Home > Bike Types > Fatbike

Surly Moonlander Takes Off with 24 x 6.2″ Tires and Pinion Gearbox!

20 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Just when you thought fat bikes couldn’t get any bigger, Surly swoops in with a new Moonlander. Now, this is not your typical Moonlander. Sure, the model was known as Surly’s biggest fat tire bike at a time when 4” was still considered large, but this is different… for a few reasons. 

24 x 6.2″ Tires!

The biggest (literally) of these may be the all-new 24 x 6.2” Surly Molenda Tires. Yes, you read that right. Surly downsized the rim, and upsized the tire for even more extreme flotation on all terrain. Surly states that the Moonlander frame can also roll on 26 x 5.1”, 27.5 x 4.8”, and 29 x 3” tires. Molenda tires feature a 2-ply 60 tpi casing that is tubeless ready, and have a claimed weight of 2200 – 2300g and will cost $150 each. 

If you don’t want to run tubeless, you’ll need to use Surly’s new TPU inner tube in the matching 24 x 6.2” size that supports low pressures (2-10psi). The inner tubes alone are $49 a piece, but given the size that doesn’t seem too bad considering regular TPU inner tubes are pushing $30-40. 

To mount those gargantuan Molenda tires, Surly has also introduced a new 24 x 100mm Clown Royal Rim. The 32h rim requires the use of the Surly 24” Nylon rim strip, and will be available aftermarket to build custom wheels. Rims will run $280 each with another $8 for the rim strip. 

One of the goals of the Moonlander project was to create a fat bike with the largest tire footprint possible without creating any new standards or q-factor that was unrideable. To that effect, the Moonlander uses standard 197 x 12mm hubs front and rear (rear hubs on both), and has the same q-factor as the existing Ice Cream Truck. 

To accomplish that, the Moonlander uses a longer rear end which allows the proper tire/chain/crank clearance while also increasing stability. Surly claims that the Moonlander looks, feels, and rides like a normal bike in spite of the comically wide tires. 

A Gearbox?

While the 100% Surly Chromoly steel frame is familiar, the drivetrain is decidedly not – at least for Surly. On a bike like the Moonlander, weight and efficiency play second and third fiddle to reliability in extreme conditions. That’s why Surly opted for the Pinion 9-speed gearbox instead of a traditional derailleur system. This is Surly’s first-ever use of the Pinion system, citing that it protects the drivetrain from inhospitable conditions and offers higher ground clearance than the typical fat bike thanks to a higher BB shell.

Geometry

Offered in four sizes from S-XL, the frames have a smaller front triangle for better standover and easier on/off. Those front triangles can house one water bottle for small frames, two on the medium, and 3 on L/XL frames. You’ll also find accessory mounts on the fork blades, and plenty of mounts for racks, fenders, and more. The frames are internal dropper post compatible and run a 30.9mm post.

How much does it weigh?

Complete weight is claimed to be about 45 lbs for a medium frame. Just the frameset alone (frame, fork, collar, axles) is 12lbs, 4oz. Not light. But look at it!

Pricing & Availability

Pricing is set at $4,199 for the complete bike and $1,199 for the frameset (which doesn’t appear to include the gearbox). Moonlanders are available for order on Surly’s website, including the option to ship to your home from a participating dealer close to you.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Drew Diller
3 months ago

I’m into it!

HDManitoba
HDManitoba
3 months ago

Getting closer to a Hannebrink(sp?) all the time.

Billyshoo
Billyshoo
3 months ago
Reply to  HDManitoba

You spelled it right. But would there be any advantage to a smaller diameter wheel (like Dan used)? I wouldn’t think so.

HDManitoba
HDManitoba
3 months ago
Reply to  Billyshoo

The hannebrink used ATV tires which dictated the rim size, but also was a solid wheel, not spokes like this.

Not sure on advantages of the rim size either way.

Jim
Jim
3 months ago
Reply to  HDManitoba

It was what was available at the time of its inception

Simon
Simon
3 months ago
Reply to  Jim

They offered great tire selection.

kevin
kevin
3 months ago

That’s a big price tag for a very very heavy bike.

Some nice carbon fatbikes cost less than that. I would wager a lightweight carbon fat bike on 4.8 tires would “float” better.

Ben
Ben
3 months ago
Reply to  kevin

If I am crossing the outback or riding along the coasts of Alaska this is easily my pick. larger contact patch and longer wheelbase will far outweigh (heh) any carbon “race” fat bike. The odd tire size does scare me in the long run though for parts availability. I don’t see this size taking off for anything but this bike and similar custom frames.

Matt
Matt
3 months ago
Reply to  Ben

The bike can also run 26, 27.5, and 29 wheels so I think with the increased options of wheel size the parts avail is muted a little.

601LX
601LX
3 months ago
Reply to  kevin

You’re not factoring in rider weight, you lost your wager.

kevin
kevin
3 months ago
Reply to  601LX

I weigh the same on steel as I do on carbon

Jason Crabtree
Jason Crabtree
3 months ago

This would almost be the perfect bike for me for riding the local sand dunes if they ever close to vehicular traffic.

The only bummer is that they didn’t make Provisions to run a belt drive. To me, the pinion with a belt really offers that all conditions ruggedness.

Bones
Bones
3 months ago

No belt drive?

satanas
satanas
3 months ago

IMHO no gearbox is a good thing as there are other – arguably better – options than the C1.9. Surly say the Q factor is the same as their ICT, but I haven’t found a number – maybe 228mm? It also doesn’t look like the frame is belt compatible, but maybe Gates don’t make a long enough belt anyway.

Oliver
Oliver
3 months ago
Reply to  satanas

It seems like a pretty huge oversight for a dune bike to not have an option for belt drive. Particularly when it comes as standard with a gearbox drivetrain.

Matt
Matt
3 months ago
Reply to  satanas

I’m betting that with such a long rear end that there isn’t a long enough belt or Gates would have to produce a special one for the bike.

Seven
Seven
3 months ago

I love the look, how’s the ride quality without suspension.

Napoleon
Napoleon
3 months ago

What the frick was gramma doin at the dunes?!?

GreenPlease
GreenPlease
3 months ago

Kinda want one tbh… don’t have a legitimate *need* but definitely a *want*

threeringcircus
threeringcircus
3 months ago

Cool…didn’t see this coming!

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.