Home > Bike Types > Mountain Bike

Shimano 12-speed Mountain Bike Groups – Complete Tech Comparison!

Shimano 12 speed mountain bike group component comparison with all four derailleurs lined up
35 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Shimano’s 12-speed mountain bike group lineup is finally complete, so how do they all compare? What’s the real differences between Deore, SLX, XT and XTR? Which parts are worth upgrading? Why is one better than the other? How do the actual weights compare?

Having literally travelled around the world to attend the XTR launch in Japan, and to Bellingham for the XT/SLX launch, I was surprised at how much more there was to learn.

shimano 12 speed mountain bike groups in boxes

This video and post is the result of nearly a week’s worth of research, hours on the phone with Shimano’s technical reps, and tons of back and forth email. It is the reference on what separates Deore from SLX, XT from XTR; and how Dynamic Chain Engagement and HyperGlide+ work.

Yep, it’s a long video. But if you’ve ever wondered what really makes one component better than the other, it’s all explained right here…

Shimano 12-Speed MTB Group Comparison

Across all of the parts, you’ll notice four main things as you move up the line:

  • Appearance: Finishes differ slightly and are fancier on higher end parts.
  • Tolerances: The top end parts have tighter tolerances, getting better and better as you go up the line.  The fit and finish of the top end groups is going to look and feel more premium, and is measurably better.
  • Weight: Things get lighter as you go up the line.
  • Durability: All of Shimano’s parts are durable, but the materials used in XT and XTR are less prone to wear. And, generally, anytime the tolerances are more exact, things tend to develop less play and last longer.

It’s worth noting that more pieces and parts on the high end components are made in Japan, in Shimano’s own factory, where higher QC standards apply than their other factories in other countries. Even the weight range has a tighter tolerance, which is why you won’t see a claimed published weight for Deore 6100 parts, but you will for the rest.
This also explains why XTR has a 3-year warranty while the other groups have two years.

Fun Fact: Technically, XT is “Deore XT”, and should be referred to as such if you ever find yourself in the hallowed halls of Shimano. But for brevity, we’re calling it by it’s street name, XT.

Shimano 12-Speed Chain Comparison

parts of a shimano 12 speed mountain bike chain

We’re starting with chains because the technologies and designs used here help make things like DCE and HyperGlide+ possible. So, understanding their design helps us understand why Shimano’s drivetrains work so well. And their select use of two materials – SIL-TEC and Chromizing – show how they differentiate otherwise very similar looking parts. So, a quick explanation of those:

  • SIL-TEC: an advanced plating process that bonds fluorine particles to the metal to create a long lasting, ultra low friction surface. It also helps reduce noise considerably. Shimano says Fluorine is a highly reactive material, so once it comes in contact the metal on the chain, it reacts vigorously and stays bonded and stops reacting with other materials. Meaning, it’s less likely to shed molecules as it slides over a gear’s teeth. And that, Shimano says, is a major part of friction – molecules reacting with each other between surfaces. So, the less things react with each other, the less friction you’ll have.
  • Chromizing: Chromium is diffused into the the metal to make it harder, so it’ll last longer. They’ve been using it for years, and it makes its way to all four 12-speed chains, but in different areas.

shimano 12 speed mountain bike chains comparison side by side

Used together, you get both benefits – more durability and less friction. But, Chromizing is a more expensive process, so in some cases, you’ll only see SIL-TEC being used, or only Chromizing. And sometimes both.

All four of these chains use the same plate shaping, and start with the same high quality steel chain. It’s the finishes that separate them. Here’s the breakdown:

Deore CN-M6100 Chain

  • Chromizing roller link pin
  • 252g

SLX CN-M7100 Chain

  • SIL-TEC roller link plate
  • Chromizing roller link pin
  • 252g

XT CN-M8100 Chain

  • No SIL-TEC
  • Chromizing roller link plates and pins
  • 252g

XTR CN-M9100 Chain

  • SIL-TEC pin link plates and roller
  • Chromizing roller link plates and pins
  • Upgrades to hollow pins (saves 10g)
  • 242g

Shimano 12-Speed Crank & Chainring Comparison

shimano xtr m9100 crank arms

For the cranks, all but Deore use their Hollowtech II construction, which basically means they’re hollow forged.

All of Shimano’s Hollowtech II cranks are made in Japan. As a side note, all higher end brakes are bled in Japan, but once you get down to Deore level, they’re done in Shimano’s Malaysia factory. None of their components are actually made by a 3rd party manufacturer, Shimano makes virtually everything they sell. But not everything is made at their Sakai Intelligent Plant at their headquarters in the Osaka, Japan. They save that place for their best stuff.

Here’s how the cranksets compare:

shimano deore m6100 crank arms

Deore FC-M6100-1

  • Forged, not hollow
  • Comes with chainring pre-installed
  • Color-shifting logos
  • 172/178mm Q-factor options
  • 789g w/ 32t ring

shimano SLX m7100 crank arms

SLX FC-M7100-1

  • Hollowtech II hollow forged arms
  • 172/178/181mm Q-factor options
  • 634g w/ 30t ring
  • 154g lighter than Deore

shimano xt m8100 crank arms

XT FC-M8100-1

  • Hollowtech II
  • Pared down arms, but very similar to SLX
  • 172/178/181mm Q-factor options
  • 622g w/ 30t ring
  • 12g lighter than SLX

2020 shimano xt M8100 and xtr M9100 cranksets side by side comparison

XTR FC-M9100-1

  • Hollowtech II, sort of – it’s a two-piece arm construction where top and bottom are forged separately, excess material is machined out, then they’re bonded together. Lets them remove more material to make them lighter
  • Integrated attachment bolt eliminates dual pinch bolts
  • Narrower 162/168/171mm Q-factor options
  • 528g w/ 30t ring
  • 94g lighter than XT

What do Shimano’s model numbers mean?

shimano component model number diagram showing what the numbers mean for the specs and features

Regarding their numerical naming scheme, each number references something, helping you make sure you’re getting the right part for your build. The image above is a general breakdown based on XT, but you’d want to double check the specs before buying.

xtr lock ring install bolt compared to xt pinch bolt design on crank arms
XTR’s integrated bolt with bezel adjustment (left) compared to the traditional Shimano pinch bolt design on XT (right).

It’s worth pointing out that XT and XTR used to have RACE and TRAIL versions. They still have them, they just don’t call them “Trail” and “Race” anymore. Instead, they’re named numerically, and XTR has dramatically narrower options than the rest. If you’re considering the narrower ones, you’ll want to check to make sure they’ll clear some wider Boost or SuperBoost frame’s chainstays. If in doubt, go with a wider crankset, it’s only a few millimeters difference anyway.

What about the chainrings?

shimano 12 speed chainrings for deore, slx, xt and xtr shown side by side in a comparison

Shimano’s higher end cranks don’t have the chainrings installed. That’s because for SLX, XT and XTR, they’re sold separately.

While Deore’s chainring looks like a standard four-bolt affair, it’s not. Deore uses a more traditional looking spider, but it’s actually a direct-mount item that’s one unit. The spider is alloy, with a steel chainring permanently attached to it. So if you want to replace the chainring, you’re replacing that whole assembly. But don’t worry, they’re cheap.

shimano slx versus xt versus xtr chainring comparison
Clockwise from top: XTR, XT, and SLX. All photos ©Bikerumor/Tyler Benedict

SLX and XT chainrings both use an alloy carrier with steel outer teeth, which get an anodized surface treatment to improve durability. They look very similar, other than XT getting an anodized carrier where SLX is painted. The real difference is the composite middle section.

On XT, it’s a Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic.

But on SLX, it’s a Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic.

Shimano tells us XT’s carbon one will be slightly stiffer, and maybe a couple grams lighter. It’s not really about the weight, though. It’s about giving it a better strength to weight ratio. And that helps explain why the XT rings cost about twice as much as SLX.

XTR is a one-piece, all-aluminum chainring with a very expensive surface treatment to bring its durability up to comparable levels as the steel chainrings on the others. So, it’s a lot lighter, but just as durable.

backside of shimano 12 speed chainrings with dynamic chain engagement plus details

All 12-speed chainrings use Shimano’s Dynamic Chain Engagement+, which is their unique take on a narrow-wide design. For the best explanation/demonstration of how this works, the video shows how the wide teeth interface with the chain, and how the chain’s design prevents vibration and noise. It’s rad. I know, 29 minutes. It’s worth it.

Shimano 12-Speed Cassette Comparison

shimano 12 speed mountain bike cassettes side by side comparison
Counter-clockwise from top left: Deore, SLX, XT and XTR.

The biggest differences between Shimano’s 12-speed mountain bike cassettes are the materials used to increase durability or reduce weight.

All four use HyperGlide+, which is Shimano’s latest shifting design and it relates to the shaping that helps the chain shift more quickly and smoothly in both directions…up and down.

shimano 12 speed mountain bike cassettes side by side comparison

While they offer smaller, tighter range 10-45 cassettes for the race groups, we’re comparing the more popular 10-51 cassettes here, all of which have the same gear steps:

(2-2-2-2) (3-3) (4) (5) (6-6-6)

shimano 12 speed mountain bike cassettes smallest two cogs connection point close up

Shimano’s Micro Spline freehub body still uses a timing groove, meaning, one groove that’s larger than the others. This is necessary because it’s not a full one-piece cassette, so they have to make sure every cog lines up correctly with the one before it in order for the HyperGlide+ to work properly.

Fun Fact: Shimano says if you want HG+ to actually work as intended, you’ll need to use their 12-speed mountain bike chains, with all their chamfers and shaping.

close up showing how smallest two cogs on shimano 12 speed mountain bike cassettes connect on the microspline freehub body

One of the most interesting feature is how the smallest two cogs connect with the others.

The 10t and 12t cogs barely sit on the freehub body’s splines, if at all, and so they actually rely on these tiny grooves to lock into the the bigger cog behind it. They don’t look like much, but they get the job done.

Wondering why they do it this way? It lets them mix materials, using titanium and alloy to save more weight, and keep manufacturing costs down…which helps make it more affordable for you, too.

Ok, let’s compare the cassettes:

DEORE CS-M6100

  • All steel cogs
  • Including a steel lock ring
  • Painted spider
  • 589g

SLX CS-M7100

  • 11 smallest cogs are steel
  • 1 largest is aluminum, and it’s anodized
  • Keeps the painted spider
  • 534g
  • 55g savings over Deore

XT CS-M8100

  • Bottom 10 cogs are steel
  • 2 largest are anodized alloy
  • Also keeps the painted spider
  • 470g
  • 64g savings over SLX

XTR CS-M9100

  • 4 smallest are steel
  • 5 middle cogs are Titanium
  • 3 largest are aluminum
  • Upgrades to anodized spider
  • Upgrades to a special hard plating on aluminum cogs, which are then painted black. This improves overall alloy cog durability compared to the anodizing process used for SLX & XT.
  • 367g
  • 103g savings over XT

Shimano 12-Speed Shifter Comparison

shimano 12 speed mtb shifters compared side by side

The shifters have a few obvious differences on the outside, including how much adjustment range they have when used with iSpec brake lever clamps. But the biggest differences are internal and have to do with their feel and functionality.

All of them come in I-SPEC EV or Clamp Band mounting options. If you’re using the I-SPEC mounts, they all have a 14mm left-to-right slide adjustment range, so you can position the shifter farther inboard or outboard.

But I-Spec EV also allows for rotational adjustment in relation to the brake lever, and you’ll see some differences between the models. The rotation ranges mentioned below are actually based on the adjustment window on the brake lever, not the shifter. So, if you put a Deore shifter on an XTR brake lever, it would have 60º of rotational adjustment.

shimano 12 speed mtb shifters compared side by side with top down view
Counter-clockwise from top left: Deore, SLX, XT and XTR.

DEORE SL-M6100

  • RapidFire Plus (which means you can downshift up to three easier gears at a time)
  • Two-Way Release (which means you can push or pull to upshift to a harder gear)
  • 10º of i-SPEC rotation angle adjust
  • OptiSlick cables
  • 132g (with band clamp, not I-Spec EV like others listed here)

SLX SL-M7100

  • RapidFire Plus
  • Two-Way Release
  • 20º of i-SPEC rotation angle adjust
  • Some covers and small parts made of glass fiber reinforced plastic
  • The lever bodies are steel and glass fiber plastic, too, same for Deore
  • Levers rotate on bushings inside the shell, same for Deore
  • OptiSlick cables
  • 117g
  • (a few grams) lighter than Deore

XT SL-M8100

  • RapidFire Plus, increased to four shifts
  • Two-Way Release
  • Adds Multi-Release, letting you upshift two gears at once if you want
  • Also adds Instant release, meaning it shifts on the click, not the release
  • 20º of i-SPEC rotation angle adjust
  • Main lever upgrades to full aluminum construction with a grooved rubber grip pad
  • Inside, it upgrades the lever and other movements to use two bearings
  • 117g
  • Same weight as SLX

XTR SL-M9100

  • Same RapidFire Plus, Two-Way/Multi/Instant release features of XT
  • 60º of i-SPEC rotation angle adjust
  • Upgrades to a slicker Polymer-coated cable
  • Inside, it upgrades to four bearings
  • Covers and small parts upgraded to carbon fiber reinforced plastic
  • Release lever upgraded to carbon fiber reinforced plastic
  • 112g
  • 5g lighter than XT

Shimano 12-Speed Rear Derailleur Comparison

all four shimano 12 speed MTB rear derailleurs compared side by side
Counter-clockwise from top left: Deore, SLX, XT and XTR.

All four 12-speed rear derailleurs use Shimano’s Shadow+ design, which basically means two things: First, that it’s a low profile design that doesn’t stick out from the chainstay so it’s less likely to get hit on a rock, tree, whatever.

Second, it’s the clutch, which helps the system stay quieter and keep your chain from bouncing so hard it comes off the chainring.

From there, it’s largely about materials differences and, again, the manufacturing technique and precision tolerances. And the shaping of the parallelograms and other body parts. Which is why you don’t see a ton of differences in the bullet point specs below, but you’ll see more physical differences when looking at them side by side (shown in video).

DEORE RD-M6100-SGS

  • The pivot points on the parallelogram are moving on flouric coated bushings (same for all four derailleurs)
  • Bushings inside pulley wheels
  • Hollow stainless steel main bolt
  • Steel pulley cage plates
  • Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic (GFRP) body parts
  • 318g

SLX RD-M7100-SGS

  • SLX and up add a bumper plate to pulley cage
  • Keeps the bushings in the pulleys, but tighter tolerances
  • Upgrades to anodized hollow stainless steel main bolt
  • Painted Alloy pulley cage plates
  • 316g
  • 2g lighter than Deore

XT RD-M8100-SGS

  • Upgrades to sealed bearings inside the pulleys, so they roll faster & easier
  • Anodized hollow stainless steel main bolt
  • Painted alloy pulley cage plates
  • 285g
  • 31g lighter than SLX

XTR RD-M9100-SGS

  • Also uses sealed bearings inside the pulley wheels
  • Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) body parts
  • Where the other three have 7 fluoric coated link bushings, XTR gets 8
  • Upgrades to alloy adjusting screw
  • Upgrades to alloy main bolt
  • Anodized alloy inner cage, CFRP outer plate
  • Much more chiseled and shaped to remove weight
  • 237g
  • 48g lighter than XT

Other notes: XTR is the only 12-speed RD available in GS Medium Cage (for 10-45 cassettes). SLX, XT and XTR come in MX120 designs for use with 2×12 drivetrains, but Deore is 1×12 only.

Corrections from video: In the video I mistakenly say that Deore and up get the bumper plate on the pulley cage, but it’s only on SLX and higher. Also, Deore through XT use stainless B-axles (main mounting bolt), in the video I incorrectly say SLX and XT have alloy bolts.

top view of shimano xt m8100 rear derailleur top view of shimano xtr m9100 rear derailleur

A visual comparison between XT (top) and XTR (bottom) shows how Shimano removes more material from higher end derailleurs to save more weight. You can see more examples of this in the video.

Shimano 12-Speed MTB Group Actual Weights

(Weights & Pricing will be added as a chart here soon, so you’ll be able to find it all in one place. Follow us on social for an update when this is added. In the meantime, you can find all of that info throughout this story and in the posts linked below.)

For more information on each group, check out the launch coverage and first impressions at the following links:

Bike.Shimano.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
BlackWaterCyclist
4 years ago

Great breakdown Tyler! I appreciate you taking the time to do this.

Frank
Frank
4 years ago

Want to love these groupsets, but shimano is doing a solid sram on this release by putting the product testing solidly in the consumers hands.

So far its been plagued with, Clutch failures, b nuckle cast failures, backplate failures, chainring ‘bolt’ failures, cassette pin failures, hub failures, bar mount shifter failures. Looks like they made a good chain though right?

And of course its always the first of that failure they’ve seen, and they have replaced it under good faith.

Shafty
Shafty
4 years ago
Reply to  Frank

Sure, “plagued”, right. Must be why we haven’t seen any of those failures at our shop despite plenty of bikes equipped with them. Not saying you haven’t seen failures, that’s a real thing, but it’s a bit dramatic to claim it’s common.

Shimano has been helpful dealing with warranty issues and usually provides little resistance to issuing a replacement. It’s been refreshing to deal with that vs the Sram 20 questions. Then again, Sram has online submission, so pick your poison.

Anecdotes really aren’t worth much….

Dockboy
Dockboy
4 years ago
Reply to  Shafty

Literally every 12 speed XT derailleur I have seen has had a cracked b knuckle. I have seen exactly one.

FritzP
FritzP
4 years ago

Thanks for this great overview of the groups. The new Shim 12 spd shifting is marvelous! The shift quality is very quick, precise and quiet, up or down and under load. The shifter feel is really refined: precise and light and fast and multi-release is excellent.

The XTR freehub mechanism is fantastic being mostly silent. Do the other hubs have the same mech? The Shim exploded diagrams show the XTR internals are the same as the Scylence parts pictured in all the launch pictures but its not called Scylence now that parts are shipping.

One distinction that I’ve read about is that XTR bearings are laser scanned and sorted into bins of higher tolerance then installed in the hubs as matched sets. Can this be confirmed?

Also, on the rear der does XTR use more forged parts vs cast parts in lower tiers? The distinction being forged are stronger (so can be made lighter), can be polished and therefore anodized where the cast parts can’t be polished and are painted. Curious if that is all true.

Can brakes and hubs be added to the overview?

Thanks again!

Tim
Tim
4 years ago
Reply to  Tyler Benedict

Great article! Thanks for doing this! I’d never heard before that XT and XTR are nearly silent- is that true??

tech9
4 years ago

still no di2… 🙁

Dolan Halbrook
Dolan Halbrook
4 years ago

Thanks for this! It would be great to have steet prices with the different parts to help determine bang for the buck. Seems like the XTR cassette is a big winner in that it saves a ton of weight and will help the rear suspension, but it’s also over twice the cost of the XT version. Decisions, decisions.

threeringcircus
threeringcircus
4 years ago

Dumb question but something I’ve always wondered…what’s the correct pronunciation of “Deore”? Dee-ohr? Dee-o-ray? Day-ohr?

Dockboy
Dockboy
4 years ago
Reply to  Tyler Benedict

My favorite Shimano mispronunciation is Dura-atchey

luggednut
luggednut
4 years ago
Reply to  Dockboy

@Dockboy–I knew a mechanic many years ago that pronounced Dia-Compe–Dia Compy…of course Tange is Tan-gay…

Vincent Riboulet
Vincent Riboulet
4 years ago

Nice article.
I would have like to see the different option for cranks lenght, especially 180mm.

Moby
Moby
4 years ago

I just finished demo’ing a number of bikes in search of a new marathon/ultra/stage race bike. I have been a die hard Shimano fan since ’88 (first “real” road bike in my early teens). I went di2 with the original Ultegra 10 speed e-tube release and have since had 4 DI2 bikes (including my gravel race bikes, which for the last ~5 years have been Shimano “mullets” of R785/GRX DI2 shifters and XTR DI2 derailleurs before SRAM coined the term). Hate the GRX shifter ergonomics.

But 12 speed Shimano really failed to impress me. Both XT and XTR. I don’t find XTR shifting meets the praise. 2 caliper XT brakes suck. Really (when I mentioned this to various shops they all agreed). And still no word on 12 speed DI2. Really disappointing given Shimano’s track record. I hope this is an anomaly, forced by playing catch up SRAM’s domination of MTB. Not a justification, but I could understand it.

I just went XX1 AXS/G2 Ultimate/Quarq on my new race bike. Sorry Shimano, I tried to wait but what I’ve seen is a swing and a miss. If I like AXS I will switch my 3T Exploro over next spring as well because, well, GRX ergos are that bad. If I don’t like it I’ll switch the Exploro to DA shifters and keep praying to the Shimano Gods for 12 speed DI2.

Craig
Craig
4 years ago
Reply to  Moby

Your experience is interesting Moby. After owning several bikes with Sram ranging from NX, GX, XX1, I’ve now got a bike with 12 spd Shimano XT and am really enjoying the performance. I did swap the XT shifter to SLX as SLX seems to have much lighter indexing force which suits my bad thumb better. And I run dual piston XT brakes with Ice Tech rotors and they’re great. The bike is a 150mm trail bike, I’m 92kg and having ridden MTB for 30 years I’m of reasonably good skill level. I’m a fan of Sram but have come quite disappointed with what either seems poor quality control, wildly variable tolerances or just bad design.

Moby
Moby
4 years ago
Reply to  Craig

Frankly, I was really surprised as well. Like I said, huge Shimano fan. So pretty disappointed with the performance. I’ve stayed away from SRAM because I keep hearing experiences like yours. But one of the bikes I demo’d had GX and I thought it shifted better than 12 speed XT. Not better than XTR but I wasn’t wow’d by XTR and I’m continuing to hear minor rumblings of durability issues with the 12 speed. Of course, Internet, so FWIW.

So I decided to experiment. At some point you never know until you try. I might be disappointed in XX1 AXS. But the lack of a DI2 story (I’m probably the minority here) and not being impressed with XTR mechanical were enough to make me venture out. If I hate it I’ll sell it and revert to XTR.

Onrhodes
4 years ago

How can you skip the hubs?!?!?

Derek Anderson
Derek Anderson
4 years ago

I’ve been running GX eagle for 2 years with no problems, but tore the knuckle in half on my second ride on my new XT mech, while putting down power on a rough climb. Anecdotal yes, but not confidence inspiring.

This one still goes to 11
This one still goes to 11
4 years ago

Any notes on XTR 11 speed compatibility?

Onrhodes
4 years ago

I hear the brakes and front hub have no compatibility issues…. 🙂 sorry couldn’t resist.

Dylan
Dylan
4 years ago

It’s a real Shimano thing. My Deore DX derailleur failed at the B knuckle too, and it was only 20 years old when it did

lol
lol
4 years ago

Now do 12 speed road groups awwwwwwww

JC
JC
4 years ago

I have two bikes with m9100 drivetrains and brakes. I have had issue after issue:
Creaky cassette/Microspline on both bikes.
Broken shifter(down shifter paddle won’t shift down sporadically).
Chain broke during a sprint(went down hard, super lucky it wasn’t much worse).
Brake pistons stick on one side of the caliper causing the disc to be out of alignment and rub. Now on the third time the shop has had to clean the caliper/pistons.
Creaky, noisy clutch.
Clutch lever made of plastic, and broke off during riding.
Seals on the 3 sets of m9100 pedals continually move out on the spindle and allow for dust to get in the peddle and bearings. And allow for movement and rocking of the peddle on the spindle.

The amount of money I have spent on XTR just to have it cause so many problems is unacceptable. Shimano XTR used to be the pinnacle of reliability. Not anymore! This product has been a complete failure.
What were they thinking with Microspline? They could have went with a one-piece cassette and they didn’t. That is my single biggest gripe. The cassette sounds awful on both my bikes.

None Given
None Given
4 years ago

Instead of trying to figure out the code for the cranks….simply get a Rotor Kapic crank…change your BB spindle as needed (regular, Boost, SuperBoost).

threeringcircus
threeringcircus
4 years ago

Thanks!

Seraph
Seraph
4 years ago

Even if you’re not a Shimano person, this is a great article for reference material.

mayyak
mayyak
4 years ago

is there any similar tech comparison of road groups (D-A, Ultegra and 105)?

Roy
Roy
4 years ago

You didn’t mention about the spring materials used on the rear derailleur. Is it true xtr uses Titanium? Or they all use steel springs that’s why you didn’t care to mention.

Philippe Richard-Robitaille
Philippe Richard-Robitaille
4 years ago

Wow great breakdown of the difference, super interesting. Keep up the god content guys!

Dennis Legaspi
Dennis Legaspi
4 years ago

would love to see your feed on how the derailluers are bended and twisted to accommodate the extremes of shifting.

Anthony Consolazio
Anthony Consolazio
4 years ago

Would like to see actual weights of the different level chainrings included. Most articles fail to mention that about half of the weight difference between Deore XT and XTR cranks is attributed to the chainring. You did mention that the higher end cranks do not include the rings, why not go one step further and point out that selecting an XTR ring for an XT crank will get you most of the weight savings at a steep discount over the full XTR setup?

Rye
Rye
3 years ago

Ladies and gents, thank you for putting this together! Well produced, excellent and technically descript content. Truly invaluable! Thank you!

Lars P. Mikkelsen
Lars P. Mikkelsen
1 year ago

I mean a more narrow range than the 10-51T but still compatible with the MICRO SPLINE freehub body. I am newer using the lager one here in flat Denmark.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.