When the Turner Burner and RockShox Pike were first introduced, mountain biking was very different than it is today. Hell, mountain biking now is radically different than it was just a few years ago, but in the case of the Turner Burner, full suspension bikes were similar to what fat bike full suspension bikes are today. At a time where hard tails were the norm, Dave Turner took a chance on a 2.75” travel full suspension frame that was raced under some of the nation’s top pros. From there the frame took off, eventually gaining the name Burner and an optional 3.6” travel “DH” rocker link for the big hit crowd.
Since then the Burner has been in and out of the lineup leading up to the version you see here today. For such a small company, Turner has always been willing to try out new technology, and for the rebirth of the Burner, Dave thought the 650b wheel would be a perfect fit. Smaller and lighter than comparable 29” wheels, 650b would retain the Burner’s playful past yet place it out front of the oncoming tidal wave of 27.5” bikes. Designed to be a “quiver killer,” the Burner had to do everything, and do everything well.
The original RockShox Pike has a similar story, produced in a time where longer travel trail or All Mountain bikes were just getting their legs. More than that, the Pike boasted versatility with a 20mm thru axle and a burly chassis that led to a number of more aggressive riders looking to put them on the front of their dirt jumpers and slopestyle bikes – even though that term hadn’t really been invented yet. Sure, the very first Pike had some teething problems, but it set a precedent as a light weight, capable, do-everything type of fork.
Now, the Pike has also been reintroduced in a 650b version (as well as 26” and 29”) at a perfect time to take advantage of the current Enduro trend. Even though Enduro wasn’t even a buzz word when it was first introduced, the Pike was bred for it then, and embodies the term more than ever now.
What are the Turner Burner and Pike like to live with for a season? Find out next…
There is a lot to be said about the Tuner Burner frame – 650b, made in the US aluminum, balanced DW link suspension, 44mm head tube, post mount disc brakes with replaceable threaded inserts, Zerk fittings for greasing the suspension pivots, custom external cable routing clamps, just about every inch of the bike has been carefully thought out in a way that makes the frame feel like an investment rather than the latest disposable bike. Obviously, that’s a big claim, but the Burner really does have a feel of quality and finish that is refreshing. The seat tube is perfectly honed, the post mounts for the brakes are properly faced as is the threaded bottom bracket, and touches like the Zerk fittings on all of the pivots show that future maintenance is a forethought, not an afterthought.
Could the Burner be made lighter and out of carbon? Looking at the Turner Czar that answer would be yes, but after riding and living with the Burner for a while I’m not sure I would want that. Just under 7 pounds for the frame (6.97 with axle to be exact), the Burner is on the heavy side for a 140mm travel bike but with an XT level 2x build and high end wheels, you’ll be in the neighborhood of 26-28 lbs which is plenty light for a 140/150mm travel bike with an aluminum frame. If anything, my time on the Burner has taught me that high end carbon wheels like ENVEs or Bontrager Rhythm Pro Carbons seem to make a bigger difference than a carbon frame – the ride quality is improved, the lighter weight makes the wheels quicker to accelerate, and the stiffness seems to help everywhere. However, during the review of the Burner both aluminum and carbon wheels were tested to make sure they didn’t skew the result. They didn’t. The Burner was still great.
For a bike with 140mm of rear travel, the Burner feels both XC efficient and Enduro ready all at once. If you ask Dave Turner, that’s exactly what he wanted out of the Burner – a bike that you could buy and ride just about everything. Based on my experience that’s pretty close to the truth – from gnarly DH runs and flow trails with high speed jumps to just recently putting it on the podium during an XC TT (and taking the only KOM on course). The Burner may be as close as you can get to a “jack of all trades” bike today. Our test bike included the standard Fox Float CTD rear shock that most of the time was left in the Trail position. The DW-Link suspension is extremely efficient, but the descend mode left the suspension a little too active for most riding. In this case I feel that the CTD Adjust shock would be a worthwhile upgrade so you could fine tune the trail setting, but as it was there were really no complaints out of the rear end. Personally, I also feel that the Burner climbs better when seated, but then I climb better when seated so it makes sense. On ripping down hills the DW Link kept the shock from wallowing in the travel and remained composed off jumps and through high speed rock gardens.
Sizing wise, the medium 17″ frame fit my 5’8″ needs perfectly. Often an issue on many of my test bikes, the short head tube allows for the handlebar to be properly low, while the seatube has enough room for me to install a longer dropper post. All of these issues are reasons why I think I will always gravitate to 27.5″ wheels when it comes to full suspension bikes, but the Turner fits among the best.
