Home > Other Fun Stuff > Actual Weights

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

14 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Every year it’s the same story. As fall rolls around, riders bubble over with excitement that #crossiscoming. But when it’s finally here, it helps if you have your bike dialed in and ready to go. For me, a cyclocross bike is not something that I will use year ’round. You totally could use it all year for gravel and commuting missions, but I think it’s fair to assume that a lot of cyclocross bikes spend at least half of the year hung from the rafters collecting dust.

That made me wonder – what’s the cheapest way to get into a cyclocross bike while still getting a race worthy CX machine that won’t let you down on the weekend? We’ve reviewed a lot of carbon CX race machines, but for the most part they’ve all had fairly steep price tags. Which led me to question – what’s out there for less than two grand? Less than $1,500? 

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

Meet the Framed Course Carbon. On paper, it’s almost everything you’d want from CX race bike. A full “high modulus” carbon frame with a matching full carbon fork complete with tapered 1 1/8 – 1.5″ steerer tube. Thru axles at both ends (100 x 15mm and 142 x 12mm). Disc brakes. A 1x drivetrain. It seems that the Course is a steal – which is exactly why I wanted to ride it.

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

Starting with the frame, the Course Carbon is shapely with slender stays and a flat-ish top tube that offers plenty of mud clearance around the stock 700c x 33mm Maxxis Mud Wrestler tires. Running internal cable routing through the frame and the fork, the frame openings have bolt on cable guides to prevent rattling and guide the housings through the tubes.

Shipped as a 1x (also available as 2x), the Course still has the ability to run a front derailleur with a braze on mount plus an opening for a bottom pull front derailleur cable in front of the rear wheel. A BB386 EVO bottom bracket offers a wide stance from the chainstays for improved power transfer and room for more mud clearance. And even though this is a race frame, twin bottle cage mounts inside the front triangle should help for those long training days.

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

Post mount disc brakes are found at both ends, with a 160mm rotor up front and 140mm out back. To keep the costs down, mechanical SRAM BB7 Road calipers are used which mate up with a mechanical SRAM Rival 11 speed group with a dedicated 1x front brake lever.

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

Rounding out the drivetrain, you’ll find a SRAM Rival 1x rear derailleur moving the KMC 11 speed chain up and down the SRAM NX 11-42 cassette, while an FSA Gossamer Cross 386 EVO crank with a 44t Megatooth chainring keeps things in check up front. Normally, I’d feel that 44t would be too big for my ‘cross needs, but with the 11-42 cassette it seems to work pretty well (if you’re ok with big gear steps).

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

The cockpit is mostly Framed in-house parts with their Cross aluminum compact drop bar, aluminum 100mm +6° stem, a carbon set back seat post, and a Selle Italia X1 Flow saddle. FSA bar tape completes the front, but for me this had to go almost immediately – it was just too hard. Replacing the tape also allowed me to reroute the shift cable which was positioned so that it rested under your palm while on the hoods instead of in front of the bar.

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

Completing the stock build are wheels built with Alex Draw 2.1 32h aluminum rims, 2.0 stainless spokes with brass nipples, and Framed sealed bearing Pub Hubs. Shipped with tubes and non-tubeless Maxxis Mud Wrestler tires, this is really the only downer about the spec. But it’s one of the reasons the price is so low.

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheelsHands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

Which gives you budget to upgrade – to something like the Framed Pub Carbon cross/gravel wheels. Hand built in the Framed US headquarters, the Pub carbon wheels feature a 31mm deep, tubeless ready rim profile that measures 21mm internal with a slight bead hook.

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

Using an asymmetric profile, the rims have a flat section for the spoke bed and for the tubeless valve (which wasn’t included, so I used some of the new valves from Orange Seal. The rims do come pre-taped though). The 28 spoke rims were laced two cross to DT Swiss 350 thru axle Centerlock hubs with DT Swiss Competition spokes and nipples. Obviously, you could order these with an XD freehub body for SRAM/e*thirteen cassettes, but the NX cassette uses the standard HG splined freehub so that’s what was sent.

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

The result is a pair of wheels with rim tape that came in at 1710g for the set (840g ft, 870g rr) which sell between $899 and $999 for the set depending on the options. The wheels above list for $899. However, you also have the option to buy this bike with the carbon wheels as stock instead of the aluminum wheels for $2099 which is a $300 discount on the wheels.

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

With the original aluminum wheels and tubed tires installed, the complete Framed Course Carbon in a 51cm frame came in at 19lb 6oz (8.78kg). Adding the Carbon Pub wheels dropped the Course into the 18’s.

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

In regards to the sizing, my advice would be to stick to your traditional measurements rather than rely on the current size chart on the-house.com. At 5’7″ with a 30″ inseam, the chart puts me on a 54cm. I knew that would be way too big, so I went with the 51cm frame, but even that is a bit on the large size. The frames seem to run large (54cm top tube on the 51cm frame) so keep that in mind when choosing.

Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels Hands On: Framed Course Carbon cyclocross bike and Pub Carbon tubeless cross wheels

Straight out of the box, I’ve been fairly impressed with the Course Carbon. From the excellent packing job, to the build, the Course has exceeded all expectations – especially for a bike priced at $1,499.95 ($2,099 with the carbon wheels if you buy them together). Whether that makes it a solid candidate for a race rig remains to be seen, but I’ll follow up soon with the full review when I find out.

*Note that Framed is in the process of updating their website, so currently you won’t find the Course Carbon or the Pub Carbon gravel wheels on their site – but you will find them in stock, and for sale on the-house.com which is the exclusive online retailer of Framed bikes.

the-house.com

framedbikes.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ffjhdfcg
Ffjhdfcg
7 years ago

Isn’t the top tube length a more important metric than inseam for determining proper fit?????

Chader
Chader
7 years ago
Reply to  Ffjhdfcg

Yes, ETT is a better measurement to consider since it is far less adjustable than seat height.

But Reach (and Stack) are becoming the defacto standard for sizing bikes these days, for a variety of reasons.

The inseam is still hanging on purely because it is a measurement that people generally know about themselves where ETT, Reach and Stack don’t readily correspond to a commonly known physical size.

There are sizing systems based on a persons size that can translate to the proper range of sizes, but they take some effort to perform and apply.

Gfgjdtggy
Gfgjdtggy
7 years ago
Reply to  Chader

Perhaps the question of inseam was not as straight forward as it could have been, most experts I think would agree that the fitting of “cockpit “ is FAR more important than verifying stand over clearance. Said another way, if the cockpit sizing is properly addressed then the stand over clearance should be fine if the rider is not too much of an annomoly, so focusing on stand over clearance is not too helpful

Linc
Linc
7 years ago

List 48 cm frame in geometry chart. No where to be found when shopping.

Matt
Matt
7 years ago
Reply to  Linc

I see it listed here. http://www.the-house.com/qfrcocr148bb17zz-framed-bikes.html I think it says 1 left because they may be waiting on a part to complete the build, since these are hand assembled to order at the Framed Bikes facility.

Steve Jensen
Steve Jensen
7 years ago

Would not top tube length be a far more important metric for sizing compared to inseam??????

Matt
Matt
7 years ago
Reply to  Steve Jensen

I would agree, but since these bikes are sold direct to consumer online it’s difficult to ask a customer to measure their preferred ETT prior to purchase. As far as I know there isn’t a method to measure someone’s preferred ETT short of a pro bike fit, and even then it’s either comfort or performance based. If you know your preferred ETT then you don’t need the sizing chart. If you’re not going to pay for a bike fit someplace, then the sizing chart gives the customer a good starting point.

Sam
Sam
7 years ago

Curious how the FSA NW chainring works out, since the only other option would be to swap the entire crankset.

Tomi
Tomi
7 years ago

Now that the gravel and CX catalog have split their way I’d see a CX frame come stock with tubular wheels than tubeless.

steve
steve
7 years ago

Seriously, why can’t they publish the reach and wheelbase measurements. Is it hat hard to get a tape measure out. That information is vital for figure out fit if your like me and in between sizes.

Dude
Dude
7 years ago

This is an open mold frame, yeah?

patrick
patrick
7 years ago

Flip the darn bike upside down and show us the measured tire clearance. You would think an 86mm wide bottom bracket shell would provide loads of clearance, but Felt showed us that’s not the case. Why do we have constant cyclocross bike reviews always mentioning tire clearance and never measuring it?

RobertW
RobertW
7 years ago

Good price, disappointing tire clearance. I wouldn’t buy a frame that I couldn’t put a 29×1.9 tire on.

tim
tim
1 year ago

What is the Thru Axle that fit the Course Carbon fork with 15×100 axle? I tried 120mm M15xP1.5 Thru Axle but pitch is not 1.5.

Please help!

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.