Thomson’s been in the handlebar business for a few years now, we’ve reviewed both mountain bike and drop bar versions and liked them. These new alloy handlebars will be available in three versions – road, with a flattened wing shape on the tops; cyclocross with the 31.8 clamp diameter extending all the way out to the bend; and the “off road” drop bar, which gets massively flared drops.


The ‘cross version wasn’t shown because it’s still getting the shape finalized, but it’ll come in 38/40/42/44 centimeter widths. The road bar gets all but the 38 because the flattened wing section would be pointlessly short at that width. Road weights range 215-265g, cyclocross weights are TBD.


The off road bar will have 44 and 46 mm widths at the hoods, much wider in the drops. Weights are 270g and 280g. All available first of the year. Pricing should be around $110.


They’ve finally given in to market pressure and developed a carbon seatpost. It uses the same form factor as their alloy posts, but they say the fatigue life is much higher. It’ll be available in 330mm and 410mm lengths in 27.2, 30.9 and 31.6. The 27.2 is about 35g lighter than the alloy version, the 30.9 is about 10g heavier, but those weights are preproduction and subject to change once the layup is finalized. Available after first if the year, pricing TBD.


A new 25mm setback alloy seatpost option adds to the 0 and 16mm originals, and it’s still one piece. It’s 3D forged to get the extended shape, which is different than the extrusion process used to make their others, but it’s still a single piece of metal. Also available after first if the year, pricing TBD. It’s heavier thanks to the construction method, which yields a solid head, but there’ll be a carbon version eventually that should pull considerable weight out.


Dropper 2.0 is still 12-18 months out, but gets them even closer to zero failures. There’s no offset at the head, gets a more refined cartridge system that’ll be shop serviceable instead of having to come back to Thomson, and it might be less expensive…that’s the goal, but still too early to confirm.

The cartridge is still a nitrogen-over-hydraulic system with an IFP, but has fewer moving parts. The Motul oil and Trelleborg seals all remain, as do the Norglide bushings, so they’re hoping to bring their already low return rate to nearly zero.


The remote lever gets a big update, moving the engagement point inward for easier reach and letting you choose between upright (like the current one) or sideways to replace the front shifter lever. The same lever works both ways, you just flip it and replace the set bolt to lock it into place. It’ll be available as an aftermarket part for current levers in early 2017, but the updated posts won’t be out for quite some time. Thomson spent a LOT of time testing and refining the original before making it available because they knew it had to be 110% right, and we suspect they’ll do the same here. They say the lever feel is smoother and lighter, but that it retains the rock solid anti-rotation and wiggle qualities. So, basically, their current dropper post is very, very good (we’ve had one running smooth for a couple years now), so no need to delay a purchase waiting for 2.0.

Also in development are flat pedals, carbon stems and 35mm bars and stems, but they’re not offering any details on those projects yet.


    • dave on

      From the website, it appears that the aluminum posts and stems are made in their facility, everything else is asian made. The whole reason for Thomson’s success was the build quality. Why would I pay a premium for the Thomson name on the same old Taiwanese stuff everybody else has.

      • pooposauce on

        and whats funny is their stems, which are one of the few products they make in the USA, probably break the most. I can’t tell you how many people I know that have cracked a face plate. And yeah, lots of those folks had torque wrenches and used them.

        The microadjust on their AL seatposts are the hot noise though and are on all of my bikes. So there ya go Thomson. There’s one positive thing.

      • AngryBikeWrench on

        “Why would I pay a premium for the Thomson name on the same old Taiwanese stuff everybody else has.” This comment demonstrates near-total ignorance of what goes into overseas manufacturing. Do you really think Thomson is just slapping their label on an off-the-shelf carbon post?

      • ERIK on

        part of why you would still use this Thomson post is that they care about build quality… they go to a vendor that is the best in the business and an expert in this kind of a dropper-post system… Thomson is not an expert in producing dropper post internals… they know better than to try to do something like this on their own when they are not experts in it… duh-

        • monstercrosser on

          Thomson stems breaking??? Whatever. Been using them on a few bikes ever since they came out. Never once used a torque wrench. I weigh 230lbs or so depending. Can put out 1200 watts in a sprint. I’m not tiny. But I’ve never broken a face plate or anything else on a Thomson stem (or post for that matter)

  1. Volsung on

    $110 is twice the amount of Salsa Cowbells which look pretty much the same. However, my long fingers will probably like the 31.8 top part.

    A while ago they were talking about moving their carbon manufacturing to the US. I hope they do that with all their handlebars. I’m willing to pay more to support American manufacturing.

  2. A Little Woody on

    I dont run anything except Thomson seatposts because I’ve never had a problem. I appreciate that they try to manufacture some components here in the USA.

    Plus they’re dead sexy and have great customer service.


COMMENT HERE: (For best results, log in through Wordpress or your social media account. Anonymous/fake email comments may be unapproved or deleted. ALL first-time commenter's posts are held for moderation. Check our Comment Policy for full details.)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.