Yes, there’s a little tongue in cheek with our title because in a few years our bet is disc brakes in the pro peloton of all disciplines will be the obvious spec we all really know it’s going to be. Just like e-bikes are coming whether you like them or not. So we love seeing some of the biggest and best keepin’ it real. Thanks for posting, JPow!
Cue people who understand neither physics nor cycling trying to bring the “inertia” of a spinning wheel into this. To those people: First look up what inertia actually means, then look at some race crashes, think for a while, and then go ahead and conclude inertia has nothing to do with this.
Maybe pedantic, but aren’t you implying inertia has a lot to do with this, just that the rotational inertia of a road wheel in a crash is too low to result in an issue (further…most crashes will have a rider lock up wheels first, or the wheels stop moving due to the crash, so rotational speed will be low and due to the bike falling/getting hit by other objects)
It’s not clear what you mean by inertia. Are you talking about the wheel’s moment of inertia or the angular momentum of the wheel? No matter the case both are factors in how much force (and thus torque) has to be applied to slow the wheel to a stop in a specified interval of time and in any description of the wheel’s behavior over time.
Do you have physics that indicates otherwise? I’m interested in reading how you’ve proven Newton Mechanics false on the macro level.
With that said, the one thing this sort of test doesn’t show is what happens if the body part experiences a big impulse when it strikes a disc. That’s a not a comment against discs. Hell, I think discs are great and won’t cause the horrifying calamity that so many seem to envision, but in the spirit of good testing and experimentation, we have to analyze the limits of any given test or experiment.
I typed an elaborate comment, but it seems to have been withheld. Too bad. Anyway, the gist is this: We totally agree, but you didn’t read my comment correctly. I was specifically talking about comparing the controlled experiment in the video to an actual crash, not about the mechanics of the controlled experiment itself. Which is also what you did in your last paragraph, so we agree.
The same has already been tried by a lot of people using non-rounded rotors. Just Google and you’ll find several videos. The result is always basically the same. Click my name to see my – unsuccessful – attempt to cut myself with 2015 Ice Tech rotors (non-rounded). That being said: Rounded rotors are obviously big progress, without any down sides.
Pretty much true, except a good percentage of riders don’t have climbs around that are more than a mile. Plus, I’ve never heard someone with years of racing skills say “yeah, I would’ve won, if only my brakes were better.” Good racers, whether alone or in a race, aren’t braking all that hard, all that often. Mountain biking and road biking do not have the same braking requirements, although they do benefit some riders greatly. Can’t it be possible that for some of us, the pros don’t outweigh the cons?
Sure they do, considering the bikes have a minimum weight limit of 6.5kg which brands are having such a hard time reaching at the moment… Disc brakes are WAY better than rim brakes and only conservative roadies who are afraid of change would be against them! Roadies today sound like mtbikers from the 90s who swore v-brakes were better and guess what? Today every bike has disc brakes!
You know what adds 2.7mins up Alpe D’Huez? Not using EPO and being clean!
While I agree with your statement, I am compelled to correct your “since the 80’s” statement. There were extremely few models available even in the late 80’s.
In fact, most of the brakes on MTB back then were simple cantilever brakes since V-Brakes didn’t take hold until the early 90’s.
Disc brakes on MTB’s didn’t see widespread use until the mid to late 90’s.
Formula did make a disc brake as early as 1987 (according to PinkBike), but it took more than a few years for everyone to catch up with you- it was fully another ten years before the first widespread mounting standard for frames came along, the Hayes 22mm mount, which in any case was later phased out. Into the early 2000s, rim brakes remained common on high-end race bikes. You definitely were way, way ahead of the times running discs in the late 80s.
@Jesse, don’t buy SRAM and you’ll have none of those issues. My Shimano discs are absolutely silent and do not rub if set up correctly. Most importantly, the have far better modulation than rim brakes and do not wear my rims.
I’m not a racer but I do ride my bikes hard and ride through town to get to the wide open roads in my area.
We’ve had the new rounded rotors available the shop since January. Unscientific but pretty convincing tests abound, the most hilarious being the mechanics dropped a spinning rear wheel bike and all rotor first on to an exposed thigh. Had a red mark for a couple days, no broken skin. Don’t tell OSHA.
When in a road bike pile up crash does a bike stay upright with a rider while somebody is against their wheel? It doesn’t happen. I’d you’re touching a disc brake bikes are flying or on the ground already.
Hell, I’d take the disc brake over my hand in the bladed spokes all day every day.
I give him 3000 euros if he does the same thing after a 10km downhill, when the rotors are over 100 degrees.
After a descent, I though my rotor was loose, stupid of me, I touched it with my fingers to check it, burned both fingerprints. Fingerprints fully erased in 3 seconds.
fake news, sram sponsored.
Pretty sure he’s talking celcius.
That said, it’s not really much worse than rim brakes – rim brakes dissipate heat faster but its not instant either and both will burn you for sure – (still better than chopping a finger, though i’m more scared of pedals, spokes, chain rings and handle bars personally speaking…
honestly though, a paid spokesperson telling you something is safe isn’t exactly objective, unbiased reporting. the test would be much more accurate if he heated the rotor up first, then slammed his shin or forearm into it at 40 mph. something tells me the result would be a little different.
disc brakes? whatever, it’s a brake. if you’re really fighting to help out manufacturers, good for you, but my fat butt can lock up a rear wheel just as fast with a caliper brake. they are also lightweight, super easy to adjust while riding, and make wheel changes easy. i really can’t see what the fuss is about beyond just selling more stuff to roadies, which is already like shooting fish in a barrel.
Stop being dumb, people. That’s not the sharp part of the rotor.