Home > Other Fun Stuff > Prototypes & Concepts

Schwalbe Reinvents the Mountain Bike Tire in Unique Radial Casing with Extra Grip for Albert

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert up-close
26 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Schwalbe is kind of reinventing the wheel with their new Radial mountain bike tires. It’s a simple but incredibly effective shift in tire construction that reshapes how an MTB tire can stick to the ground, even at higher pressure than before. At the same time, there’s an all-new Albert all-rounder that’s the face of this seismic radial shift in tire construction, in addition to another new soft-conditions tread & a version of the classic Magic Mary with the new tech.

Plus, both Trail & Gravity versions of the groundbreaking new Radial casing make it a versatile option for aggressive trail riders to all-mountain riders, and especially to enduro & DH racers. In fact, it’s already been raced to 9 World Cup DH victories including two wild wins by Amaury Pierron this year with massive time gaps.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert Gravity finale testing
(Photo/Schwalbe)

This feels like a pretty big deal, getting extra grip almost for free. We’ve been riding these Alberts for a month and a half now across all types of trails and bikeparks and in all conditions. And it does feel like a game-changer…

Schwalbe Radial Trail & Gravity mountain bike tires

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert more flex at smae pressure
(Photo/Schwalbe)

Probably the biggest driver in mountain bike tire development almost exclusively comes down to what a tire maker can do to get more grip. Ultimately it’s a balance. Lighter construction and faster-rolling rubber dominate in XC. But pretty much every other mountain biker wants more grip. Softer rubber can only go so far, without just feeling slow or simply wearing too fast.

Just over a decade ago, Schwalbe significantly reduced the number of layers in their tires for more flexibility – with the Super Gravity carcass – but that also reduced puncture protection. Then almost immediately, they tried to drastically lower tire pressure – with the security of ProCore inside – but that didn’t prevent snakebites, reduced cornering stability, and was overly complicated. So the German tire engineers kept hunting for a solution that maximized the tire’s small contact patch touching the trail, without sacrificing support or reliability.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert Gravity in Finale
(Photo/Schwalbe)

And they landed on Radial tires, or at least more radial…

What is a Radial tire & why do all bicycle tires use Bias-Ply construction?

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, bias-ply vs. more radial

Put simply, radial tires (like in your car) have a main structure of fibers that go straight up the sidewall from the rim, straight across the tread, and straight down the other sidewall back to the rim. Radially from the center of the wheel/tire combo. They have great flex characteristics and a smooth ride but generally require stiff belts of tough fibers (or steel) to support the tread.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, bias-ply vs. more radial
conventional bias-ply (l) vs. more radial (r)

Bias-Ply tires use a 90° crossing structure of fibers, generally angled 45° from the direction of travel, and alternating back and forth. Fibers are arranged in a bias, or diagonal orientation. This makes it easy to create a lightweight and round profile tire with low rolling resistance, and predictable sidewall & overall support.

Now Schwalbe has created something in between.

Schwalbe’s almost Radial mountain bike tires

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert tire swap
(All other photos/Cory Benson)

So radial tires are nothing new (Wikipedia tells me they were first patented in 1914), but they never really made their way to bicycles. And Schwalbe’s new Radial mountain bike tires aren’t entirely radial… just more radial. They settled on a smaller angle – somewhere between 10-20° – that lets Schwalbe get radial benefits without the need for extra belt support.

Schwalbe says much of the performance improvement comes from the ~25% shorter support fibers in the more radial construction vs. the conventional bias-ply tire. And since the fibers travel straighter across the tire casing, the distance that shorter, slightly angled fiber covers in the direction of the tire’s movement is reduced by almost 75%. That effectively means that if the tire hit a perfectly sharp edge that deformed the tire from bead-to-bead, in a conventional tire it could impact 100 fibers but in the new Schwalbe Radial tire it would hit only 25.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert more local deformation
(Graphics bySchwalbe)

Less tension in the thread, fewer intersections between threads, shorter threads, less threads engaged at any specific impact. All helping the tire be more flexible under the tread.

What are the real benefits?

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert increased contact patch

So, all that means more flexibility and more local deflection of the tire at the point of contact with an obstacle. That lets the treadblocks roll around an object to get more grip, but in a smaller area so you don’t sacrifice stability.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, improved rebound damping

It also helps slow tire rebound, damping pressure spikes in the tire for a smoother ride and improved “control, grip, and comfort off-road”.

And the somewhat surprising benefit of a more local deflection is you get a larger contact patch at the same pressures. Schwalbe says it’s a 30% increase in the contact area, without lowering tire pressure. The huge benefit here is that you can actually increase tire pressure by +7psi/0.5bar in the Radial tire and still have a 10% larger contact patch than the conventional bias-ply tire.

That’s huge actually. So, more support and flat resistance AND more grip. Schwalbe even says you can run a less aggressive tread and get the same grip, with improved rolling resistance. And the Radial tires come in at the exact same weight as the old Super Gravity casing.

And the downsides?

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert back-to--back tests

More tire flex does mean a bit of increased rolling resistance, so you won’t see Schwalbe Radial tires blowing up the XC, gravel, or road scene right away. (But it seems this new Albert Radial has more grip and lower rolling resistance vs. the conventional Magic Mary, so there does seem like some possibilities for mixing up tread patterns to get back that extra drag.)

The other negative is slightly reduced resistance to snake bites. But Schwalbe says they can use the same sidewall reinforcing construction as their previous generation of mountain bike tires without negatively affecting the radial performance, so there’s plenty of room to dial protection in to suit each type of riding.

Now back to the new Albert tread, itself

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert side

The new Schwalbe Radial construction will be available in three families – Albert, Magic Mary & Shredda – all intended for longer travel all-mountain to gravity bikes and eMTBs.

The all-new Albert is the most well-rounded of the three, pairing chunky medium-height tread blocks with a relatively tightly-spaced layout for all-around versatility.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert tread
(Photo/Schwalbe)

It has a round shape and smooth transition from knob to knob, leveraging the Radial flex so more rubber on the trail means more traction.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert in the wet

It’s much more aggressive than a Nobby Nic or Wicked Will trail tire. But at the same time easier to manage than the race-focused Tacky Chan or the more open loose conditions Magic Mary.

Albert First Impressions

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert Trail in the dry

This isn’t meant to be a conditions-specific racing tire – and does favor hard trail surfaces over soft loam. Albert is the solid and predictable tire you put on your enduro bike at the start of the season and just ride it no matter how the weather or trail conditions change.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert Trail on natural enduro

We’ve been doing that for the past couple of months, riding everything from Finale to Leogang to 4 Czech bikeparks and a number of natural trails.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert Trail on wet rocks

From wet rocks & roots, slick mud, to loose rocks to smooth hardpack and deep dusty corners, and the Alberts have been incredibly predictable – often offering grip when we had low expectations.

And the new Shredda tread, too

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Shredda soft conditions tire

We haven’t had a chance to try the taller, more open, wet conditions Shredda. But it’s kinda the absolute opposite to Albert.

This is a very conditions-specific enduro and DH race tire. It’s big and open with tall spikes that overhang the sidewall to claw for grip, inspired by enduro motocross motorcycle tires. You get taller open spikes on the front-specific Shredda and more of a paddle layout on the rear-specific tire. Like the Albert though, the Shredda tread blocks are said to be optimized for the more locally-flexible Radial tire construction, so they fold over an obstacle for improved grip.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Shredda tread
all-new Shredda rear (l) & front (r)

This is a tire for wet and muddy riding, or for flying down deep loamy trails. And it features linked central knobs for better support, especially on powerful, big-travel ebikes.

Schwalbe Radial MTB tires – Models, sizing, pricing & availability

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert Gravity on a 29er enduro bike

The general idea with this all-new Schwalbe Radial mountain bike tire lineup is to offer a wide range for anyone riding long travel bikes (150+mm) across a range of conditions. That means aggressive trail, all-mountain, enduro, freeride & DH, plus ebike variations of any of those types of riding, too. So, that also means there are two casing levels – Trail with medium sidewall protection and Gravity with heavy-duty sidewall protection.

The tire options include the new Albert & classic Magic Mary which can be run on either front or rear, plus the new Shredda which is front- or rear-specific.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert Trail on a mullet all-mountain bike

All of the tires come in 29″ and 27.5″ options (Shredda Front is 29er only) and in one width per tire. They are 2.5-2.6” wide because the taller, larger tire volume diameter tire benefits more from the new Radial construction. Addix rubber compounds are Soft or Super Soft for the Alberts, or Super Soft only for the more aggro treads.

Schwalbe Radial Trail Gravity mountain bike tires, Albert Gravity on an eMTB

Schwalbe’s pricing is 74€ per tire for the Radial Trail tires, or 80€ for the Radial Gravity tires, with all available through retailers now. Even though it is as simple as how the fabric is oriented inside the tire when it is made, this feels like a real seismic shift in mountain bike tire construction. Keep your eyes peeled for our more detailed review of the Albert Trail & Gravity Radial tires, coming soon.

Schwalbe.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steven
Steven
1 month ago

I would like to try these tires. I have ridden trials tires on my dirt bike (rear) and they do feel squishier. But they did have a great upside.

nooner
nooner
1 month ago

Great article @Cory well done! Wait, so if i get these tires i will be fast as Amoury? Sign me up! Anyone with experience know how these stack up in terms of durability compared with Maxxis Downhill casings?

Eddiecycle
Eddiecycle
1 month ago

The article title is a bit misleading. There have been radial mtb options off and on over the years with the same promises of rolling and confirming better. They never quite take off for one reason or another. Maybe Schwalbe has done it right this time. I believe the past tires were true radial with the threads not crossing at all, so perhaps that’s the key

Tom
Tom
1 month ago
Reply to  Eddiecycle

changing the bias angle is hardly rocket science, so it begs the question as to why other haven’t commercialized this before – it’s certainly easy enough to experiment. I can say that I’ve had great luck using tires with an enduro casing for my rough rides, running them at relatively low pressure. I don’t really care about rolling resistance, I just want the tires to stay planted over roots and rocks without squirming or pinch flatting. If you end up running radials at higher pressure to prevent squirm and pinch flats, have you really achieved anything?

Pete
Pete
1 month ago

More tire flex does mean a bit of increased rolling resistance, so you won’t see Schwalbe Radial tires blowing up the XC, gravel, or road scene right away. (But it seems this new Albert Radial has more grip and lower rolling resistance vs. the conventional Magic Mary

Wouldn’t more flex cause less rolling resistance on bumpy terrain because less less hysteresis?

froze
froze
1 month ago
Reply to  Pete

That’s what I’m wondering about too, hopefully, someone can shed some light on that.

MK1990
MK1990
26 days ago
Reply to  Cory Benson

@Cory: Every single cycling tyre manufacturer is doing everything to make their casing more supple to improve rolling resistance, e.g. higher TPIs, adding Graphene etc. You claim goes directly against what every single tyre manufacturer and every single scientific research has shown.

Without showing us scientific data that proves everything that the industry has known wrong, in my view I see a writer with lack of knowledge (which is alright, can’t know everything) and stubbornness to stick to own assumptions instead of looking up the facts (which is not the level I expect on Bikerumor).

The main reason more suppleness creates lower rolling resistance, especially on bumpier surfaces, is because the whole body weight and bike weight don’t get lifted up. Lifting up this (in my case) total over 100kg is energy that is lost in vertical movement, this energy is being deducted from forward movement.

Even the slightest vibrations mean lifting 100+kg up dozens of times per second, which is a lot of loss in forward momentum.

It’s the same reason why softer tyres are faster on XC (why im surprised you mention that it’s a benefit that you can put more pressure in your tyres) and why fullies tend to be generally faster on XC than hardtails.

A. Rearte
A. Rearte
25 days ago
Reply to  MK1990

I think you are oversimplifying. If you only consider the energy required for lifting up the weight, then you don’t loose energy as it is stored in height and regained every time the weight rolls back down again.

Where you loose energy is in deflection of the Rubber (and friction in suspension and other things moving and muscle movement which is dependent on tire deflection, but we are talking tires here). The deflection creates friction in the rubber which leads to energy dissipation. Thats the hysteresis Less comes out than you put in. So in theory it is a valid claim to say more deflection creates more rolling resistance.

In reality when the tread conforms to the ground, there is much more happening. Knobs can hook on to things which requires force to unhook and a compressed knob (stored energy) can slip and release the energy without adding forward movement. So imho it is very hard to say one feature directly leads to one thing.

theKaiser
theKaiser
21 days ago
Reply to  A. Rearte

You are correct in your definition of hysteresis. All else being equal, increased casing deflection increases losses to hysteresis in scenarios like a smooth road.

But MK1990 is largely correct in his description of how more tire flex (while adding a small amount of hysteresis losses) can save total energy expenditures by preventing the bike/rider mass from being accelerated upward when hitting a bump. Losses to those upward accelerations are often called “Suspension Losses” and one can not count on the upward acceleration being reliably recovered when the mass returns downward. If going over a bump, say a tree root or a few inch high rock, the the tire would need to ride up the bump’s front side, and then maintain contact with the bump’s back side on the way down to recover the potential energy that has been stored by the upward movement of the mass. What happens more often than not, if riding at a spirited pace on a flat or down hill grade, is the rider mass continues upward after the peak of the bump, the tire loses contact with the back side, and the whole mass comes down to a flat landing on the ground after the bump has passed. Without catching the “backside” or “transition” down ramp formed by the rear of the bump, the energy will be lost.

You seem to understand how energy can be stored by a system but not recovered in a productive form when it is released as in your great example of knob flex, so the principle is very similar.

A. Rearte
A. Rearte
13 days ago
Reply to  theKaiser

That is exactly my point. You can‘t just simplify all the things happening and induce from that: more deflection = less resistance.
If you keep contact after the bump: energy recovered
if not: energy lost.
If knob slips: energy lost… etc

If you have more or less resistance probably depends on terrain and is a sum of all micro-effects. What stays the same is hysteresis. you will never get energy out of that.

If it would be so clear that it offers less resistance, why would the Schwalbe guys drop such a good selling point?

M.m.
M.m.
1 month ago

Isn’t tire flex determined by tire pressure?anyone remember the 26×1.95 kenda connection mtb tire?or the specialized crossroads 26×1.95?these 2 tires had a pretty cool tread design.

A. Rearte
A. Rearte
25 days ago
Reply to  M.m.

If a peace of loth is woven 90° crossed in two directions, thereare threads in two directions that can counter tension. If you take strictly radial cloth, meaning the threads are all parallel to each other, then there are only threads in one direction to counter tension. 90° to that, the threads are complete loose. So a strictly radial tire is only dependent on the rubber to counter tension as there are no threads helping. In that direction the tire is very “soft”. (I am not claiming real radial tires are like that)

Reformed Roadie
Reformed Roadie
1 month ago

It seems these would be ideal to use in conjunction with an insert.

nooner
nooner
1 month ago

It would seem like maybe you have to. At least Scwalbe was transparent about that.

nooner
nooner
1 month ago

It would seem like maybe you have to. At least Scwalbe was transparent about that.and what’s with the milkshake party in the lead pic?

Reformed Roadie
Reformed Roadie
1 month ago
Reply to  nooner

That brings all the boys to the yard…

Seriously tho, this, combined with the new Rimpact inserts could be a sweet set-up.

theKaiser
theKaiser
1 month ago

Yeah, I agree, supple casing for traction and small bump absorption with the insert to take big hits. Strangely, Schwalbe seem to claim they created this tire specifically to allow the team to not run inserts, with the thinking being that the casing is more supple, allowing them to run higher pressure to prevent pinch flats and rim damage, without compromising grip. Seems highly questionable to me, but I’m trying to keep an open mind.

nooner
nooner
22 days ago
Reply to  Cory Benson

Yeah but how hard are you riding bro? CAT Pro1-3 level? didn’t think so… Does Amaury run inserts both front and rear? I run Maxxis DH casing front and rear and still have issues sometimes. and what’s with that milkshake party?

Doc Sarvis
Doc Sarvis
27 days ago

Interesting how long it takes certain industries to adopt technologies that have been around for many decades.

theKaiser
theKaiser
21 days ago
Reply to  Doc Sarvis

While I agree with you in principal, there is a reason that this technology hasn’t been adopted before. As far as I understand it, yes radial construction has been around for decades and commonly in use in cars, but has been tried repeatedly on bicycles and motorcycles over those same decades, with little success, due to the differing demands of 2 wheeled vehicles vs. 4 wheeled vehicles.

MK1990
MK1990
26 days ago

Let’s take away all the marketing nonsense and look at the facts. How I see this is that this technology can make a sturdy tyre ride like a tyre with thin casing (more supple, more grip, lower rolling resistance) but instead of being thinner and lighter, it keeps its thickness and weight for the extra protection.

Which is also the reason why this technology is less interesting for XC racing tyre with already thin casing.

Some facts to add:

  • More supply tyres have less rolling resistance (this has been proven in every single research you’ll find online).
  • More supple casing means that you’ll have pinch flats more quickly (an object will hit the rim faster), but flats from sharp objects less quickly (the tyre can better form it self around the sharp object, causing less pressure on it to puncture).
  • Adding more air will not make you faster on mtb trails, it will actually slow you down (plenty of researches are findable online about this)
  • I do see the benefit in this technology, but the marketing nonsense around it makes me cringe so hard my muscles start cramping.
A. Rearte
A. Rearte
25 days ago
Reply to  MK1990

I would like to be picky and add/correct your facts:

1. Depends on terrain and rubber compounds.
3. *Too much air will not make you faster on an mtb trail

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.