With the Tour de France – the big show for road bike debuts – just days a way, Cannondale has a disc brake-only carbon road bike to reveal – the all-new 2019 Cannondale SystemSix. We got a close-up look at the bike and its unique tech, plus some first rides. Cannondale are hesitant to call it an aero road bike, but it is aero claiming to be faster everywhere…

2019 Cannondale SystemSix carbon disc brake aero road

With what Cannondale says is “the least drag of any UCI-legal road bike on the market” they are claiming this is the “Fastest Road Bike in the World”. Cannondale has been oddly late to the aero road bike category, with their pro team riders for the most part racing on the all-around, lightweight SuperSix Evo. Well, except ever since last year’s Giro were we already saw what turns out to be final preproduction versions of this bike, wrapped in all-black decals.

Aero Bike Development Story

But Cannondale’s designers & engineers had been toiling away, in CFD & the wind tunnel, but also in data analysis to see when to swap over to the aero optimized bike. In a word, it’s anything below 6% average climbing where aero trumps weight, which means we should expect to see Education First – Drapac racing the SystemSix even in quite a lot of hilly stages as well. Basically from 15km/h and up aero drag provides more resistance that all others put together on a flat road. Beyond 6% climbs, the 1kg you can save going to a climbing bike saves energy, but that only really works for a mountain top finish, because this thing descends faster too. But don’t call it an aero bike…

Taking their Si systems integration approach to all-out road racing, the new SystemSix is more than just an aero road frame designed to cheat the wind.

Cannondale brought a new aero specialist onto their team to design the new road bike, but the first thing they really did was break down the six total forces resisting your bike going forward. Rolling resistance, to wheel bearing friction, drivetrain friction, potential energy (elevation), kinetic energy (acceleration), and finishing with aerodynamic drag.

They took an analytical approach to try to create a faster all around bike, ultimately coming up with an integrated solution of six components: frame, fork, wheels, seatpost, bar, and stem. Those all get KNØT naming in reference to wind speed measurements.

One of the biggest gains on an aero road bike inevitably comes down to the wheels. So Cannondale set out from the start to develop something unique here too, coming up with the unconventionally wide Knot 64s.

Aero Optimization & Yaw Weighted Drag

Everything deigned to work together to go faster, part of that was developing a way to quantify aero performance. Cannondale settled on what they are calling Yaw Weighted Drag which basically takes a huge amount of public yaw angle wind data, and plots its probability against a bell curve to establish the importance of performance at each angle. It is a simplification, and of course some people will ride in areas with differing wind conditions, but ultimately made it easier to visualize the faster performance Cannondale was aiming for as an all around race bike.

Breaking that down they claim the new SystemSix outperforms every other aero road bike on the market, saving from 6W vs. a trek Madone, up to 23W vs. a Scott Foil, even 50W compared to a typical lightweight-focused bike.

If you want to look at some of that aero performance of the SystemSix, Cannondale has also added similar Augmented Reality functionality with the View app like they did on the recent F-Si & Lefty Ocho introduction.

“SystemSix is the result of a ground up design where each element is optimized in pursuit of speed,” says Nathan Barry, Cannondale’s aero-specializing Design Engineer. “Aerodynamic drag is the single greatest resistive force that riders have to overcome so it is important to everyone, not just racers. SystemSix delivers more speed, to more riders, more of the time.”

Frame & Fork Tech Details

Besides building an overall faster, more aero road bike the SystemSix gets down into the details. One of the big things is wider tire clearance not just for the 26mm rubber spec’ed on the complete bikes, but up to 30mm tires with plenty of space around for even the roughest road surfaces.

The frame gets tailored, truncated airfoil profiles that factor in air transiting from the part of the frame ahead of it, but also to how moving parts like wheels and the rider affect it as well. That means it isn’t all Kamm tails or pure aerofoils, but a wide range of shaping throughout.

One of the most noticeable design is the fins (called a chine) to control airflow off the fork to the frame smoothly. Oh, and the lack of cables, with an easy-to-service internal cable routing that puts hydraulic lines and Di2 wires entirely inside via a chamber open at the front of the headtube.

An interchangeable Switchplate on the top of the downtube lets the bike get an easy-to-reach Di2 control box, or it can serve for mechanical shift routing (that doesn’t readily work in the aero fully internal routing solution.)

Like we saw back at the Giro, the bike gets standard bottle bosses, plus a lower more aero position if you are only going to run a single bottle.

We also noticed on the pro bikes, the use of Speed Release open dropouts for faster race wheel changes. The wheels use standard 12mm thru-axles, but a 10mm slot on the axle drops out of the same sized slots on the frames, so the axles don’t need to be fully removed. Double leads on the threads also mean a faster first engagement when threading the wheel back in.

All that and the frame promises pro race drivetrain stiffness in hi-mod or standard carbon construction, backed by thin enough seat and especially chainstays to allow vertical deflection to prevent harsh riding.

The new SystemSix frame claims a weight of 981g for the bare medium frame, plus 65g for all the small hardware parts, and another ~70g in paint. (The smallest is 87g lighter, the largest 104g more.) That means the actual frame weighs about 1116g in a 56cm.

The fork itself of course gets asymmetric legs, to solve its disc only use. It continues the stealthy internal routing, and builds in the 50° steering stop that allowed Cannondale to put Di2 wires and hydraulic lines inside without overly complicated solutions.

Knot64 wide aero carbon wheels

One of the biggest gains on an aero road bike inevitably comes down to the wheels. So Cannondale went all in developing a wheelset optimized for aero performance with a wide tire comfort and rolling resistance benefits.

The unique wheels get a wide for road racing 21mm internal rim bed designed to turn a 23c tire into a real 26mm wide profile overall. That’s where the aerodynamics are actually the best, with a rim that is actually 32mm wide at its biggest point, and 64mm deep.

Developed to present an ideal aerofoil profile at the front of the bike, Cannondale actually licensed a patented concept from HED that is not actually about the rim design or depth, but the angle at which a line tangent to the tire’s curve and that of the rim intersect. By doing so, Cannondale could spec that 23c (really 26mm wide in the end) tire that remains much narrower than the overall rim to get ideal airflow from tire across the rim across a real world range of yaw angles – where a narrower rim or wider tire would normally create more turbulence and airflow separated from the rim as you rode.

Besides working well with that (still) narrow 26mm overall tire, because of the wide rim shape you don’t see much loss in aero gains with a 25c/28mm wide tire (still apparently beating out most other aero wheels on the market). Interestingly, in our rides together, it looked like Cannondale’s own aero engineer was himself riding the wheels with this wider 25c/28mm setup. The Knot64 wheels aren’t super light, but for that wide & deep of a profile, their 1642g weight isn’t bad either (765g front, 877g rear).

Knot aero seatpost

The bike gets a surprisingly deep & narrow Knot seatpost. It offers a good bit of saddle adjustability, and works together with an integrated wedge-style seatpost clamp. Its design though focused around providing smooth air movement with a narrow aerofoil shape where air is being compressed and sped up around spinning legs.

Knot SystemBar integrated bar & stem cockpit

Delivering on the concept of a low drag once-piece bar & stem, but retaining adjustability, the Knot SystemBar mixes a carbon bar to an alloy stem in the two-piece integrated system. It delivers 8° of adjustment to fine tune the angle of the deep, flat carbon bar top, while also including a forged aluminum stem with a hollow section where cables can be routed internally.

Cables underneath get covered with a composite guide that directs them down into the open chamber at the front of the headtube. The stem also gets some trick integrated spacers underneath that help guide the cables, but can be popped on and off without having to reroute/open up any cable loops. In the end that doesn’t give too much range of adjustability because the steerer needs to be cut below the top of the stem, but it is a bit more serviceable.

Powermeter Spec

Power2Max spiders come pre-installed on the Hi-mod models of the SystemSix. You get cadence measurement for free, but have the option to ‘activate’ the strain gauges inside direct from Power2Max for $490€. Cannondale says it was about making power meters more accessible, so they deliver the hardware to make it possible, and users have the choice to pay Power2Max or not to activate the software side. Some might balk at the idea of paying to turn on a technology already on the bike. But Cannondale looks at it as them providing the hardware at no extra cost to the rider, then the technology & software that is where most of the power meter development costs go to can be activated from Power2Max over Bluetooth for a lower cost than buying the power meter from the start. Win, win?

Complete Bike Specs, Pricing & Availability

The new SystemSix comes in three complete specs, plus a $4200 frameset (with just frame, fork & seatpost) for the top high modulus frameset. Two more complete bikes use standard modulus frames to bring the price down. All of those (except the women’s) come in a seven size range (47-62cm.) Cannondale is also looking to improve rider safety even on pro-level bikes, with all of these models getting a variable amount of reflectivity in their paint jobs.

The top spec is a $11000/10500€ SystemSix Mi-Mod Dura-Ace Di2 build that gets the fully integrated, internally routed groupset, plus the Knot64 aero wheels & Knot SystemBar, and the ready-to-activate Power2Max spider.

Next the SystemSix Hi-Mod Ultegra Di2 for $7500€ gets the Knot64 wheels, integrated Knot cockpit, Power2Max spider, and a full Ultegra Di2 drivetrain.

Then the only women-specific bike of the bunch, the SystemSix Hi-Mod Women’s gets a Dura-Ace mechanical groupset, the Knot64 wheels, Power2Max spider, but swaps in a Vision Metron bar setup with shorter stems, narrower bars, and women-specific saddle for $7500€, but only in three sizes (47, 51 & 54).

For the standard mod carbon bikes, the $6000/5800€ Dura-Ace build is the only to keep the wide aero Knot64 carbon wheels and their wide tire aero benefits. With a mechanical drivetrain setup, it also gets external routing from the bar into the downtube and features a more conventional Vision handlebar.

Below that a $4000€ a SystemSix Ultegra uses standard carbon, a standard bar, mechanical groupset, and gets a conventional 35mm deep Fulcrum alloy wheelset.

All of the bikes are slated for September 2018 retail availability.

courtesy Cannondale, riding photos by Brian Vernor

We’ll have a First Rides impressions review soon to give you a further look at the bike and our thoughts on how fast & comfortable it really is.

Cannondale.com/TheSystemSix

28 COMMENTS

    • They’re saying it without knowledge of any upcoming debuts from other manufacturers. There’s a few days left, and some will likely come out the day of.

      Buy an aero bike if you like the aesthetics and can suffer some service hassles. Let’s not pretend the difference is there unless you’re already placing well.

      • The difference is there if the bike is moving. Doesn’t matter much where you’re placing. Try one sometime..

        • Sorry but have to disagree. I’ve ridden S-Works Venge and pretty non aerodynamic allez over the last few years ; loved the stiffness on the Venge but was actually faster on the Non aero bike because I could get my body in a more aerodynamic position. My experience is that frames aren’t like wheels you slap on a set of 808’s or 404’s and you feel the difference right away. Yeah there might be a difference in the data but in the real world I absolutely make sure I’ve got aero wheels for racing but when I had both frames I gravitated towards the cheaper and more comfy allez difference in short <90 mile cat 3 races isn’t that much.

          ***PSA if you get dropped doing anything in cycling and your equipment is working the way it’s supposed to than then no matter how much you spend on equipment it will will not allow you to hang in the group the engine is still the most important part of all of this.

  1. I’m going to use this to state my displeasure about the current state of thru axles on road disc.

    Back in QR days, if you broke or somehow needed a new QR, any QR would work. It was universal. TA? No, not universal to any degree.

    Diameter: Bike specific…not universal (seems like road is at least going 12mm)
    Length: Bike specific…not universal
    Thread pitch: Bikes specific (if there are even threads..i.e. RAT)
    QR vs bolt style: Bike specific (I wouldn’t use a bolt style on an unprotected carbon drop out)

    My TA failed this weekend (tension adjustment thread on a QR-TA rolled…because they are aluminum). I have access to a machine shop so I was able to fix it, but if I didn’t it looks like a minimum 1 week (non-expedited) to get my proprietary TA in. I have a “race” this weekend. Not even sure the price yet as I’m waiting for the shop to call back.

    All this on top of that fact that I am unsure what a TA does on a rigid road frame. The disc is located by the mating of the fork to the hub. Its all held together by tension. The TA holes in any fork or dropout I’ve seen are too sloppy to act as a locating feature. I’m convinced the majority of people that have 9mm QR disc brake issues (on rigid frames) just don’t know how to work a normal 9mm QR assembly. Rant over.

    • I have a Caad10 post mount disc with QR axles. I use Dura Ace skewers. I’ve never had disc rub. I’ve never had a problem with rotor and caliper alignment. It has been a trouble free existence.

      I can’t say the same for my flat mount TA bike. The flat mount is much less tolerant of frame/fork mount imperfections so setup is trickier. But hey, it looks better and that’s what’s important, right?

    • Lots of bikes going to the same TA now, so I guess you were just a bit too early to get the benefit of standardization? My 2016 Crux uses the same thru axles as my 2018 Canyon Aeroad. The rear hub of the Crux is even stupid SCS and it still uses a standard DT Swiss TA. And as far as the locating goes, both use a taper on the non-threaded side of the fork, so it self-centers every time.

      I think the problem here is that there is a misconception that putting in a TA is sooooo slow, so companies try to innovate to make the removal and install quicker. In reality, it doesn’t take that long to twist a handle around 6 or so times and once they are installed and tight, they don’t come loose.

      • 2018 Cervelo R3D. Warranty frame so hard to complain, but the RAT design TA is not a particularly great one, imo.

  2. (climbing bike is faster for more than 6% slope)
    “that only really works for a mountain top finish, because this thing descends faster too.”

    I’m happily trade down hill speed for up hill speed. I’m a scared descender.

  3. Fastest bike?…may be. But im more interwsted in their results when they say scott foil is one of the highest drag. Almost all group tests show the foil is one of the fastest….

    Sure looks like a colnago concept tho….

    • I’m positive the Scott Foil isn’t one of the fastest… Tube shapes need to be deep, narrow, and have a good curvature. It may have a nicely engineered curve but the shapes aren’t deep or narrow by today’s standards. I believe Cannondale’s chart for the most part.

      The Foil may be light by comparison. That was probably their trade-off.

  4. I was going to crap on their visual design, continuing their dominance as the worst paint in the industry, but some of those colors aren’t bad (love the purple). It would be a shame, though, if you can’t get the high-mod in a choice of color.

    Still sad that viewing the bike from the side reads “annondale.”

    I’m curious to look at the geometry and get more detail on the stem.

  5. A cool looking bike. But do we know what wheels were on the comparison bikes? Without knowing that these numbers tell me pretty much nothing. Maybe that Scott Foil was tested on mtb wheels? 🙂
    Also, were sizes and setups identical? Etc…

  6. I don’t know why people pay a premium for C-Dale over Canyon and equal to companies like Trek, Specialized, and Giant. Not to say any of the major brands is perfect but…..Our club used to be sponsored by a Cannondale/Trek dealer (why someone sponsored a bunch of lame as hell masters racers I’ll never know) and so tons of the folks I’ve ridden with pretty heavily over the last few years have either one or the other. Again not saying this is an empirical trial but overwhelmingly the Cannondale’s have had far more issues specifically around issues with tolerances in the BB shells and drop outs. Cannondale’s warranty support was been worth less than the paper it’s written on. I’ve owned two of their bikes brand new from a licensed dealer, a CaadX and a super six Evo HM. Both had off sized bb shells (CaadX crushed all bearings that were pressed in by the shop) and the Super Six Evo has a massive drop out alignment issue both of which had warranties declined by Cannondale with lame responses such as “just use 23mm tires”. In the rare circumstances I’ve had to warranty a bike Specialized went above and beyond to remedy the issue even though the shop I bought it at was pretty terrible to deal with. The logo misalignment is typical Cannondale and a sign that they haven’t changed in the last 2 years since I ditched them.

  7. All that effort into making the “world’s fastest bike” and they forgot to make an integrated aero GPS mount (under the bar). The GPS mount is a bolt-on afterthought that looks ridiculous

  8. can you beleive anything they say if they cant even design a bike where you can see the name the chainring is blocking the “C” in cannondale.

  9. If you’re going to equip a bike with a power-meter, and are effectively paying for it when you purchase the bike. I don’t think the consumer should have to pay a second time to use what they have already paid for.
    Not cool.

    • ^This. It’s a bit like a bait and switch. Yeah, you physically get a power meter, but then you have to pay to turn the damned thing on.

COMMENT HERE: (For best results, log in through Wordpress or your social media account. Anonymous/fake email comments may be unapproved or deleted. ALL first-time commenter's posts are held for moderation. Check our Comment Policy for full details.)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.