Home > Event Coverage > Sea Otter Classic

Confirmed: Prototype Fox 32″ Fork Spotted at Sea Otter

3 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

We’re here at Sea Otter, and there are quite a few new 32″ tires, wheels, and frames to be found floating around the booths. And while plenty of rumors have circulated about major suspension manufacturers working on 32″ mountain bike suspension forks, we haven’t really seen much beyond some spy shots and some some franken-forks with cut and bonded lowers. Earlier today, Cory spotted a rideable Fox 34 SL 32″ fork on an Ari Signal Peak 32″ prototype bike in a Quarter HP post.

the ARi prototype on display at Sae Otter.
Ari’s prototype on display in their booth.

Before even being made aware of Cory’s article, I wandered over to the Ari booth at Sea Otter, where the Signal Peak 32″ alloy prototype was on display. The fork didn’t have any stickers or branding, but it looked suspiciously like a Fox 34 SL with its generative arch design. Then I noticed the distinctive blue compression knob with the words “Grip SL” printed on it, along with the blue air spring top cap, which were a dead giveaway. Still, the Ari folks were very happy to talk about the bike, but remained very tight-lipped about the fork.

Shortly after, while visiting with the Fox suspension folks, they happened to have another of the Ari Signal Peak prototype frames built up with the same fork. But this one was dressed up with Fox’s bright orange RAD (Racing Applications Development) stickers. When pressed, the Fox folks admitted that it was, in fact, a rideable prototype that they have been testing for some time. While it certainly looks production-ready, they didn’t provide a timeline for production. We’re assuming that it’s probably still a ways out, perhaps spring ’27, but will likely be spotted on the many 32″ XC bikes that we’ll be seeing in the not-too-distant future.

Beyond that, both of the Ari 32″ prototypes I saw had unique-looking prototype negative-rise Race Face stems to compensate for the larger front wheel. Fox’s bike also had a set of Race Face branded wheels with its own Vault hubs, so those are also clearly ride ready prototypes as well. The bright red Raicam Racing brakes aren’t a common sight, either. I had a chance to ride Fox’s bike up and down a crowded pathway between the booths, which was my first time on 32″ wheels. It was paved and there were lots of people around, so I can’t say that I took much away from the experience, other than that the fork was definitely functional.

the prototype 32" Fox fork on a prototype Ari Signal Peak mountain bike at Sea Otter.
The 32″ Fox 34 prototype fork is finally out from the behind the curtain, and it’s going to add some momentum to the 32″ already speedy development of 32″ bikes.

Regardless, it’s clear that Fox has been working hard behind the scenes and that its first 32″ suspension fork is much closer to reality than we knew. Until now, Fox has done a darn good job of keeping it under wraps, but it doesn’t seem like they’re trying to keep it a secret anymore. Again, it’s not clear when it’s coming, but it will certainly be an important piece of the puzzle for getting more 32″ bikes to market when it becomes available.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pawel
Pawel
6 days ago

I am curious if Fox introduce 80mm option for 32er. With bigger rollover capability 80mm seems to be reasonable solution.

Cloxxki
Cloxxki
6 days ago
Reply to  Pawel

Salsa calls their Fargo32 “80mm corrected” with a 505 mm 29″ fork they already had laying around.
If you just roll and not really jump, indeed 80 mm could suffice.
A 100 mm fork can usually be lowered in some matter, though?

While a shorter fork will help some with stack, a handlebar can do that as well.
Is a 80mm fork better in some meaningful way than 100mm or 120mm, though?
I ride 29″/100mm and I’m not sure.
Hoping I’ll be able to suffice with a rigid carbon fork on 32″, to be honest. Heaps of money and weight savings and a bit more feel for the trail.
Tires trending wider is hopeful. Might good rolling 2.6 tires be next?

Daniel
Daniel
5 days ago
Reply to  Pawel

Going by the rims beat seat diameter 32″ wheels have 32mm /1.25″ larger radius than 29ers. There is a video out there where Quinn from pinkbike testrides the Ari 32″ with said Fox fork and he talked about 90mm of travel. That makes sense in that converting a 120mm 29er fork for 32″ wheels will reduce the possible travel by the difference in the radius of the larger wheel.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.