Home > Other Fun Stuff > Advocacy & Industry News > News

Sour Steel Bikes Shifted to Almost-UDH Dropouts Saving Weight & Headaches

Sour Not-Quite-UDH for steel bikes, more universal compatibility, Purple Haze with GX transmission
13 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

UDH is the big bike buzzword these days – with SRAM’s latest direct-mount Transmission derailleurs requiring it – but Sour thinks they’ve found a better way to future-proof their steel bikes. Instead of fully adopting the universal hanger standard, Sour tweaked it a bit so they could still make a lightweight dropout well-suited for small-diameter steel tubes, but with T-type direct mount derailleur compatibility. And importantly for some adventure riders… Tailfin compatibility, too.

Sour goes Almost-UDH for Transmission compatibility

Sour Not-Quite-UDH for steel bikes, more universal compatibility, Purple Haze with mullet Eagle transmission
(Photos/Sour)

OK I know, I know…

We finally got a universal derailleur hanger standard that brands were whole-heartily adopting, and these steel bike builders decided to screw with it and make another standard!

What are they thinking?

Well…

What they are thinking is that UDH is really not quite as ‘universal’ as well all thought. And it was really optimized for the flat wide dropouts of carbon bikes.

2024 Sour Not-UDH almost universal derailleur hanger Transmission direct mount compatibility for steel bikes, inside detail

It requires a 13mm thick dropout with a pretty big 30x40mm flat area on the inside and 25mm diameter flat spot on the outside. Transmission derailleurs simply require ~30mm in diameter flat on both sides. That’s pretty standard on carbon bikes. And alloy bikes with big machined dropouts can also easily make that work.

But many quality steel and titanium bikes use much smaller (often hooded or flat plate dropouts), optimized to weld or braze-on small diameter seatstays & chainstays. And they simply don’t have enough free real estate to work with UDH.

Yes, it’s possible to make it work. Some steel bikemakers have switched to bigger or interchangeable dropouts, completely rearranged the layout of their stays to fit, or some have come up with a good UDH-ready compromise.

Sour’s solution was to tweak the standard, just a bit.

What’s that mean?

Sour Not-UDH almost universal derailleur hanger Transmission direct mount compatibility for steel bikes, comparison
Sour Not-UDH (before 12mm hex Tailfin compatibility) left vs. SRAM UDH right (Bikerumor composite)

That means, the Sour Not-UDH is pretty much the same as a regular UDH, just with a bit of that inward-facing plastic upper fin chopped off. Sour says it’s about 15% smaller overall. That lets them fit it into a compact hooded dropout, and doesn’t get in the way of their integral rack/fender mount.

And on the outside, there’s just an alloy spacer since steel dropouts aren’t 13mm thick. Because, steel is just stronger, so they don’t need to be so wide, and can save quite a bit of weight.

Sour Not-UDH almost universal derailleur hanger Transmission direct mount compatibility for steel bikes, renderings
early Sour R&D rendering showing their slimmer steel dropout (orange), their Not-UDH (red) & its spacer (gray)

Plus, unlike the SRAM UDH which is partly plastic, the Sour Not-UDH is entirely made of machined aluminum. So, the Sour one might even offer more precise shifts?

Of note: Sour’s Not-Quite-UDH is all aluminum – much like Robert Axle or Wheels Mfg‘s all-alloy UDH replacements. Sour’s also uses a standard M17x1 lefthand thread pitch to assemble the 2 hanger halves. A big driver of this was simplified manufacturing. But also, a lot of people (qualified bike shops included) have been breaking some of SRAM UDHs when installing them. A good portion of that might be because of the high UDH torque rating, the non-standard left-hand thread pitch between the bolt & hanger, and the fact that many (most?) torque wrenches weirdly enough don’t work or are inaccurate for reverse threads. That and the fact that they are about half plastic.

Sour NOT-UDH almost universal derailleur hanger Transmission direct mount compatibility for steel bikes, comparison
Sour Not-UDH left vs. SRAM UDH right (Bikerumor composite)

Some more bits of ‘universal’ hassles…

One is that the SRAM UDH hanger is a ‘standard’ and works with 12mm x 1.0 thread pitch thru-axles. But some OEMs use the UDH interface, but their own hangers have a different thru-axle pitch (since that’s not technically part of the agreed-upon ‘standard’). Why some would use a M12x1.75 axle inside a UDH is inexplicable to me, but it exists. Sour sticks with M12x1, like SRAM, and like all of SRAM’s Transmission derailleurs (which also curiously each have different assembly bolts, presumably because of slightly different hangers integrated into each T-type derailleur).

2024 Sour Not-UDH almost universal derailleur hanger Transmission direct mount compatibility for steel bikes, detail

The last bit is that SRAM’s standard UDH solution is not Tailfin-friendly, because they require special axles that extend through the hanger (or T-type derailleurs) to mount the unique bikepacking racks. Since Sour is popular among bikepackers and adventure cyclists, they reworked their axles to bolt together with a 12mm hex wrench as soon as they realized this issue. So, many of the photos I have to illustrate this show a 8mm hex interface, but they’re now building bikes with the 12mm (and a 8mm adapter) and will send the new bolt to everyone who needs it.

Sour Not-UDH almost universal derailleur hanger Transmission direct mount compatibility for steel bikes, in the workshop

In the end, the Sour ‘Almost-UDH’ is “100% Transmission compatible”, since SRAM direct mount derailleurs don’t make contact with the portion with the fin anyway.

Sour Not-Quite-UDH – Availability

Sour Not-Quite-UDH for steel bikes, more universal compatibility, Purple Haze frameset detail

All new made-in-Germany Sour frames welded since last fall feature the new Not-UDH dropout. Sour says the new dropout & hanger is also a bit lighter than their previous dropouts, even with the added compatibility.

But YES, you can just fit any SRAM T-type derailleur or any conventional derailleur to your new Sour bike. And even a Tailfin rack with their special M12x1 thru-axle. Plus, Sour will deliver all of their new steel bikes with an extra spare hanger, too. (And it sounds like you could use it as a replacement for your regular UDH-equipped bike if you damage a hanger there.)

Sour Not-UDH almost universal derailleur hanger Transmission direct mount compatibility for steel bikes, 2024 Past Party mountain bike hardtail frame

Pick a Sour steel gravel or hardtail mountain bike if you want wide mountain climbing Transmission gearing. Or, now that Red went Xplr 13-speed, you can get a tighter-spaced 1x race setup for a gravel or all-road Sour.

Sour.bike

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter
Peter
9 days ago

The great thing about UDH is not just the full mount option but customer service. You‘ll get a hanger in every shop. In my optinion this really is engineering for the sake of engineering. Who cares about 20g on a steel frame?

Rastavelo
Rastavelo
8 days ago
Reply to  Peter

The bottom of the article says: you can also use a regular UDH.

Dominic
Dominic
8 days ago
Reply to  Peter

How does “UDH” mean “customer service”?? There never has been anything remotely “Universal” about “UDH” and the above article points out several aspects of its non universality.

Bret
Bret
8 days ago
Reply to  Dominic

uh…

what are you talking about, at this point nearly every single bike mfg has adopted this. You walk into any bike shop worth its salt and they will have the universal derailleur hanger. I wouldn’t buy a bike without UDH at this point. It’s the universally accepted derailleur hanger.

Mike
Mike
7 days ago
Reply to  Dominic

If You read it again You will change Your mind. The main advantage of UDH for customers is to be able to easily find a replacement at any shop and the article above didn’t deny it in any way, quite the opposite!

…(unless You’re unlucky with one of those M12x1,75 thread axles, but then You can just change both the hanger and the axle to the standard ones, cause Your frame mount is universal)…

Here however, it shouldn’t be called ‘universal’, but only ‘T-Type compatible’. It still requires a hanger that is this-one-frame-specific – the manufacturer chose it’s own comfort over the comfort of their customer. In a few years, or when they bankrupt, good luck finding spare parts…

Marcellus | Bombtrack
Marcellus | Bombtrack
6 days ago
Reply to  Mike

You only need to shave off the fin, which should be doable for any home mechanic with a file. The option to mount a Tailfin axle is excellent. I could imagine that some owners of non-Sour UDH bikes might switch to the Sour not-UDH to be able to mount a Tailfin. Also Sour states that this system is T-Type compatible and makes clear that the dropout is not compatible with UDH hangers.

Mike
Mike
6 days ago

Tailfin offers frame-mount adapters and we can clearly see a threaded hole above the axle, so it’s not about compatibility. They just wanted to justify using their old dropout manufacturing methods instead of incorporating new ones. In the end the customers are the ones that suffer here cause instead of going for one universal standard (finally!) they again made their own one…

Marcellus | Bombtrack
Marcellus | Bombtrack
6 days ago
Reply to  Mike

Of course the threaded holes can be used to mount a Tailfin rack to those dropouts. I was speaking about the possibility to use a Tailfin axle with their dropout and that it might be appealing to non Sour owners (without additional mounting holes). Also someone owning a Sour frame might prefer to use those threads in the dropouts for fenders, who knows. It is always nice to have options. If you prefer to use the standard UDH hanger its fine with me, I am not trying to talk you into buying a Sour frame. But in my opinion, the way Sour designed their dropout has no significant disadvantages for their customers, and they also explain their design choices very clear. Their design is T-Type compatible, allows symmetric seat stays, leaves enough space for welding, allows different seat stay angles, can be investment casted and is reasonable small. Needing to shave of the fin or buying a second replacement hanger from Sour is a small disadvantage in my eyes, but of course it is up to the customer to decide which solution they prefer. There are enough other makers who offer frames with UDH hangers, if this feature is at the top of your priority list.
I am not sure what you mean with “justify using their old dropout manufacturing method”. If you mean that they want to re-use their older dropout casting tooling, I think you are wrong. The T-Type compatible newer dropout looks significant different from the older dropout and I don’t think it is possible to modify the older tooling in such a way. However I don’t have any insight in the Sour product development, so I can only guess.

Mike
Mike
4 days ago

“If you mean that they want to re-use their older dropout casting tooling, I think you are wrong.” – but that’s exactly what they did. Otherwise, why would they not just go for the oversized dropout like some other manufacturers did? It’s even there in the article.

We all complained about many different standards for bike parts over the years. But now when one is becoming dominant, we see someone venture away from it and think “This is fine…”? Universal standards should not require doing bodges (like filing a piece of a der. hanger) to work just because one manufacturer didn’t wanna fully commit into it.

nooner
nooner
6 days ago

What if you want to run Shimano? Frames look nice BTW.

Scott
Scott
6 days ago
Reply to  nooner

You still can. Just use the UDH as normal.

seraph
seraph
6 days ago

Sorry but any shop that breaks a UDH during install shouldn’t be allowed to work on bikes anymore. They only have a 25nm reverse thread torque rating. I’ve installed hundreds without a single issue.

joe
joe
3 days ago

That’s a big nope from me.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.