Home > Other Fun Stuff > Advocacy & Industry News > News

UCI Gearing Rule Change Could Ground SRAM’s 10‑Tooth Cogs

2019 SRAM Red eTap 12-speed 2x12 wireless road bike groupset prototype
19 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

The UCI is on a bubble-bursting equipment crackdown this month, first, with the newly updated handlebar width rule (rolling into effect January 1, 2026). Now, an updated gearing change rule could render SRAM’s unique and groundbreaking 10-tooth road cog obsolete. It’s packing significant implications for both SRAM and its sponsored teams.

new sram red axs cassette options shown lined up.
Photo: SRAM

When does it go into effect? This rule could go into effect as early as August this year. The UCI states: “The events during which the tests will be carried out will be announced at a later date.” We’re guessing that stage or race won’t end in a downhill sprint finish, or will it?

closeup look at prototype sram eagle sl cassette
Photo: Cory Benson

What’s the New UCI Gearing Rule?

The gearing limitations begin with a trial phase, during which the governing body will test a maximum gear ratio of 54×11, capped at 10.46 meters of development per crank revolution.

Who will these setups affect? Mostly just the SRAM teams and riders. By contrast, Shimano and Campagnolo—whose 12- or 13-speed cassettes start at 11T—could avoid the problem altogether.

That means a drawback for SRAM-sponsored riders not just in sprint speed but potentially in mechanical parity. SRAM’s 10T cog—or those monster 62T chainrings—are going to be on the chopping block.

Q365_Team camp Scott Foil SRAM

SRAM’s Options—or Lack Thereof

SRAM’s in a bind. To comply, its mechanics will have to physically lock out the 10T cog, or SRAM could pivot to making 11T cassettes or a 49T chainring. This tweak would help limit the gearing and bring them into UCI compliance (around 131 gear inches with a 28mm tire), but it’s not an easy fix. Without that, top-end setups (think 1x with wide-range cassettes, as we saw at the Classics) will be verboten.

We’ll know more soon, hopefully, but as of right now, there is no official word from the SRAM crew.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eggs Benedict
Eggs Benedict
4 days ago

Good.

Whodee
Whodee
4 days ago

So weird that the UCI is making a new rule that really only affects a single company. Their equipment rule updates usually seem to be extremely well thought out to prevent things like this. >headdesk.gif<

raul d
raul d
4 days ago

Who is the UCI working for? The pros or recreational riders? As a recreational rider I can live w/o 10t or even 11t cogs. I bought my first SRAM AXS drivetrain bike a couple years ago and wish I had gone Shimano because it’s my feeling the bigger cog/chainring combos are smoother. Dropping the 10t could even things up between the brands.

seraph
seraph
4 days ago

Ban the UCI.

Marcel
Marcel
4 days ago

Oh no, they need to invent a 11T cassette now. Impossible!!

Jeb
Jeb
4 days ago

The funny thing about this is big front chainrings came about when SRAM sponsored teams were complaining that the 10t was inefficient. This doesn’t matter (AT ALL) for the average punter but for a WT pro with a NP of 400 watts on a 5 hour flat tour stage, sitting camped in the 10t is not ideal. SRAM developed pro only 54 tooth rings and I believe some teams locked out the 10t at times.

Exodux
4 days ago

The UCI is bordering on stupidity. Sure some things that are unsafe or unfair needs rule changes, but these new rules don’t do any of that, with the exception of bar width, which still isn’t a problem yet. It seems the UCI is trying to stay relevant.
I’m just trying to get my head around how a 10t cog is a safety issue or unfair advantage.

Jon
Jon
4 days ago

It sounds like UCI wants to limit the largest gear ratio to the equivalent of 54T front 11T rear. SRAM could keep the 10T but would have to lower the front ring to 49T (or likely 48T for NW design). They could also lock out the 10T and effectively run an 11spd setup with an 11T.

Mr. P
Mr. P
4 days ago

Is the UCI looking to limit top speed on descents? That is the only way I see using a 10t with a pro-sized chainring.

Ululu
Ululu
3 days ago
Reply to  Mr. P

They are but I don’t think it will have the desired effect in its entirety. Sure, the average speed on downhill sections will be lower but this won’t make riders go slower where it matters most (around corners) or brake earlier.

DaveJ
DaveJ
4 days ago

FWIW a 53/11 cap keeps everything fair across brands. I wonder what’s going in in the background.

Nick
Nick
1 day ago
Reply to  DaveJ

Across brands? Right now you are free to run seemingly any chainring you want, why does the cassette matter at all? Limiting the gearing, like in Jr racing, allows for closer racing. In a Jr application, it’s needed because of maturity level not being equal in children of the same age. In professional racing, this will only cause more pile ups, and danger in the descents. It’s silly, and poorly thought out at best. It’s only punishing a company that decided, for better or worse(mostly worse) that they would use a 10t cog. Why not cap cassettes at 10 speed, 13-25? Or tires at 21c, or go back to steel frames. It’s all just kind of dumb.

Last edited 1 day ago by Nick
raul d
raul d
3 days ago

I gotta idea, if the UCI wants to slow down races they could limit tire widths to 25mm.

Eggs Benedict
Eggs Benedict
3 days ago
Reply to  raul d

I like your comment. But that would require higher tire pressures and hooked rims. And the manufacturers wouldn’t like that, it would contradict the narrative they are presenting. The goal is change, so everyone has to buy new stuff. But you can’t say it like that.

David Croxton
David Croxton
1 day ago

“True” gearing is pedal spindle distance in a circle over distance travelled.
Shorter cranks make gearing taller

Ed LLorca
Ed LLorca
1 day ago

What’s the big deal? SRAM can make a 11-whatever in a split second if they want. The can run 2x as well. This is much ado about nothing.

Jeff S
Jeff S
1 day ago

Gear blocking (via derailleur limit screw) was never legal for juniors at UCI events when they had gear restrictions, so I would doubt they would allow it here.

Dan
Dan
1 day ago

If SRAM listens to the Pro Teams they sponsor, most mechanics and riders would gladly give up the 10t cog and keep the 54t big rings. Personally, I’d love an 11-36 cassette. Take that 10t off and give me the 14t back.

Denys
Denys
21 hours ago

We are one step away from just setting a speed limit and disqualifying for exceeding it, this is ridiculous

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.