Home > Bike Types > Road Bike

Forget the UCI: Trek Adds Ultra Light Madone Gen 8 with UCI-Illegal SRAM 1x Build

Trek Madone Gen 8 lightest build UCI illegal
18 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

For years now, the UCI has set the minimum weight limit for pro road bikes used in sanctioned events at 6.8kg or 14.99lbs. Their reasoning? At the time the rule was introduced, there was concern that building a race bike lighter than that arbitrary weight limit would render it potentially unsafe for competition. Since then, there has been talk about updating the rule, but for now, pros cannot enter a race with a bike under 6.8kg.

But you’re not a pro. And if you’re not riding in a UCI-sanctioned event, you can build a bike under the UCI weight limit – or just buy one off the shelf, like the newest Trek Madone build.

The latest Trek Madone Gen 8 configuration with their 900 series OCLV carbon claims to weigh less than the UCI minimum, even with bottle cages, pedals, and a computer mount.

To get there, this is the first time that Trek has offered a SRAM 1x build on the Madone platform, with options of an ultralight 1×12 SRAM RED AXS drivetrain, or the 1×13 XPLR drivetrain (the 1×12 option is the lighter of the two).

Lighter Aeolus RSL 37 carbon wheels are wrapped with Pirelli P-Zero RS tires and Pirelli SmartTube TPU tubes to shave weight, and the bike can be finished in the optional Matte Deep Smoke colorway for an even lighter build.

The complete build is said to weigh in at 6.4kg (14.11lbs) for a ML, and pricing starts at $12,999.99. For comparison, the same bike with a 2×12 drivetrain and deeper wheels weighs in at 7kg (15.44lbs), and pricing starts about $500 higher.

Available now at select Trek retailers and online at Trekbikes.com, you can also customize your ride on Trek’s ProjectOne configurator.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eggs Benedict
Eggs Benedict
1 month ago

They should raise the minimum weight limit to 17 pounds, no ballast allowed.

Dockboy
Dockboy
1 month ago
Reply to  Eggs Benedict

I have a few why questions for you:
Why have a weight limit at all?
Why raise it when bikes can be safely built lighter and lighter?
Why prohibit ballast?
Why 17 pounds?

Shafty
Shafty
1 month ago
Reply to  Dockboy

You would prohibit ballast for the same reason fairings aren’t allowed–non-structural elements are banned. I’m in favor of this. Why have a weight limit “for safety”, if it doesn’t force the manufactures to make a bike the UCI deems safe?

Having a weight limit equalizes the playing field *to some degree*, by reducing necessary budgets for teams.

Can *every* rider build a bike their size under the weight limit with publicly available parts? Not sure I agree with 17lbs, but there has to be a limit somewhere, otherwise the most well-funded teams have a distinct advantage.

Nate
Nate
1 month ago

Super shallow wheels and a massive 1x chainring with a road cassette is oxymoronic. It’s not the right gearing for climbing but it’s too shallow to really capitalize on flat road riding. Huge swing and a miss for a whopping $13000

Prrrrrrer
Prrrrrrer
1 month ago
Reply to  Nate

I respectfully disagree. I live in Ouray Colorado with a very similar 1x setup. It takes a minute to get used to, and I had to start by lifting weights, but this is a very climbable configuration. Further, I’m not sure that shallow wheels are that big of a limiter for anybody not racing at the pro tour level. You’d be better off restricting calories or just taking second place than complaining that you lost or on fast enough because of the depth of your wheels.

Nate
Nate
1 month ago
Reply to  Prrrrrrer

The average person buying this Madone is not climbing anywhere near as comfortably as you think on a 48t 10-36t. I truly wonder how disillusioned you can be to be to say “oh yeah no it’s totally fine bro, you just have to power lift and get used to a cadence of 10rpm”.

For the record I have 5 bikes with 1x chainrings including a 48t 10-28t and a 52t 10-26t.

Ululu
Ululu
1 month ago
Reply to  Nate

Riders (even racers) choosing irrationally big chainrings for their ego is still a very common thing. On the flats you’ll find no opportunity to use those monster gears, on hilly terrain you can use them to waste energy pedalling downhill you’d better save to be able to grind your unneccessarily big lowest gear uphill.

Makes only sense if you deliberately don’t want to use your small/big gears to keep cross-chaining down like the pros do when TTing but that’s hunting for marginal gains.

SRAM’s 10-36 cassette offers terrible gear spacing (big jumps in the middle, small jumps in the climbing gears). It doesn’t offer any benefit w.r.t jumps over the 13sp XPLR cassette which also comes with a 13-15 jump.

So for 1x I’d rather pick the 10-33 one or the 13sp 10-46. Ideally they’d make a tighter 13 speed one. Maybe 11-46 if there’s no spoke clearance for a smaller largest cog.

Shane
Shane
1 month ago
Reply to  Nate

MN rider here. 50t x 11-34 is my only combo. Very rarely do I need lower.

Prrrrrrer
Prrrrrrer
1 month ago
Reply to  Nate

Far out. But, it wasn’t long ago a 50 tooth was considered part of a compact crank set. Granted, it was a 2x. My solution: gain 50 grams with a new cassette? Or maybe stay off those damn Culvers cheese curds and IPAs.

That said, when I told my wife you implied I was a ‘power lifter’…. Yeah, she laughed. Hard. Then she called me ‘bro’ and told me I looked tired. Alas.

seraph
seraph
1 month ago
Reply to  Nate

Nothing about those wheels is “super shallow”. The rims on my gravel bike are only 25mm deep.

Nate
Nate
1 month ago
Reply to  seraph

It’s an aero bike, if it’s not 50mm or greater then it’s counter-intuitive but Trek just wants their weight weenie marketing talk track. Plus aero bikes with shallow wheels look like deer on stilts.

Oli
Oli
1 month ago

Gotta clear out inventory. Gen9 is already ready.

Robert
Robert
1 month ago

$13K?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!

syborg
syborg
1 month ago

Treks ignoring the arbitrary UCI weight limit almost offsets their virtue signaling lower impact aluminum.

Tim
Tim
1 month ago

I dont think this is that difficult of a weight target paying 13k is insane. I built a 15 pound bike for less than a thousand bucks from Facebook marketplace parts, and it’s a 2x. Austro Daimler superleicht carbon frame, sram red shifting, campi carbon crank, carbon bar, it doesn’t even have carbon wheels, just rigida rims and miche hubs. I know I could hit 14 if I shelled out for some carbon wheels, and it’s not the most aero, but it’s a joy to ride.

Kwas
Kwas
1 month ago

To have a bike with the ride quality, aero and disc brakes under the weight limit is actually pretty impressive. I bet it rides really well, which would be the difference. Yes you can build a light bike, but how does it feel?
. Trek made a 10lb. Emonda over 10 years ago. You could deform the frame with your finger. My ancient and xxl cannondale System Six weighs 14.2 with pedals and bottle cages and has an Aluminum rear end. It only has an Ultegra 11 speed build. Super light wheels. That bike was famously the stiffest and lightest in the peloton at the time. It rides like it, I love the speed, but I haven’t touched it this year since getting a new bike. The 1x is interesting. I don’t understand why it is not allowed since riders are using it in the pro peloton now. Wasn’t there a whole team on FSA 1x, disastrously? I run a 48x 10-52 on my new bike. I like it except for the racket in the back going up long steep climbs. If I were racing, I would run 2x.
I think the shallow wheels speak to the climb ability of this bike, and I think that is the intention. I remember first seeing these being ridden on mtn stages and thinking it was a good call. I agree, it seems like they could have made that point with 40mm rims…
Such a nice bike, but I am more of a boutique buyer, especially at that price…

Simon
Simon
1 month ago
Reply to  Kwas

If they really cared about wheel weight they’d dump those ridiculous tlr rimserts and save 150g by just taping the rims

Sajuuk
Sajuuk
1 month ago
Reply to  Kwas

Was SRAM, not FSA. You’re thinking of Aqua Blue Sport, the team with SRAM Red 1x and 3T bikes.

FSA’s 2x semi-wireless gruppo is only on a handful of teams that I know of, including Burgos-BH… and no 1x gruppo that I know of.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.