Home > Event Coverage > Eurobike

EB15: Evil Rises Up with 27.5″ Wheeled Insurgent

17 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

evil insurgent 275  (6)

Some would have you believe the choice between 27.5 and 29″ wheels is equivalent to the battle between good and evil. Fortunately, now you can have both from Evil bikes. After launching their 29 inch wheeled The Following, Evil is rolling out their 27.5″ option called the Insurgent.

Equipped with 150 mm of travel, midsized wheels, and fun, adjustable geometry, the Insurgent continues Evil’s revolt against boring bikes…

evil insurgent 275  (7)

evil insurgent 275  (11) evil insurgent 275  (10)

Continuing the use of the Delta Link suspension, the Insurgent offers four different geometry positions between the flip chips and the adjustable angle headset made by FSA. The 150 mm travel frame is capable of fitting large piggyback shocks and even coils.

evil insurgent 275  (16) evil insurgent 275  (17)

evil insurgent 275  (15)

Only built to accept a rear derailleur, shift cable routing is internal through the seat stay, while the brake housing is kept fully external. The internal dropper post cable enters on the side of the head tube.

evil insurgent 275  (12)

evil insurgent 275  (5) evil insurgent 275  (8)

In place of the front derailleur, the frame includes a built in chain guide that is removable. The frame also includes only the two lower mounting points for the ISCG05 chain guides. Since the frame already offers an upper chain guide the two bolts are only needed to provide a bash guard.

evil insurgent 275  (13) evil insurgent 275  (14)

evil insurgent 275  (4)

The Insurgent offers plenty of built-in frame protection and sticks with a threaded 73mm bottom bracket. At the back you’ll find a non-boost 142×12 axle with post mount disc brake tabs.

evil insurgent 275  (18)

Starting at $2800 for the frame and shock, completes will have a starting retail price of $5199 for an X1 build and will go up from there.

Evil also had another surprising bike to launch which was missing when we first went by the booth, because tradeshow. On the very last day we were walking by the booth which was completely closed off but we were able to poke our camera inside and noticed the bike had shown up after we stopped by. You can see it at the rear to the right, which is their new urban commuter bike. We’ll try to get the full details on this at Interbike.

evil-bikes.com

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ryan
Ryan
9 years ago

That is easy on the eyes…soothing actually.

I can’t look away.

Steven
Steven
9 years ago

Why did they go 73 thread BB on this thing and not the Following. That PF92 is the only thing keeping me from buying a Following… I’m glad to see no Boost spacing as wells.

Morecore
Morecore
9 years ago

26″ hardtail model will be called the suicide bomber

satisFACTORYrider
satisFACTORYrider
9 years ago

this and the knolly warden will fight it out for my wallet

satisFACTORYrider
satisFACTORYrider
9 years ago

if i had a wallet

Groghunter
Groghunter
9 years ago

don’t really like the 2 bolts idea, was just discussing this with a buddy last night. bashing a guard mounted that way is going to sideload the bolts directly. 3 bolts at least can try to change some of the vertical force into the horizontal plane, where the ISCG mounts are strong. hate to say it, but what we probably need is a new standard for taco only mounting that transmits force into the frame, rather than relying exclusively on the shear strength of some little M3 bolts.

Tim
Tim
9 years ago

Cool-looking bikes, but those pivot bolts look darn small. Shame about no Boost, too. But awesome on the 73mm bb.

gbcoke
gbcoke
9 years ago

why do you need boost with a 27.5 16.9 in cs frame? i thought its more for 29 bikes to have stiffer wheels and allow for shorter cs , or is it ??? regarding pivot bolts,they are a non issue on the following so hopefully the same here.

satisFACTORYrider
satisFACTORYrider
9 years ago

@tim- no bolt worries. a friend has been abusing his uprising from its debut til now on multiple trips at angel fire, bootleg and snowshoe without a peep. amazing bikes

Mr. P
9 years ago

Nice bike!

Why all the love for the 73mm threaded BB? Notably up against PF92.

You would rather have less lateral frame stiffness for less POTENTIAL squeaks and more bearing replacement?

P

Myke
Myke
9 years ago

Great company just a truly poor choice in name!!!

AChromagSamurai
AChromagSamurai
9 years ago

take my money

Tim
Tim
9 years ago

@Mr. P- Unfortunately, I don’t have much time for riding these days, but the bikes I rode most heavily back in the day had 68mm or 73mm threaded bottom brackets. Bearing replacements occurred once in a blue moon. Squeaks and creaking originating from the bearing-frame interface were a non-issue. I also worked as a shop mechanic, and I rarely saw anyone replace the bearings on their threaded bottom brackets, except if they were using crummy small diameter ISIS ones. Meanwhile, press-fit bottom brackets of all stripes routinely suffer from squeaks. People complain about them all the time. There’s ‘potential’ for squeaking (and much louder creaking) in every frame-bearing interface. That ‘potential’ happens to be much higher on frames with press-fit bottom brackets. Every time a person buys a bike, they’re making a wager on that bike’s reliability. If I’m laying down 5K or so for a bike, that’s a very big wager; I’d like my ‘potential’ of getting a creaking frame to be as close to zero as possible for that kind of money. But yes, press-fit bottom brackets are stiffer. But the reliability issue is a big one.
Another old thing that’s become new again that sucks: internal cabling. It won’t stop me from buying a bike, but it’s definitely a minus, and one that came about because of a preference for looks over ease of use and maintenance.

AbelF
AbelF
9 years ago

Very cool bike!! Hope the come around to offer front derailleur support.
I dont buy that “PF is stiffer crap”, I think the structure surrounding the BB plays a bigger role. I have ridden some very stiff frames with threaded bb, doubt that many (or any) would be able to tell the difference in stiffness with an equivalent PF frame. You sure can tell the difference in squeakiness!!

wuffles
wuffles
9 years ago

@Mr. P
The lateral frame stiffness thing has been grossly exaggerated by companies hoping to cut costs and sell it as “better”

Santa Cruz uses threaded BBs on all their mountain bikes, and those are about the stiffest frames made. YT is using pressfits, and according to the numbers-obsessed germans, those are some of the flexiest frames around (not necessarily a bad thing, but a thing).

MTBs generally require a bb replacement every year for your average rider, or more often if you’re aggressive/racing. That sucks if it’s pressfit, especially if the tolerances were sloppy to begin with. You soon find yourself needing custom sleeves to get the cups to sit true, otherwise they creak and creep constantly.

Pressfit has no place on a mountain bike.

Evil guys
Evil guys
9 years ago

@Groghunter

First off, love your webname, Groghunter, hah, nice

Anyways, the bashguard mounts to the frame via the 35mm bottom bracket with the two M6 bolts there to keep it from rotating and offering some lateral support (to the tune of about 10,000# of force). The bashguard mount plate just replaces the 2.5mm spacer in the crankset.

It’s a time tested method, and although there are no fancy acronyms that can be used to describe it, it’s something that is known and robust, and reasonably light as well.

May your grog hunt be successful!

Evil guys
Evil guys
9 years ago

@Tim

17mm main pivot with a thru shaft pivot and every bearing int eh bike is a dual row angular contact with a custom fastener specifically sized for that pivot. So in short, they are “really f’ing strong”

@pressfit BB guys

agreed on all points. Thread in is simple, re-usable, robust, cost-effective, and the stiffness change is minimal if anything. It’s a non factor in overall frame stiffness of a mountain bike for the most part. Maybe that’s different for a 700g road bike, but these DH bikes masquerading as trail bikes are so strong already, it just doesn’t matter.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.