance *cough* – it doesn’t hurt to talk about things that are under development, given a minimum of credence. Hell, newspapers are full of discoveries that are said to be the next-big-thing since sliced bread, but that never make it out of the lab. And that is with proven/explained benefits.

Last edited 1 month ago by JackL
George
George
1 month ago

So many haters… It is an informational, “hey, check this interesting thing out” piece. No offense, but BikeRumor! Is often this style of journalism, and isn’t an exhaustive science site for the sport. Personally, I find this all interesting and appreciate what was shared. I’ll look forward to hearing more, and seeing what comes of it.

syborg
syborg
1 month ago
Reply to  George

BikeRumor, not BikeFact.

Robin
Robin
1 month ago
Reply to  George

Sorry, but being skeptical of the results and wanting to see more data isn’t being a hater. It’s thinking about things critically and not accepting claims at face value. This is no different than being skeptical about claims from any other bike manufacturers. If we shouldn’t be skeptical, then manufacturers should bin all testing and just claims. Then they can just leave it up to the individual rider to see if the claims are true or not. There’s no way that could go wrong at all.

Evan
Evan
1 month ago
Reply to  George

Probably bc the bike industry has a long history of snake oil so the default mode is (and should be) skepticism.

Don’t hold your breath for additional info though. Almost identical articles relating to this Spreng thing pop up on some low-traffic bike blog every few years, but even as time has passed, it’s somehow never closer to productionization.

Edmund
Edmund
1 month ago

Where can the general consumer be able to purchase the chainrings?

TropicalNachos
TropicalNachos
1 month ago
Reply to  Edmund

Maybe, read the article? he says he wants to collaborate with drivetrain manufactures first, then go direct to market if no one wants to collaborate.

Deputy Dawg
Deputy Dawg
1 month ago
Reply to  TropicalNachos

True, but IMO that isn’t going to happen. If he wants to get these out into the world, he’s going to have to roll the $$$ dice and sell them directly.

Laz
Laz
1 month ago

This is interesting….I look forward to being able to try it myself; although when I put a sh 42 in place of a 36 next to the 53 the chain did fall between and got badly trapped after I stopped at a light so I might be rather cautious jumping in with that Spreng Reng

uzurpator
uzurpator
1 month ago

This, coupled to my Ceramicspeed(r) OSPW, waxed chain and dimpled carbon rims will make me so much more faster!

Brian
Brian
1 month ago
Reply to  uzurpator

You won’t even have to pedal!

Jeff Schaffer
Jeff Schaffer
1 month ago

I have used 3dRotor assymetric chain rings for years and loved them. Once you find the correct placement, you get a longer lever arm at your strength in the pedal stroke. The rest of the circle goes through quicker to get you back to the power zone quicker. It does make a difference. This version likely does the same thing.

Grarick
Grarick
1 month ago
Reply to  Jeff Schaffer

If I’m interpreting correctly: pedal leverage compared to ring leverage at pedal position is
low at 12 o’clock
medium at 1
low at 2
high at 3
low at 4
medium at 5
low at 6.

Compared to an oval/elliptical where leverage increases from 12-3 o clock, decreases from 3-6. Rotor rings specifically ramp up resistance quickly from 12-2, decrease smoothly from 3-6.

Does pedaling efficiency increase with resistance increasing, decreasing, increasing around the highest leverage area of the power stroke? Maybe! Maybe for some people!
It might be good to find that out before sending this out for internet judgement.

JackL
JackL
1 month ago
Reply to  Grarick

This! Let’s dive deeper into this instead of just rejecting things.

Andreas
Andreas
1 month ago

Hearsay until proven otherwise by independent lab testing.

King County
King County
1 month ago

I can’t wait until someone comes out with wheels like this on kickstarter.

Oli
Oli
1 month ago

There are quite a few other hexagonal rings around. I forget their names. The reason they aren’t more adopted is that a lot of people report knee problems – similar to the Biopace disaster,

P.R.
P.R.
1 month ago
Reply to  Oli

Many people also report knee problems with round rings, though…

Last edited 1 month ago by P.R.
Aaron
Aaron
1 month ago

Well-done. Thanks for the article and highlighting innovation and innovators!

DOUG
DOUG
1 month ago

Just received word from Harry MacFarlane this morning he won his first hill climb race using the 38-tooth Spreng Reng that was just delivered last Friday!

RYAN
RYAN
1 month ago

Be interesting to see if there’s an efficiency gain on an Ebike.

nooner
nooner
1 month ago

I remember when this was called Biopace..

Dustin
Dustin
1 month ago

So does this only work for larger sprockets? What effect would it have on like a bmx bike running like a 28 or 25 tooth sprocket?

Whodee
Whodee
1 month ago

This has me thinking that if a hexagon-esque shape is better for a 36t ring, a triacontakaihexagon must be almost perfect.

Shane
Shane
1 month ago

I want one

Matt
Matt
1 month ago

BR: What’s your background—engineering, design?
DBJr: None of that. My past life was circulation director and MARKETING

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.