Home > Other Fun Stuff > Prototypes & Concepts

Spotted: Canyon/DT-Swiss Gravel Suspension Fork is Closer to Production

9 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

The speculative Canyon/DT-Swiss gravel fork collaboration is moving on to prime time and likely production. We noticed a sneaky post by Canyon athlete Freddy Ovett before the Traka in Girona, Spain.

He posted, “Hey Siri: Show me the optimal Traka bike,” paired with a photo of a unique Canyon Grail featuring a suspension gravel fork. If you flip through the photos, you’ll notice the fork doesn’t look like a pro-one-off; it’s ready for the big show. 

Thanks to Moritz Sauer for sharing the excellent Spy Shot photos with us! (Photo/Moritz Sauer)

The fork in question is similar (more like identical) to the one Cory Benson found last year at the German gravel national championships in Daun, which happens to be just 70km from Canyon HQ in Koblenz. 

Canyon gravel fork DT Swiss

Canyon Gravel Suspension Fork

What do we know? The first thing that jumps out is the reverse arch design. The exact layout we’ve seen recently on Fox’s ultra-light XC, gravel forks, and DT-Swiss OPM and F 232 ONE models. 

Why a reverse arch? Reverse arches allow for shorter axle-to-crown heights and better frontal stiffness. Which is beneficial for a bike that’s getting bounced around on mixed terrain like gravel. 

prototype Canyon x DT Swiss race-ready 40mm gravel suspension fork, Spy Shot photo by Moritz Sauer, pre-race up close

When you take a closer look (read: squint at every zoomed photo available). It looks like this thing may be running 40mm of travel with 30mm stanchions—a solid sweet spot for performance-focused gravel racing.  As we first saw on DT’s 535 One trail fork, the crown gets integrated caps. It’s a a nice touch that adds to the premium finish—and there’s a lower leg cutout for rebound adjustment, just like the 232 One.

Canyon gravel fork DT Swiss IG

Other Features – Canyon Gravel Suspension Fork

  • Possible Remote lockout? It’s likely mechanical but possibly wireless. We can’t imagine a dedicated gravel race fork without one. So now we’re wondering if the lock out moved from where Cory Benson saw it last year, or was moved higher on the shifter body. 
  • Aero rear-facing brake line routing, cleanly exiting the back of the fork crown, keeps the front end tidy and aero.
  • Accessory mounts? There are bolts low on either leg. These are possibly for fenders or cargo cages, though we’re betting on fenders given the race context.

There is no official word on launch timing yet, but if Canyon’s racing it (and leaking it), the time is getting close.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nathan
Nathan
14 hours ago

Looks like it takes a 29 x 2.2. Most grav sus forks look like an afterthought. This is the first time one has looked good to me.

Prrrrrrer
Prrrrrrer
13 hours ago

It reads “Reverse arches allow for shorter axle-to-crown heights and better frontal stiffness. Which is beneficial for a bike that’s getting bounced around on mixed terrain like gravel.”

Shouldn’t it read “Reverse arches allow for shorter axle-to-crown heights and better frontal stiffness, which is beneficial for a bike that’s getting bounced around on mixed terrain like gravel.”?

Too much time on my hands, I suppose, but proper grammar lends credibility, right? I also retain the right to be incorrect…

Matt G
Matt G
12 hours ago
Reply to  Prrrrrrer

You’ve broken rule #1: don’t be a d*ck.

Prrrrrrer
Prrrrrrer
11 hours ago
Reply to  Matt G

I don’t like getting corrected either, but in this instance, I see this mistake in my students consistently. Nonetheless, I’m asking if it was a mistake, not insisting that it was. Also, I’m not sure the question qualifies me for d*ck status. Lame, maybe, but not d*ck.

Johann
Johann
10 hours ago
Reply to  Prrrrrrer

I’m not bothered by the style. More by the content. Can someone explain me how a reverse arch can have the advantages that are mentioned? I REALLY don’t get it.

Geoff
Geoff
10 hours ago
Reply to  Johann

If it’s “frontal stiffness” you want, a rear arch is really the only way.

Greg
Greg
8 hours ago
Reply to  Johann

Reverse arches only exhibit those traits if the fork legs have leading dropouts. As this one has an inline dropout, the leg extends radially from the hub, and the arch height is the same. Even with a leading dropout, the effect is tiny.
The downsides of a reverse arch are significant. There’s a clearance issue with the down tube. The arch can only be so tall before the arch contacts the down tube during full compression. Some aero frames have down tubes that drop behind the fork crown, very much interfering with this. Also, if the crown has any forward sweep at all, then the arch would contact the crown unless it is made to angle back.
I think some people like the aesthetic for road-ish bikes.

Catherine
Catherine
10 hours ago

The axle moves up and down. The crown doesn’t. That seems true for both types of fork. Actually, doesn’t the BRIDGE stay closer to the axle on the traditional fork?
Cannondale had a solution for that about 30 years ago. Look it up.
Big whoop.

Philipp
Philipp
1 minute ago

Seems to have an enormous fork offset. This could ruin the gains in calm behavior of adding front squish.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.