Home > Other Fun Stuff > Advocacy & Industry News

Hed Cycling licenses aero rim designs to Specialized, opens doors to others

20 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

2015 HED Jet Black and Ardennes Black road tubeless wheels

Hed Cycling and Specialized have entered into an agreement whereby Specialized will license Hed’s patented aerodynamic rim profiles. Both companies will share technology and product development efforts, too, according the PR.

Hed’s patent describes the Tangent Angle, which is a line drawn between the tire’s side and the widest point on the rim’s sidewall. That’s used to predict the Stall Angle for the rims, which is the crosswind angle at which air detaches from the backside of the rim, where the “back” side of the rim is the side that’s not facing the wind. So, if the wind is blowing left to right, the right side of the rim is the “back” side.

The Stinger line, in particular the Stinger 6 that was developed with Team Highroad, is where their wider rim shape started. From that development, Hed applied for a patent in 2009 and was eventually granted US Patent No. 8,888,195 in 2014, a long five year review period in which a lot of other peoples’ rims were developed…

hed-cycling-aerodynamic-wheels-patent-drawing-1

The patent mentions certain tangent angles (illustrated by 440 in Fig.4, showing different angles based on different tire widths), but only as examples without limiting the angles covered by the patent.

Specifically, the patent says: “The amount of increase in stall angle due to depth decreases as the tangent angle increases.” In laymen’s terms, Hed’s rep told us the point of the patent is that they can design an optimal range of yaw based on rim and tire combinations, and predict the stall angle.

 

hed-cycling-aerodynamic-wheels-patent-drawing-2

Anything that has a deep and wide, bulge-shaped rim could be affected by Hed’s patent, which is actually a rim-and-tire relationship patent, not just one about rim designs. As you can imagine, it’s likely more rim brands’ designs could be using a design covered by this patent.

Anne Hed had this to say: “We hope other wheel manufacturers that would require a license would enter into a similar friendly relationship like Specialized has done.”

There’s a separate rim-only patent that covers toroidal designs that Hed, Zipp (and possibly others) have shared ownership of.

PRESS RELEASE: Hed Cycling and Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. are pleased to announce the creation of a cooperative relationship in which the two innovators in the bicycle industry can share technology, build products and collaborate to bring the most advanced cycling components to a broader market of cyclists. As part of the collaboration, Specialized will license Hed’s U.S. Patent No. 8,888,195 directed to aerodynamic bicycle rim shaping and design. Hed filed for this patent on June 9, 2009, and it was approved by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on November 18, 2014.

The relationship between Hed and Specialized is an alliance between two companies committed to advancing their products in order to better serve their customers. Hed’s reputation for speed began in the 1980s with the invention of the modern aerodynamic disc wheel. Hed continues to “reinvent the wheel” through a commitment to providing the best possible, most reliable, fastest, and most well-rounded cycling products. Since its founding in 1974, Specialized has lived by the motto “innovate or die.” The “Win Tunnel” is one example of Specialized’s continued commitment to creating the most aerodynamic, highest-performing products on the road. Specialized and Hed look forward to the opportunities the relationship can provide, and to the continued opportunity to earn the position as the rider’s brand of choice.

HedCycling.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James
James
8 years ago

This sounds like Specialized wasn’t in on the development of the toroidal shape, unlike some of the others, and had to pony up for their current Roval deep wheel designs or (and this is quite a reversal for them) get sued.
Next thing, the city of Roubaix will shake them down for a licensing fee.
The press release quoted puts the best face on it, makes it sound like they’re going to be doing a lot of R&D work together. But that’s not what this smells like. Smells like Roval wheels will continue to be done in-house, HED will do its own thing.
This doesn’t even flatly say HED gets to use the Win Tunnel… which you would think would be central to the cooperation. So what kind of R&D cooperation is this?

Veganpotter
Veganpotter
8 years ago

My guess is that this is the window into HED finally having carbon clinchers for rim brakes. Something they failed to release for heat buildup damaging tubes…not rims. Sure, it can still happen but money talks.

Dan Lind
8 years ago
Reply to  Veganpotter

No. From what I’ve heard, HED was only exploring carbon clinchers in response to market demand. HED has always known that carbon clinchers, from a performance perspective, add nothing. However, they do pose significant safety issues. So instead they produced a wheel (Black edition) that looks like a carbon clincher yet performs significantly better (enhanced braking power, no heat issues) and is safer.

Veganpotter
Veganpotter
8 years ago
Reply to  Dan Lind

Sorry bud but they’re lighter and they let you change the angle of the brake track if need be. You can machine rims at an angle but its much more difficult. Why do you think Zipps and Enve rims have angled brake tracks?

Dan Lind
8 years ago
Reply to  Veganpotter

The weight difference between HED Jet 6+ Black, Zipp 404 Firecrest and Enve 6.7 system is negligible at best. According to Zipp specs, 404’s are actually 17g HEAVIER than Jet 6+.

Secondly, what’s the performance benefit of an “angled brake track?” Thankfully I don’t need an angled brake track on my Jet 6+ wheels because the Turbine coating on the brake track stops wheels on a dime. And I don’t need to swap brake pads should I choose to swap out for a different pair of non-carbon wheels.

My original point stands – HED has no reason to launch a full carbon clincher because there is no performance benefit over their existing Jet+ Black Edition wheels.

Flatbiller
Flatbiller
8 years ago

And the winner is James…for mentioning lawsuit and Specialized in the same post.

Will the cliché ever end?

AlanM
AlanM
8 years ago
Reply to  Flatbiller

^ This.

pTymnWolfe
8 years ago
Reply to  Flatbiller

Reading comprehension 101- James is speculating that it may be Specialized getting sued by HED not the other way around. How is that cliche? Quite the opposite really. Even if it is cliche, that doesn’t make it any less true.

Eric Hansen
Eric Hansen
8 years ago

What is very likely is the company’s designs were arrived at independently, but were similar enough to be covered by one patent. Physics only works one way. A concurrent example is Shimano’s quick link. Shimano developed it entirely in house, but found their design was covered by a previous KMC patent, so they licensed it.

kbark
kbark
8 years ago

added comment so I can read comments

Dan Lind
8 years ago

Why can’t I see comments? #UGH

Zach Overholt
Admin
8 years ago
Reply to  Dan Lind

Hey Dan, we’ve been noticing a few issues with the comments. Please email editor@bikerumor.com to let us know what operating system/hardware you’re running so we can get to the bottom of it. Thanks!

thesteve4761
thesteve4761
8 years ago

Funny, not their first aero wheel relationship (Specialized tri spoke anybody?)

James
James
8 years ago

This is about the shape of the outside of the rim. Has nothing to do with the performance, or lack thereof, of carbon clinchers.
And there’s nothing wrong with carbon clinchers unless you ride mountains, which most of us don’t. Ive got more than 24,000 mile on carbon clinchers with no issues.
And yes, in fact they do out-perform carbon tubulars… for MY purposes. Lowest rolling resistance, at least with latex, better aerodynamics, lower cost for tires, lower tire repair/replacement cost.
Something else may be better for your riding conditions, but not mine, so don’t extend your biases to include my situation, because its inaccurate..

Dan Lind
8 years ago
Reply to  James

James, are you referring to MY reply to Veganpotter? I never said there are not performance benefits to carbon clinchers – just that there’s no difference between full carbon (like Zipp) or HED Jet Black Edition (carbon fairing bonded to aluminum rim with their Turbine brake surface.) I also never said there’s anything wrong with carbon clinchers, nor did I even compare clinchers to tubulars. Lastly, I did not extend any “inaccurate biases”…I simply said that HED’s new relationship with Specialized will not be leading to the production of carbon clinchers, which Veganpotter mentioned in his reply to your comment.

matthew moseley
matthew moseley
8 years ago

anyone know anything about the EEbrake Bontrager smart stop fiasco. concurrent development or blatant misappropriation?

Steve Benes
8 years ago

I spoke with Craig at eecycleworks when ordering a set of brakes and asked about that. It was a total rip-off on Trek’s part and they ignored him about it. That was in December of 2014.

brian
brian
8 years ago

It’s a shame Specialized doesn’t get the credit they deserve for sniffing out all the counterfeit product which pose huge safety concerns… ALL legitimate brands benefit from thier industry watchdog approach, because when a cease and desist or seizure of fake product goes down the guilty parties typically have knockoffs of all the top brands.. Sinyard just needs to hire a few savvy PR types to smooth over a few things before public opinion spins out of control…

Colin
Colin
8 years ago

Specialized claimed that the CLX wheels were faster than the HEDs. Interesting that they would take a step backwards…

H M
H M
8 years ago
Reply to  Colin

Its not about whether they are faster or not. The basic point is they used HED’s (now patented) work to develop them. So if they want to continue to sell them they need to licence from HED. The co-operation may (or may not) change the price HED is charging for that licence.

PS have you seen any of the big brands release an aero wheel *without* claiming that its the `best’. Think about it test every wheel at fifty different yaw angles and then come up with a way of weighting the results so that yours look the best.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.