Home > Other Fun Stuff > Advocacy & Industry News > News

UCI Gearing Rule Change Could Ground SRAM’s 10‑Tooth Cogs

2019 SRAM Red eTap 12-speed 2x12 wireless road bike groupset prototype
13 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

The UCI is on a bubble-bursting equipment crackdown this month, first, with the newly updated handlebar width rule (rolling into effect January 1, 2026). Now, an updated gearing change rule could render SRAM’s unique and groundbreaking 10-tooth road cog obsolete. It’s packing significant implications for both SRAM and its sponsored teams.

new sram red axs cassette options shown lined up.
Photo: SRAM

When does it go into effect? This rule could go into effect as early as August this year. The UCI states: “The events during which the tests will be carried out will be announced at a later date.” We’re guessing that stage or race won’t end in a downhill sprint finish, or will it?

closeup look at prototype sram eagle sl cassette
Photo: Cory Benson

What’s the New UCI Gearing Rule?

The gearing limitations begin with a trial phase, during which the governing body will test a maximum gear ratio of 54×11, capped at 10.46 meters of development per crank revolution.

Who will these setups affect? Mostly just the SRAM teams and riders. By contrast, Shimano and Campagnolo—whose 12- or 13-speed cassettes start at 11T—could avoid the problem altogether.

That means a drawback for SRAM-sponsored riders not just in sprint speed but potentially in mechanical parity. SRAM’s 10T cog—or those monster 62T chainrings—are going to be on the chopping block.

Q365_Team camp Scott Foil SRAM

SRAM’s Options—or Lack Thereof

SRAM’s in a bind. To comply, its mechanics will have to physically lock out the 10T cog, or SRAM could pivot to making 11T cassettes or a 49T chainring. This tweak would help limit the gearing and bring them into UCI compliance (around 131 gear inches with a 28mm tire), but it’s not an easy fix. Without that, top-end setups (think 1x with wide-range cassettes, as we saw at the Classics) will be verboten.

We’ll know more soon, hopefully, but as of right now, there is no official word from the SRAM crew.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eggs Benedict
Eggs Benedict
1 day ago

Good.

Whodee
Whodee
1 day ago

So weird that the UCI is making a new rule that really only affects a single company. Their equipment rule updates usually seem to be extremely well thought out to prevent things like this. >headdesk.gif<

raul d
raul d
1 day ago

Who is the UCI working for? The pros or recreational riders? As a recreational rider I can live w/o 10t or even 11t cogs. I bought my first SRAM AXS drivetrain bike a couple years ago and wish I had gone Shimano because it’s my feeling the bigger cog/chainring combos are smoother. Dropping the 10t could even things up between the brands.

seraph
seraph
1 day ago

Ban the UCI.

Marcel
Marcel
1 day ago

Oh no, they need to invent a 11T cassette now. Impossible!!

Jeb
Jeb
1 day ago

The funny thing about this is big front chainrings came about when SRAM sponsored teams were complaining that the 10t was inefficient. This doesn’t matter (AT ALL) for the average punter but for a WT pro with a NP of 400 watts on a 5 hour flat tour stage, sitting camped in the 10t is not ideal. SRAM developed pro only 54 tooth rings and I believe some teams locked out the 10t at times.

Exodux
Exodux
1 day ago

The UCI is bordering on stupidity. Sure some things that are unsafe or unfair needs rule changes, but these new rules don’t do any of that, with the exception of bar width, which still isn’t a problem yet. It seems the UCI is trying to stay relevant.
I’m just trying to get my head around how a 10t cog is a safety issue or unfair advantage.

Jon
Jon
1 day ago

It sounds like UCI wants to limit the largest gear ratio to the equivalent of 54T front 11T rear. SRAM could keep the 10T but would have to lower the front ring to 49T (or likely 48T for NW design). They could also lock out the 10T and effectively run an 11spd setup with an 11T.

Mr. P
Mr. P
1 day ago

Is the UCI looking to limit top speed on descents? That is the only way I see using a 10t with a pro-sized chainring.

Ululu
Ululu
19 hours ago
Reply to  Mr. P

They are but I don’t think it will have the desired effect in its entirety. Sure, the average speed on downhill sections will be lower but this won’t make riders go slower where it matters most (around corners) or brake earlier.

DaveJ
DaveJ
1 day ago

FWIW a 53/11 cap keeps everything fair across brands. I wonder what’s going in in the background.

raul d
raul d
11 hours ago

I gotta idea, if the UCI wants to slow down races they could limit tire widths to 25mm.

Eggs Benedict
Eggs Benedict
7 hours ago
Reply to  raul d

I like your comment. But that would require higher tire pressures and hooked rims. And the manufacturers wouldn’t like that, it would contradict the narrative they are presenting. The goal is change, so everyone has to buy new stuff. But you can’t say it like that.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.