Home > Bike Components > Drivetrain

Spotted: Blackwater and Marginal Gain Rethink the 1x Drivetrain

Orient Chainring
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Blackwater Bicycles showed something pretty different at the CRAFTED Bike Show at Cane Creek. We saw it online, and now we’re wishing we’d seen it in person.

Built in collaboration with Marginal Gain of Colorado, the bike uses a drivetrain concept called Orient. The new chainring has one simple goal: keep the chain straighter across more of the cassette.

What’s the bit that everyone’s trying to improve for 1x? Chainline, and no matter how close you get it, there’s always a compromise. Wide-range 1x drivetrains ask the chain to run at some pretty ugly angles in the biggest and smallest cogs. A gnarler angle means more friction, more wear, and less efficiency. But, maybe not for long.

Orient Chainring
(Photo/Blackwater Bikes)

Orient Chainline

Blackwater and Marginal Gain built the drivetrain around a different layout meant to reduce chain articulation across the range. The idea gets more interesting as cassette counts keep climbing. Marginal Gain says the concept could support 15- or even 16-speed setups while still keeping chain angles more reasonable than many current 1x systems.

The setup was on a Blackwater Splitfire at CRAFTED. Where small builders and component makers had plenty of room to bring out the weird (and ultra practical) stuff.

marginalgains chainring 1X production
(Image/Marginalgains chainring 1X production video from Instagram)

Most drivetrain development is focused on adding another cog or making the derailleur smarter. Blackwater and Marginal Gain are looking at the problem from a different angl. Asking whether the chainline itself is what needs to change – Mind blown!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Astro_Kraken
Astro_Kraken
5 hours ago

I get it but I’m still unsettled.

Billyshoo
Billyshoo
5 hours ago

Super cool! I love innovation. Obviously additional weight is one consideration. Another concern – for off-road environments – is all that extra surface area to collect mud: two additional rings and one of them sitting kiddywampus smack dab in the middle to catch lots of slop.

Big C
Big C
4 hours ago

What if they made one of the chainrings a bit smaller than the other and, in turn, increased the number of gear ratios. Now that would be a serious innovation!

Big C
Big C
3 hours ago

Heck no! Front derailleurs add complexity and this is such a simple solution 😉

In all seriousness…There is something very satisfying about the design. I’m curious about what happens on the cogs that are next to the shift points: Could you shift by accident when under power? Is there more wear at these points? Could frame dynamics affect shift points (i.e. installing this on a Slingshot retro build)? At the very least, they should turn this into a screen saver.

Jeff L
Jeff L
4 hours ago

All of this because Sram could not get a front derailleur working. Also there is still a lot of cross chaining when going from small cog to big cog. If the front ring was just placed in the middle of the cassette the chain would only move laterally for 1/2 the thickness of the cassette. This solution is worse than that. And heavier and likely way more $$$

David
David
1 hour ago
Reply to  Jeff L

Agreed. I would love to go back to 2×10 Shimano without a clutch! Actually, probably my favourite drivetrain other than 1×11 XTR M9000 was Deore 3×9!

Ululu
Ululu
3 hours ago

Pretty cool solution which doesn’t involve a motor to move the chainring but I doubt cross-chaining losses are serious enough with current 1×12/13 drivetrains to make this worthwhile.
All in all on average the chain line doesn’t look all that much better and the you now have the most severe cross-chaining in the middle of the cassette where the chain spends the most time.
Maybe the chainrings should be closer together which would also aid for tire clearance.

Joenomad
Joenomad
2 hours ago

I saw it at the show and still appeared to be in the design phase and looking for an investor. Electronic shifting has solved some of the need to think about shifting between the large and small chainring and maximizing cadence and other variables.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.