Home > Other Fun Stuff > Prototypes & Concepts

Lauf Patents an Infinitely Engaging Rear Hub Design

patent drawing for lauf rear hub with integrated pawls.
23 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

OK, so, technically this new Lauf Cycles rear hub design could have “thousands” of points of engagement per rotation, but that might as well be infinite. Also known as instantaneous.

Either way, the effect is that the hub will engage so quickly that it will feel immediate, and it does this with a very clever staggered, potentially “elastic” pawl design that also softens engagement and can be located throughout the hub’s entire shell.

Oh, and it does all of this without magnets or springs.

How Lauf’s hub design works

patent drawing for lauf rear hub with integrated pawls.

The basic premise uses integrated pawls (701) made on an inner ring, each essentially its own spring with a toothed hook at the end to engage with the teeth (105) on the drive ring (102).

However, it could also place the pawls on the outer ring and put the drive ring on the inner surface:

patent drawing for lauf rear hub with integrated pawls.

The pawls are staggered to engage at different points in the hubs rotation, effectively creating more points of engagement with fewer-but-larger teeth. This is how many current hubs work, usually having two or three pawls engaged at any point in time. For hubs that don’t need ultra-quick engagement, the pawls could be wider (Fig. 5b).

patent drawing for lauf rear hub with integrated pawls.

For quicker engagement, a second set of pawls could be offset from the first set (blue & orange image on right). Or…

patent drawing for lauf rear hub with integrated pawls.

…they could even use three sets for even faster engagement (Fig.12). Alternatively, they could use two or three rings in sync to increase strength because, admittedly, these pawls would have to be pretty thin to fit into a traditional hub design. Assuming that’s what Lauf has in mind, let’s stay on that track for a moment.

Stretchy, Wavy Pawls

patent drawing for lauf rear hub with integrated pawls.

Another tactic for improving total engagement and strength is to use a wavy shape, allowing each pawl to “stretch” slightly, just enough such that one set engages first, then they stretch until the second set engages, then those stretch until a third set engages.

The benefit to this is that you have more engagement all the way around the hub, reducing lateral stresses between the cassette and freehub and hub shell.

patent drawing for lauf rear hub with integrated pawls.

And, assuming you apply too much torque, that wavy design allows the pawl to breakaway before it snaps. No, that would not be pleasant for you, but it would theoretically preserve your hub. However, take a look at Fig. 13 above for a second, and then scroll down…

Thousands of Pawls, Full-Width Freehub Bodies

patent drawing for lauf rear hub with integrated pawls.

What if you filled the entire hub shell with rows of pawls, providing a massive amount of contact area, each slightly staggered but also able to stretch to allow other rows of pawls to also engage?

Not only would this create insanely fast engagement, but it would provide insanely solid engagement, too. Lauf says this also provides a much greater tolerance for pawls and ratchets being out of sync, which they say often are due to real-world manufacturing limitations.

And, because it allows for a full-width freehub body that’s essentially a second axle, it would make the entire assembly far more robust, too. Figures 15-20 show a variety of design options where multiple rows of pawls fit in various places and allow for a wider variety of freehub-to-hub shell interfaces.

Lauf also says the “stretch” of each pawl allows your power to come on gradually (still very quickly, mind you), which eliminates that loud KLUNK, particularly on hubs with lower engagement speeds. This may actually reduce wear and tear on your drivetrain, too.

While Lauf is known for their bikes and forks, they’re always tinkering. Their likely goal is to license this design rather than become a hub brand, too, but we’ve been surprised by them before, so who knows?

LaufCycles.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
seraph
1 month ago

More POE = more drag. 😐

Robin
Robin
1 month ago
Reply to  seraph

A lower normal force between a pawl and teeth means less friction and less drag. What’s the lesson? Hub drag is not a function of a single factor. That means you really can’t say anything about what sort of drag this hub will have….unless you modeled their exact design for the hub and ran simulations to get an estimate of drag. I don’t think you did the latter. And since the pawl design is way different than anything that’s ever been used before, you really can’t say anything about the drag at all.

Speshy
Speshy
1 month ago
Reply to  Robin

I think it’s pretty safe to assume this hub is going to super draggy. Sprag clutch is a superior design by far.

Robin
Robin
1 month ago
Reply to  Speshy

Based on what? “Superior” is not an objective measure of anything.

Geoff
Geoff
1 month ago
Reply to  Robin

Just modeled it up and all simulations say it’s super draggy.

Robin
Robin
1 month ago
Reply to  Geoff

It must be then.

seraph
1 month ago
Reply to  Robin

It’s simple physics that objects in contact with each other creates resistance, i.e. drag in this case. I don’t have to run tests to know that. I’ve seen enough pawl/ratchet/clutch designs in hubs to know that more contact equals more drag.

What you’re talking about is *relative* drag compared to other constant-contact pawl systems. What I’m talking about is more drag than a system like DT’s Star Ratchet (low tooth count) or Mavic’s ITS-4.

Robin
Robin
1 month ago
Reply to  seraph

Perhaps you should revisit the physics in terms of all the factors that influence drag in a hub. The number of POE is not the only factor. Look up “normal force” and then look up the equation for friction force and see how the normal force influences the friction force. It’s irrelevant what you’ve seen, especially since you haven’t seen this hub. After all, your opinion isn’t an objective measure of anything, and since such an appeal to authority is lame. Let us know when you test this hub. I hope you don’t design bikes and use “one-factor only” physics and engineering.

Oh, BTW: loads of people have claimed to have seen all sorts of things and then tried to use those claims as proof of something: Bigfoot believers, Flat Earthers, ghost hunters, etc.

FattyHugi
FattyHugi
1 month ago
Reply to  seraph

DT’s Star-Ratchet took Gold in last Olympics, so don’t think drag was a factor.

veloaficionado
veloaficionado
1 month ago
Reply to  FattyHugi

with discrete spring elements, and not every pawl edge exerting its own force.

seraph
1 month ago
Reply to  FattyHugi

I don’t think you read what I wrote. I said that DT was a low-drag system, especially with their low POE ratchets.

Deputy Dawg
Deputy Dawg
1 month ago

I might buy these just to never again have to worry about chasing tiny pawls and springs across the shop floor………..

veloaficionado
veloaficionado
1 month ago
Reply to  Deputy Dawg

just all the shards to sweep up when you pull an inevitably failed one apart.

Doc Sarvis
Doc Sarvis
1 month ago

They love flexures.

Tom Wenzel
1 month ago

Onyx rear hub has entered the chat…

Billyshoo
Billyshoo
1 month ago
Reply to  Tom Wenzel

Yes, very QUIETLY entered!

Engagement King
Engagement King
1 month ago

I can’t wait to pair this with my O-Chain device.

Last edited 1 month ago by Engagement King
BIG RING
BIG RING
1 month ago

Science: Everything is a spring. Luaf: No springs!

veloaficionado
veloaficionado
1 month ago

6 months later, you pull the hub apart, and hundreds of little pawl-shaped shards fall out, because the elasticity and shock-load resistance of the ‘pawls’ wasn’t subjected to real-world testing before being launched on the credulity of impressionable noob users. Why are you spending so many words on what is an obviously flawed engineering kite-fly?

Grillis
Grillis
1 month ago
Reply to  veloaficionado

You do realize that this is just a patent*, not a flushed out product, right?

Tom Wenzel
1 month ago

I am still puzzled by $himano’s inability to bring their Psylence rear hub to market a few years ago. I rode a bike outfitted with one and it was amazing. It apparently had longevity issues, but no doubt they could’ve worked them out.

Tim
Tim
1 month ago

Please, all you armchair engineers read this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Then look in a mirror to see a fine example.

Shafty
Shafty
1 month ago
Reply to  Tim

Did you learn the word fallacy today, too?

Most are skeptical of a design like this because the tolerances need to be very tight. Tight enough that I’m not sure it’s feasible, given the typical pricing of even premium hubs.The pawls would likely be EDM cut, and then ground. I’m not sure if powder metal pawls would work. These questions need to be asked: do we need this many points of engagement if it leads to reliability issues? Do we need more points of engagement than most can perceive? If this design relies on elasticity, and you can infer some change in engagement feel(slightly squishy), why is this a feature, when people levy the same as a complaint about Onyx hubs?

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.