“There’s no way this thing will actually work.” That was the thought going through my head almost every step of the way during this review. But apparently it does work, even though the concept is just so weird to even wrap your head around it. We’ve all seen oval rings or some variation, but all of those rings offer symmetry for each leg. The Spreng Reng is completely different, and that’s the point.

Review: Spreng Reng pedals smoother w/ improved asymmetric chainring design

V25. The ‘aha’ moment.


As I touched on in my last post in June, the Spreng Reng is the brainchild of Doug Brown Jr. who calls himself a chainring connoisseur. Coming up with the idea of the Spreng Reng was one thing, but designing, prototyping, and explaining how the ring actually works is a whole different story. Throughout the project, Doug has enlisted the help of mechanical engineers like Josh Yablon with Paul Hammerstrom Design to turn his wild idea into reality.

The initial theory of the ring is that the combination of the 39t for your dominant leg and 36t for your non-dominant leg actually allows you to turn the pedals at a higher cadence but with less effort resulting in improved climbing. This dynamic ratio allows you to power through the larger radius faster than you normally would which briefly accelerates the bike, then you get a bit of a break with the smaller radius which helps to keep your cadence up. Essentially, you are able to pedal through the larger radius at the higher cadence provided by the smaller radius.

This is then a give and take; the smaller radius side allows you to speed up your cadence, while the larger radius side then transfers that higher cadence into higher speed through more gear rollout. The result is supposedly the ability to ‘spin’ a harder gear than you would typically run with less fatigue.

Doug contends that this ring also reduces the amount of work in the 36t section thanks to more mechanical advantage and an effectively longer crank arm since the distance between the pedal and the point of work (chainring teeth) is 6mm longer in the 36t zone than the 39t zone. He also claims that other ring designs offer either increased gear speed or gear torque multiplication, but not both at the same time. But at the same time he says that “this ring is not magic. We’re not breaking the laws of physics here.”

Review: Spreng Reng pedals smoother w/ improved asymmetric chainring design

First impressions with V20

Ultimately, what I experienced with the V20 chainring in the last story was one of Doug’s biggest hurdles. That chainring did seem to provide benefits in terms of higher cadence and increased speed, but the resulting ride feel could be best described as “lumpy or lopey”. As the chainring would morph from an effective 36t to 39t profile, the change in radius led to what Doug refers to as the “foot stab” feeling just before the deadspot for the non-dominant leg. For me, this resulted in a ride that would leave the bike pulling to one side as the chainring went in and out of the power stroke. The more power you put down, the more the bike seemed to move. In every one of my tests the V20 ring was faster than a standard round ring, but the ride was not something I would want to live with.

Review: Spreng Reng pedals smoother w/ improved asymmetric chainring design

Getting Smoother

Enter V25 (and V26, and so on…). By shortening the 39t power stroke by two teeth, and slightly enlarging the dead spot radius (increasing from a 35t to 36t profile in this area), the V25 is a trade off in terms of outright performance for a smoother pedal stroke. On the road, the difference is remarkable. Thanks to the smoother profile, the V25 is noticeably better in terms of ride feel and feels a lot more like a normal chainring – but the benefits still seem to be included.

Review: Spreng Reng pedals smoother w/ improved asymmetric chainring design

Review: Spreng Reng pedals smoother w/ improved asymmetric chainring design

Flat spot of V20 above, vs more rounded section of V25 below.

Doug pointed out that they had an ‘aha’ moment once they started making the V20 rings out of thicker aluminum because it required an interior machined shoulder. This shoulder made the flat spots in the ring design (which caused that lopey feel) much more visible than in their previous stainless steel prototypes or drawings, and led to the rounder profile of the V25. After dertermining the cause of the “foot stab” , the solution was implemented by Josh Yablon’s further refinement of the design. Doug states that once they identified the cause, their greatest concern was figuring out a way to solve the issue within the constraints of the Spreng Reng’s design and the chain ring’s pre-determined chain pitch dimensions.

Just like the V20, and the prototype I rode before that, the V25 encourages almost forces you to ride a higher gear than you would normally select for the terrain. This is coupled with an increase in cadence that allows you to turn over the larger profile of the power stroke. The V25 combines 75° of rotation in the 39t power stroke, and then transitions to the smaller 36t radius for 199° of rotation, before transitioning back to 39t (changed from 93° and 124° respectively). V25 also changes the position of the transition area between the 36 and 39t profiles from 10° to 53° in relation to the dominant leg crank arm. Doug points out that this was not conducive for dead spot radius reduction nor power output, but had to be done to smooth the pedal stroke.

Chainring Average Speed Maximum speed Lap Time Lap Notes
V20 36-39t 15.7 mph 33.8 mph 59:17:00 One construction crew with one lane blocked, had to stop
V25 36-39t 16.2 mph 37.3 mph 57:40:00 Two construction crews with one lane blocked, had to stop at one, slow for the second. Traffic was crazy at the end due to school letting out.
38t Round Ring 15.5 mph 33.4 mph 1:00:15 Lighter traffic, construction crews were done for the day. Colder, added a vest.

Testing, Testing

In order to test the rings for myself, I’ve done a number of tests – and every time the Spreng Reng came out on top. That’s regardless of whether I started with a round ring during back to back testing, or finished with the round ring, and even true when I was consciously trying to go faster with the round ring.

Review: Spreng Reng pedals smoother w/ improved asymmetric chainring design

All of my testing was completed on the same bike – my 1x Volagi Viaje.

My latest test is outlined in the chart above, and started with a V20, then the V25, and finished with a round 38t ring to split the difference of the 36-39t Spreng Reng profile. Each lap was run on the exact same bike set up with the exception of the chainring, and the exact same 15.59 mile loop out on the road. These laps were all run back to back to back, with enough time in between to change out the ring and catch my breath. Since this was open road testing, the traffic conditions weren’t exactly the same, but interestingly, the lap with the most traffic and delays was actually the fastest – with the V25.

Obviously, a single rider with a handful of tests hardly makes for scientific testing, but it was interesting to see that in all of my testing the Spreng Reng was consistently ahead – even when it actually felt slower. On the last lap, it was getting colder and there was a threat for very cold rain, so I consciously tried to pick up the pace to make it home more quickly. To me, it felt like the round ring was much faster on the flats, but looking at the results it was actually slower in most of the sectors. And in spite of trying, I didn’t make it home any faster.

Also of interest, the V20 was actually the fastest ring up the steepest climb on the loop. We’re only talking a few seconds on a two minute climb, but it brings up an interesting point. The V20 has more dead spot radius reduction than the V25 which provides greater benefit from the ring. The tradeoff is that this increases the lumpy feel of the pedal stroke, so you seem to actually be giving up a bit of performance on the steepest climbs from the V20 to gain the smoother feel of the V25. However, that was really the only spot on the course that it was faster, with the V25 faster overall.

Review: Spreng Reng pedals smoother w/ improved asymmetric chainring design

V26 drops to a two tooth variance between the power stroke and the dead spot radius for even smoother pedaling, but potentially less benefit.

V26… and beyond?

Which brings us to the V26. Before I had even finished testing the V25, Doug had already sent a V26 which narrows the difference between the two tooth profiles from 3 to 2t. Try wrapping your head around that. The thought is that this would further smooth the pedal stroke though at the expense of some of the ring’s benefits. Doug thinks that this could lead to use as an outer ring as well, potentially with the V25 as an inner ring. Or for use with 1x drivetrains. Since all of my testing was done as a 1x system, I will say that I noticed it seemed to be harder to find the ideal gear ratio in more situations than with a round ring. The Spreng Reng encourages you to ride a harder gear, and sometimes that means jumping to the next gear on the cassette which is a little too big. Doug claims a smaller tooth variance design would lessen this effect making it a better option for 1x.

Review: Spreng Reng pedals smoother w/ improved asymmetric chainring design

V25 still had adjustable positioning with smaller slotted holes. Like all of the previous versions, you can run the ring positioned for left or right leg dominance.

It also is not the easiest ring to mount thanks to the ‘banana holes’ – but that would change for production. While the banana holes were good for testing different positions for prototyping, they require far too much torque to prevent the chainring from slipping and would never work with light weight cranksets, rings, and hardware. Because of that, if this ring ever makes it to production, Doug envisions it with single chainring holes lined up in a way so that each successive position corresponds to one chainring tooth. V25 had a slightly revised hole pattern, but even these would allow the ring to slip.

Review: Spreng Reng pedals smoother w/ improved asymmetric chainring design

For the most part, I rode it set up as left leg dominant. I did experiment with it the other way around though. To me it felt much more natural with the power stroke on my dominant leg.

Dominant or Non-Dominant – Does it matter?

While the Spreng Reng was initially described to me as a larger ring for your dominant leg, it turns out that the dominant/non-dominant aspect might not be all that important. I asked Doug if he had stats on the average left/right power balance of riders and what would happen if someone had a perfect 50/50 balance, and his answer was surprising. He pointed out that the dominant leg might not actually be any stronger, it might just feel that way and you should just use what you feel is your ‘strong foot’. But even if you did have a 50/50 split, he says that “you would still benefit due to a.)  the additional rotational degrees of dead spot radius reduction (as compared to any other chain ring design that [Doug] is aware of), b.)  an “effective” 6mm longer crank arm for one leg, and c.)  additional gear torque multiplication – all of which combine to provide a faster cadence through the larger 39t radius section providing more gear rollout and therefore an increase in speed.”

Final Thoughts

In all honesty, I rode V20 because I had to – but when I was done, I couldn’t wait to get it off my bike (full disclosure, I’m not a huge fan of oval rings either). The success of the V25 is illustrated in the fact that it’s still on my bike and I plan to ride it a while longer to continue testing. In spite of the fact that the V20 was actually the fastest on the steepest climb on the route, the lumpy pedal stroke is just not something I want to live with. But if further testing revealed that it’s not just me and the V25 was indeed noticeably faster without feeling like you’re pedaling a chainring shaped like an eggplant, the concept could indeed turn into a viable product. This is certainly one of those products you have to ride to believe.

So what does that mean for the future of the Spreng Reng concept? As far as Doug is aware, there is currently nothing else like this out there according to both U.S. and European Patent Office searches. The ring is a long way from being offered for sale as a finished product, but Doug hopes to have the development work already completed so that a potential licensee could write a check and be manufacturing the ring almost immediately. That’s the hope, anyways. In the meantime, Doug says he plans to continue to develop the idea and refine it for multiple applications like inner and outer rings, 1x rings, etc. Who knows, maybe you’ll see Spreng Reng shaped chainrings on your favorite cranks in the not too distant future!


  1. Justin White on

    I realized the “maintaining the high cadence of the small radius through the big radius of the power area” was occurring with a “normal” oval ring, and also realized that was why even though instant power seemed higher, long-term power fell off way too fast. You’re really tricking body into pushing a higher cadence through and effectively higher gear that you can normally run that cadence, which in the end is going to mean your body tries to put out more power than it actually can!

  2. jasonmiles31 on

    Interesting that Spreng Reng is almost crowd sourcing their product development. I genuinely love the fact that my viewing ads on this site is funding their product development. I hope it leads to something groundbreaking.

    It would be really cool if bike review sites eventually morphed into open source product development for all the big brands, but I doubt many companies will like having their product development failures broadcast to the general public.

  3. Vincent on

    Being a biker, physicist and technology teacher. User of Rotor 1st and 2nd decoupling mechanism and Q-rings and being not completely satisfied. I think it’s the solution I’ve been dreaming so many years. I’m willing to buy the ring right now (no questions asked). I don’t know how to get in contact. If anyone can help please address to vincent.miquel01@gmail.com

  4. Ed Llorca on

    So they claim it works even if your legs are the same but you ‘think’ of one as dominant? Lost all credibility right there. BS aside if you have a big power diff in your legs this is an interesting product.

      • record11 on

        This hearkens back to the days of BioPace.If I recall correctly it was causing knee issues. Now it seems that the past has come back around (again).

        I do have to wonder what would happen if these were mounted to Power Cranks….now that would be a total internet fight….

  5. Doug Brown Jr. on

    Ed, additional mechanical advantage, gear torque multiplication, rotational degrees of dead spot radius reduction, and “dynamic” gear roll out, all of which this design provides, make the work of powering a bike easier. It is quite simply a better “simple machine”. What Zach experienced with the round vs. Version 25 can easily be explained. A perception that you are doing more work (i.e. with a round ring) leads to a perception that you must be going faster. As you can see, that was not so. And he is right in that until you have ridden this chain ring design it is hard to truly believe what it can provide. Or in other words it is not easily explained in writing. Thanks.

  6. Eggs Benedict on

    So your strong leg gets stronger. It’s an enabler chain ring for your weak leg.

    But if this is the only way one can cycle due to a serious strength imbalance, then it’s probably a good product.

  7. Eli on

    I’m wondering about long term impact of this. One or two rides is great as your body hasn’t really adapted to the change yet. (muscle growth, etc) But if you used this for a full year you’re only training the imbalance further

    • Zach Overholt on

      Yeah, I’ve wondered about that too. However, if that was the case, you can flip the ring so that it’s opposite on training rides and focus on training your non-dominant leg more than dominant. I rode the ring that way a good amount for the first story, and it’s super weird at first (more so than the other way around), but then you start getting used to it. I almost wonder if there’s a bigger market for this as a training aid to increase the strength of your non-dominant leg than the reverse.

  8. Doug Brown Jr. on

    Eli, interesting comment. The design is not intended to be used every day, only for races, hilly days in the mountains, or special events. You are correct in your implication in that I only ride it occasionally but train on a regular round ring that is at least a 39t radius which is the maximum of the Version 25 even though we can scale the design up or down by gear range. There is no adaptation period required because it does not require an adaptation period to do less work on the bike which is what the design provides. For example, I’ve been riding a 40t inner ring (from Peter White Cycles) for the last month and since I anticipate a “spirited” group ride tomorrow I am installing the Spreng Reng today.

  9. Joel H on

    I would be concerned about one leg getting a different workout than the other over time, I don’t want to have to worry about left leg day versus right leg day


COMMENT HERE: (For best results, log in through Wordpress or your social media account. Anonymous/fake email comments may be unapproved or deleted. ALL first-time commenter's posts are held for moderation. Check our Comment Policy for full details.)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.