Home > Bike Types > Gravel Bikes

Patent Patrol: What does a Shimano GRX hydro junction do?

Shimano sub-lever assemblyFIG.1 shows how the main brake lever and the sub-lever both attach via independent hoses to the T-junction. From there, a third hose runs to the caliper. That means either brake lever can actuate the same caliper.
11 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

My long-term review of Shimano GRX Di2 will be hitting the airwaves here at Bikerumor very soon. In it, I mention the notable braking power of the sub-levers that live on the bar tops. These levers now sit in line with the main brake levers and the hydraulic fluid from the master cylinder flows through the sub-levers.

With the T-junction outlined in this patent, each lever can operate independently of the other. And, notably, only one of the brake levers requires a fluid reservoir.

Separating GRX’s integrated brakes

Shimano sub-lever assembly
FIG.1 shows how the main brake lever and the sub-lever both attach via independent hoses to the T-junction. From there, a third hose runs to the caliper. That means either brake lever can actuate the same caliper.

Shimano devised an excellent in-line solution for adding a braking position to your handlebars for its GRX groupset. The sub-levers live on the bar flats and give you a great braking feel without having to plant your hands on the hoods.

Now Shimano is refining the braking dynamics of the system by adding an apparent inline junction. This T-shaped junction connects the hose from the sub-lever and the main brake lever, and connects both via a single hose to the caliper.

The question is, why add this extra component to a system that already works wonderfully?

But why?

As Shimano states in the patent, the patent outlines a system in which “an actuating device and an additional actuating device can be selectively used to operate a single hydraulic operating device.”

The junction features a pivoting guide inside that essentially closes off one of the brake master cylinder systems when the other is activated. For example, if you’re using the sub-lever to actuate the brake, the pivoting guide will swing to close the hydraulic fluid in the main brake lever’s system before it meets the junction. And vice versa: actuating the main lever will shut down the fluid system from the sub-lever.

Notably, the pivoting guide prevents whichever lever that’s not being activated from losing hydraulic pressure.

GRX sub lever with junction
FIG.4 shows a sub-lever connected to the junction. It pushes hydraulic fluid against the pivoting guide, which closes off the hydraulic system from the other side.

You can also use an open hydraulic system lever with another open hydraulic system lever, or you can use an open hydraulic system lever (with a main reservoir) and a lever with a closed hydraulic system. An open system features a reservoir of fluid and air that accommodates heat expansion. A closed system lever features no reservoir, just a piston that pushes on a fixed volume of fluid.

T-junction benefits

That means you can use a different lever — rather than the GRX sub-lever — within the system. You could, for example, use a Shimano Deore brake lever as your sub-lever, which offers a larger brake lever and some more adjustment options.

And you should be able to configure the actuation ratios of each lever independently. You can make the sub-levers more positive and sensitive, for example, than the main levers.

A guess, based on my GRX experience

Closed hydraulic system
FIG.5 shows a configuration in which the main brake lever is an open system with a reservoir, and the sub-lever is a closed system with no reservoir.

The second reason is a conjecture, and it addresses something I experienced in my year-long review of GRX. The problem: if you decide you don’t want or need the sub-levers after you’ve installed them, you’re going to have a bit of surgery to do in order to remove them. From there, you’ll need to re-run a hose just for the brake levers at the drops.

While the sub-levers feel great and do exactly what they promise, I found I didn’t really need them. Yet they’re still on my handlebars because I don’t want to do the surgery.

The solution: The T-junction. Of course, this assumes it’s possible to simply block off the input port that would otherwise accept the sub-lever’s hose. You can basically install this T-junction into the hose run between your main brake lever and the caliper. Then, if you decide to use the sub-levers, you can simply run a hose between the sub-lever and the T-junction in the main hose run.

At least that’s what I’m hoping you can do here. It certainly would be nifty to be able to add the sub-levers for a race or long ride when I want them, and remove them the rest of the time.

But primarily, it seems the GRX T-junction is designed to allow you to tailor the braking feel between the two brake systems and open up more options for various lever configurations (like using a closed or open system lever).

Patent research assistance provided by Wheelbased.com. Check them out for deeper dives on some of these patents and more.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Milessio
Milessio
3 years ago

Interesting the return of the fad for sub-levers.
Seems like you could fit a quick-release coupling for the sub levers?
Might then be ideal for fitting brake levers to tri-bars (!)?

Chris White
3 years ago

3rd possible reason for this patent: Shimano are making patents for every conceivable variation on the idea to stop their competitors being able to offer anything similar.
I use the GRX bar-top on my gravel bike and find them very useful, not for braking in the technical stuff, but just general cruising, holding the bike steady when stopped at lights on a gradient, etc. If you’re not used to having them mounted there and it isn’t a natural response to reach for them, then you probably won’t use them much, though. There are basically no downsides to them (except for the extra-tricky bleed and getting the hose lengths right during the initial install). And no, the marginal weight gain is not going to make a real difference to your riding experience or speed.

brian
brian
3 years ago

Kind of crazy that people in the market for this high-end groupset would need those crutch levers. Seems like it would be better just to improve your fit at the hoods. Less is more IMO

Rodrigo Diaz
Rodrigo Diaz
3 years ago
Reply to  brian

While I don’t use them myself, I know a lot of cyclocross riders that prefer to have an additional set of bars on the tops for control over very bumpy surfaces. Also easier to “move” the front end around, like hopping barriers, if your hands are there.

So maybe less is not more for them. And as usual – you are never forced to add extra terminals to your “core” setup. Like extra blips on your eTap.

andrewfelixrose
andrewfelixrose
3 years ago

Couldn’t you just cut the hose and plug it?

Volsung
Volsung
3 years ago

If I flip it around maybe I can control hydraulic rim brakes and disc brakes on the same wheel.

John
John
3 years ago

I’ve been running second brake levers on Hakkalugi for years. One forgotten benefit is safety- I can brake faster in situations where I’m holding top of bars ( don’t have to be in my hoods to brake). If you ride on a mix of city paths, street, trails, gravel you would end up using the extra brakes.

Sebastian
Sebastian
2 years ago

I’ve had mechanical sub-levers on my gravel bike for four years now.

The main levers definitely offer more control while braking. The hand position for using the sub levers is too narrow to be used in rough terrain.

However I would still recommend sub-levers for riding in cities or anywhere where you should always be ready to brake.
When riding outside a city you can easily use the tops without having to worry about being able to break at any moment. However in a city this can lead to serious crashes, so you’re either forced to ride on the hoods or drops or accept not being able to break in time and endanger yourself and others.
For short rides in the city it’s perfectly fine to not use the tops, but on long rides, having them available is definitely nice.

And whether you need these levers or not, it’s great to have the option.

Boop
Boop
1 year ago

Is the SHIMANO GRX Hydraulic Disc Sub Brake Lever (BL-RX812-R) compatible with the Shimano Tiagra 4700 Groupset?

ZizaJaun
ZizaJaun
1 year ago

This would be great for putting levers on the extensions of the Oyster Bar, to give MTB-level control in technical sections: https://bikepacking.com/news/oyster-bar-handlebar/

ZizaJaun
ZizaJaun
1 year ago

Any word on if/when this will be released? Or anything else that can perform the same job in the meantime?

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.