Home > Reviews > Clothes & Gear Reviews

Get In-Vest-ed: Cycling Hydration Vest Faceoff

group image of 5 cycling hydration vestsFive of the hydration vest packs we tested. (photo/Jeremy Benson)
10 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

The ways we carry water and gear while we ride have been in a constant state of flux for as long as I can remember. While cages and water bottles have remained relatively constant, the systems used for carrying water on our bodies have changed frequently over the years. For cyclists of all types, one of the most recent hydration pack styles to really catch on is the hydration vest — aka: cycling vest, hydration pack, or vest pack.

Of course, hydration vests are nothing new. Runners have been using vest-style packs for many years, as have plenty of savvy, ahead-of-the-curve, trend-setting cyclists. While they are similar to the more traditional hydration backpacks that so many of us used to wear, the vest-style design has some distinct advantages. Most notably, the small footprints and vest-style straps result in impressive stability. Most of these packs also make it very easy to drink while riding, carry tools and other gear, and keep some essentials easily accessible, too.

With their growing popularity among cyclists of all types, the number of cycling hydration vests on the market is increasing in kind. Now, seemingly every pack brand has a vest model or several to choose from. To see how they compare, I rounded up five new/popular models for testing. For the past several months, I’ve cycled through these packs on my daily rides while considering important factors like fit, comfort, adjustability, stability, storage, pockets, and general ease of use. 

Likewise, my colleague Cory Benson (no relation) has three other models that he’s been testing separately. We’ll both provide our impressions of the packs we’ve tested, do our best to explain their differences, and point you in the right direction if you’re considering “investing” in a hydration vest for yourself.

Jeremy riding in a mountain bike race in 100 degree heat while wearing the Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5
Racing in 100-degree heat at the Downieville Classic a couple years ago. The Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5 was a game-changer. (photo/Tucker Adams)

Jeremy’s Hydration Vest Selection

I got my first hydration vest almost exactly two years ago. I had a big bike race coming up, and it was forecast to be 100 degrees F for both days of the two-day event. I was looking for something that would help me avoid heat exhaustion by increasing my water-carrying capacity while also making it easy to drink while racing, and, most importantly, not bounce around over rough terrain while riding. Numerous friends recommended the Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5, which I promptly purchased just days before the race. Since then, I’ve been using it regularly on any gravel or mountain bike ride that requires more water than I can carry in the bottles on my bikes. 

It’s fair to say that I’ve quickly become a big fan of hydration vests. Obviously, the ability to carry more water and consume it easily while riding is one of the main purposes, but its the streamlined fit and impressive stability that seals the deal. I’ve also really grown to appreciate the front pockets on the straps for keeping my phone and snacks easily accessible. Turns out, I enjoy functional equipment that’s user-friendly, convenient, and avoids being distracting or annoying while riding.

Jeremy holding five hydration vest pack models
From left to right: the Deuter Rogla 5, the Velocio Hydration Pack, the Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5, the High Above Supernatural, and the USWE Outlander Pro XC 2L. (photo/Heather Benson)

In addition to the Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5 that I already had, I picked up the USWE Outlander XC 2L, the Velocio Hydration Pack, the Deuter Rogla 5, and the High Above Supernatural. Below, you’ll find a quick rundown of all five models. As you’ll see, I have a personal favorite, but all of these packs work very well with some differences that may make them better suited to specific uses than others.

For sizing and fit reference, I’m 6’0” (183 cm) tall and weigh 170 pounds (77 kg). My chest measures 38 inches (96.5 cm) based on USWE’s chest circumference measurement. My shoulder width between the bony points (acromion process) is 16” across.

My Favorite Cycling Hydration Vest

  • MSRP: $130
  • Weight (incl. bladder): 354 g
  • Storage capacity: 1.5 L (3 L and 6 L options available)
  • Front pockets: 1 zippered and two stretch mesh
  • Water capacity: 1.5 L bladder included
  • Sizes: One size (33.5" to 47")
  • Fit adjustments: Adjustable side straps, and two adjustable sternum straps
  • Colors: Black, Steel

Pros

  • Excellent front pockets
  • Super stable
  • Streamlined
  • Simple but effective design
  • No quirks – easy to get along with
  • Surprisingly light

Cons

  • Minimal storage capacity (other sizes available)
  • Grey hose hides cleanliness
Best for Weight-Conscious Riders and Racing

  • MSRP: $199
  • Weight (incl. bladder): 285 g (size L/XL)
  • Storage capacity: Not specified (approx 1.5 L)
  • Front pockets: Two zippered and two stretch mesh
  • Water capacity: 1.5 L bladder included
  • Sizes: S, M, L, XL
  • Fit adjustments: Two adjustable sternum straps
  • Colors: Black, Spruce, Madder Green

Pros

  • Super lightweight
  • More breathable than most
  • Minimal race-oriented design

Cons

  • Expensive
  • Runs kinda small
  • No side adjustability
Great Mid-Sized Capacity

  • MSRP: $135
  • Weight (incl. bladder): 508 g
  • Storage capacity: 5 L
  • Front pockets: Two zippered pockets
  • Water capacity: 2 L bladder included
  • Sizes: One size
  • Fit adjustments: Two adjustable sternum straps, adjustable side straps.
  • Colors: Grove-ivy, graphite-shale

Pros

  • Well-organized storage
  • Great mid-size capacity
  • Streamlined fit
  • Stable

Cons

  • Not the lightest
  • Awkward hose keeper position
  • Might be a tight fit for those with larger chests
Most Durable, Best for Mountain Biking

  • MSRP: $240
  • Weight (incl. bladder): 575 g
  • Storage capacity: 6 L total, 4 L cargo
  • Front pockets: Two stretch mesh pockets
  • Water capacity: 2 L bladder included
  • Sizes: One size
  • Fit adjustments: Two adjustable sternum straps, adjustable side straps
  • Colors: Black, glacier gray

Pros

  • Made from very durable materials
  • Great weather resistance
  • Plenty of well-organized storage space
  • Very stable
  • Made in the USA

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Slightly heavier weight
Solid Value, Lightweight, Minimalist

  • MSRP: $110
  • Weight (incl. bladder): 385 g
  • Storage capacity: 2 L (numerous other options)
  • Front pockets: None
  • Water capacity: 1.5 L bladder included
  • Sizes: One size (chest circumference 33” to 43”)
  • Fit adjustments: Adjustable length shoulder and side straps
  • Colors: Black, blue, orange, pink, red flannel, bronze flannel

Pros

  • Affordable
  • Low profile
  • Relatively light
  • Simple and effective
  • Highly adjustable

Cons

  • Fixed hose attachment, no nozzle lock
  • Very little gear storage space (many other models/sizes available)
  • No front/chest pockets

Cycling Hydration Vests Tested By Cory

While Jeremy has become a full adoptee of hydration vests in recent years, I’m still a bit if a reluctant fan.

I came up mountain biking in the 1990s wearing all manner of Camelbaks on my back to carry water, food, clothing & spare parts when on-bike solutions weren’t really a good option and clothing carry was bad. But now bikes have plenty of cages, tool mounts, and even internal frame storage in most new models. Plus, clothing now also has great pockets (many tucked conveniently out of the way), improved structure, and often easy-access cargo pockets. So for regular rides and even some longer rides, I can easily do without the monkey of a pack on my back.

But the trick is, I’m getting older and sweatier.

So, when I want to go on a longer adventure ride, or even to ‘race’ longer distances, I need more water and snacks than fit on my bike and in my pockets. And now, modern hydration vests fit so much closer to the body, are more stable while riding both in the drops or down really rough terrain, and are so much lighter than more conventional cycling backpacks, so it’s simply a no-brainer to choose a vest on the bike these days.

The first one that really convinced me of the concept was the Apidura Racing Vest that I first tried late in 2021. I was doing a bunch of sub-24-hour overnighters through the winter and was making plans for spring bikepacking and summer gravel races. Slim enough to fit under a jacket, I found that next to the body, hydration bladders don’t freeze in sub-zero temps like the bottles do on your bikes. And by carrying 1-2 liters of fresh water on my back, I could stick to concentrated sports hydration mix in my bottles but still have plenty of water to make breakfast, coffee, brush my teeth, or even just to rinse out my mouth after eating an especially sweet and sticky energy bars.

So, while my brother from another mother occasionally wears them on daily rides, I was sold on the concept, too. But really, though, I still only wear the vests when it’s going to be an especially hot day or an especially long ride.

And yet, I sometimes use them without a bladder for short hikes in my nearby forests, as well. Whether that’s taking the dog for a longer walk or heading out for a full day hike. Again, these hydration vests are lighter and more compact than most regular multi-use backpacks, while offering plenty of storage for snacks, extra clothing layers, and drinks of all sorts — when the bladder is out, there’s always a lot of extra space.

For my sizing and fit reference, I’m a bit taller at 6’1” (185cm) and heavier at 190lb (86kg). My chest measures 40″ (102cm) according to the USWE measurement. My shoulder width between the bony points (acromion process) is 17” (43cm) across. So I’m also usually in the large sizes, but interestingly, sometimes I push the limits of one brand’s large, while others offer plenty of fit adjustability even in smaller sizes.

Light & Breathable

  • MSRP: $189 / 157€
  • Weight (incl. bladder) 406g L/XL:
  • Storage Capacity: 3.5L S/M or 5L L/XL
  • Water Capacity: roll-top 2L hydration bladder included
  • Sizes: Two sizes
  • Colors: Grey
  • Front: 2 mesh chest pockets plus zipper phone chest pocket
  • Rear: 2 zippered rear pockets
  • Hose: top routed hydration hose with magnetic clip fixed to lower chest strap
  • Fit adjustability: 2 adjustable height chest straps, side bungees straps
  • Extras: silver & yellow rear reflective details

Pros

  • Lightweight
  • Great mesh breathability on back & straps
  • Wide range of fit adjustability

Cons

  • Long bungees flap around while riding
  • Fixed magnetic holder on lower strap limits hydration hose adjustability
UK-Made and Perfect for Wet Weather

  • MSRP: $190 / 168€
  • Weight (incl. bladder): 521g S/M
  • Storage Capacity: 5.5L
  • Water Capacity: 2L roll-top bladder included
  • Sizes: Two sizes
  • Colors: Black
  • Front: 2 mesh chest pockets plus zipper phone chest pocket
  • Rear: 1 large zippered rear pocket, plus stretch mesh side pockets that can carry a water bottle each
  • Hose: ambidextrous top routed hydration hose with movable magnetic clip
  • Fit adjustability: 2 adjustable height chest straps with a whistle, 3-point cinch straps
  • Extras: silver & yellow rear reflective details

Pros

  • Made in the UK
  • Waterproof main body fabric
  • Orange pocket linings make it easy to find items inside
  • Wide fit range with secure side straps
  • Easy short or long hydration hose adjustability

Cons

  • Limited breathability
  • Relatively heavy
Stable & Easy to Load Even When Riding

  • MSRP: 170€
  • Weight (incl. bladder) 454g L/XL:
  • Storage Capacity: 3L
  • Water Capacity: roll-top 2L HydraPak hydration bladder included
  • Sizes: Two sizes
  • Colors: White/Grey
  • Front: 2 mesh chest pockets plus zipper phone chest pocket
  • Rear: 1 zippered rear pocket, large pass-through mesh pocket
  • Hose: right-only top or bottom routed hydration hose
  • Fit adjustability: 2 adjustable height chest straps, side bungees straps

Pros

  • Secure, stable fit
  • Streamlined
  • Rear mesh pocket is convenient to stuff large items while riding (clothing or extra bottles)

Cons

  • Limited adjustability, especially for larger riders
  • White mesh is difficult to clean

Cycling Hydration Vests Comparison Chart

ModelMSRPWeight (incl. bladder)Storage capacityWater capacity
Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5$130354g1.5 L cargo (3 L and 6 L options)1.5 L bladder incl.
Velocio Hydration Pack$199285g (L/XL)not specified: approx. 1.5 L1.5 L bladder incl.
Deuter Rogla 5$135508g5 L total, 3 L cargo2 L bladder incl.
High Above Supernatural$240575g6 L total, 4 L cargo2 L bladder incl.
USWE Outlander XC 2L$110385g2 L total. 0.5 L cargo1.5 L bladder incl.
Restrap Race Hydration Vest$205521g (S/M)5.5 L2 L bladder incl.
Apidura Racing Hydration Vest$217406g (L/XL)3.5 L (S/M), 5 L (L/XL)2 L bladder incl.
Canyon x Millet Sharp 3L$170451g (L/XL)3 L2 L bladder incl.

Cycling Hydration Vest Considerations

While most cycling hydration vests are relatively similar, there are a few factors to consider if you’re planning on “investing.” A couple of the most important considerations are bladder size and gear storage capacity. Of course, whether or not a pack will fit your body will also play a role in how well it will work for you, if at all.

The baffled 2 L bladder of the Supernatural pack.
All of the packs we tested come with either a 1.5-liter or 2-liter hydration bladder. Most have fold/slide tops. The baffled bladder of the High Above Supernatural helps it sit flatter when full. (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Water Capacity

One of the primary purposes of a hydration vest is hydration, of course, and models made for cycling almost always include a water bladder. In our experience, these bladders are most often made by Hydrapak, with capacities varying between 1.5 and 2 liters. You’ll obviously want to consider the amount of water you want/need to carry, and choose accordingly. 

Water also happens to be one of the heaviest things we carry with us when we ride. For reference, 2 liters is equal to 67.6 fluid ounces and weighs 2 kg (4.4 lbs.). 1.5 liters is equal to 52.9 ounces and weighs 1.5 kg (3.3 lbs.).

The magnetic hose clip on the Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5
Magnetic clips make it easy to remove and replace the hose/nozzle when drinking. (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Most hydration vest packs have an internal sleeve designed to hold the bladder closest to the rider’s back and separate it from the rest of the pack’s contents. Most of these bladders feature wide openings with folding tops and slide systems to seal them.

Hoses and Nozzles

A hose runs from the bottom of the bladder, over the shoulder, outside the pack, and secures near the nozzle onto the front of the pack with a magnetic or clip attachment. Most nozzles have a bite valve. Though they may differ slightly in design, these nozzles all function in roughly the same way. Pinch/bite the nozzle to open the valve and allow water to flow. Many nozzles also have a locking feature, so they can be turned off to prevent leaking while riding or in transit. Most, but not all, hoses have a quick-connect fitting that attaches to the bladder for easier bladder removal and cleaning.

Many vests default to routing the hose over the right shoulder, where you would normally grab it to drink with your right hand. In this case, they are typically looped down and secured somehow to the left chest/shoulder strap, usually with a magnet or mechanical hose clip. Some, but not all, also allow for ambidextrous left or right hose routing. And the select few allow you to either route the hose from the top (conventional) or from the bottom along the lower edge of the shoulder strap. Many drop bar riders prefer this lower routing as it shortens the hose length (meaning less warm water in the hose, and grams saved) and may simply feel like a more natural position to drink.

It’s worth mentioning that the hoses on hydration packs can also be cut to length. This may be beneficial for some riders, as the stock hose length may not be perfect for different builds and body sizes. Trimming a hose usually involves detaching the hose from the nozzle or the quick-connect fitting by the bladder, then cutting a small amount of hose off with a razor blade or sharp scissors. Remember to measure twice and cut once. We’ve found that it is generally best to start small and work your way up. You can always cut more off.

tools and other gear packing in the Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5
Storage capacities and layouts vary significantly. You can fit a surprising amount of gear into the open compartment of the Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5. (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Storage Capacity

In addition to water, hydration vests can typically carry some or all of your gear. There are lots of size options to choose from, of course, with some having room for just the essentials and others capable of fitting significant amounts of clothing, tools, and food. What works best will vary depending on your needs and what you carry with you when you ride. With the models we tested ranging from 1.5 to 6 liters of storage, and many brands offering their packs in multiple sizes, it’s easy to find the size that works best for you.

Some riders may only want their hydration vest to carry more water, and for those folks, a pack with a low storage volume may be the best choice. Packs like the Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5, Velocio Hydration pack, and the USWE Outlander XC 2L will carry your water plus a few other tools, snacks, and necessities. If you’re hoping to stuff a jacket, layer, extra gloves, and two pumps in your pack, then you’ll be better off looking into slightly larger packs like Deuter Rogla 5, High Above Supernatural, Restrap Race, or Apidura Racing Vests.

the front stretch pockets of the Velocio Hydration pack holing some nutrition.
Front pockets are one of the best things about most hydration vests. The Velocio Hydration Pack has both zippered and drop-in pockets on both straps. (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Front Pockets

The front pockets are also worth considering as these provide additional storage and easy access to things like your phone, gels, and snacks. If you’re the type of rider who likes to pull out their phone for pictures or maps while moving, or who is constantly snacking while rolling, these pockets are great. Most hydration vests have front pockets, although the layouts and their user-friendliness varies somewhat between brands and pack models.

Knee pads attached to the outside of the Deuter Rogla 5 pack
Stowable bungees on the Deuter Rogla 5 can be used to attach things like knee pads. (photo/Jeremy Benson)

External Storage

Some hydration vests include straps or bungees to attach bulkier items to the outside of the pack. This may be particularly useful for riders who carry knee pads, rain jackets, or like to climb without their helmet on, as it greatly expands the carrying capacity, making it possible to hold items that won’t fit inside. Both the Deuter Rogla 5 and the High Above Supernatural have integrated bungees to carry things on the outside of the pack.

The adjustable sternum straps on the Deuter Rogla 5 pack
It varies by brand, but most vest packs have dual sternum straps. These can usually be moved vertically to optimize their position on the chest and tightened/loosened for the appropriate level of tension. (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Fit and Sizing

Getting a properly fitting hydration pack is critical for your comfort and its stability. Too tight, and it can potentially restrict your breathing and cause discomfort over time. Too loose, and the pack can bounce around and be distracting. Most packs are adjustable within a given range to account for varying body sizes, shapes, and changing water/gear loads. Some packs come in multiple sizes, while others are one-size-fits-most.

Most brands have a sizing guide, and you should be able to find the right size pack by taking some measurements and referencing the size chart. For example, USWE lists a chest size fit range for each of its packs and includes a size guide that shows you how to measure your chest to determine your size. By measuring 360 degrees around your chest immediately below your breast, you should be able to determine your “chest circumference measurement.” 

the adjustable side strap on the Deuter Rogla 5
Many packs, like the Deuter Rogla 5, also have adjustable side straps to account for body size differences. (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Adjustments

Most packs also feature a number of adjustments to optimize the fit for your body shape and size. These typically include straps across the chest, which can be tightened/loosened for tension and sometimes shifted vertically to optimize their position on the chest. Many packs also include adjustable side straps to account for different torso shapes and sizes. These types of adjustments are critical for achieving the appropriate snugness on the body to maintain the pack’s stability without restricting breathing or causing discomfort.

The AirMesh back panel of the Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5
AirMesh materials like this on the Evoc Hydro Pro 1.5 aim to enhance breathability on the back and straps of the pack. (photo/Jeremy Benson)

Breathability

One of the biggest drawbacks to wearing a hydration vest — or strapping anything to your body, for that matter — is that it will always be hotter than not wearing one. While most brands and designs of hydration vests attempt to be breathable, there’s no denying the fact that all of them reduce airflow and increase sweatiness on the back and chest. Still, it’s a tradeoff that many people are willing to make to increase water carrying capacity and drinking convenience.

Every pack we tested uses some sort of air-permeable mesh material in the construction of the straps and back panel. These AirMesh — or similar — materials allow some air to pass through, letting speed-generated wind cool the body while allowing body heat and moisture to escape. These materials all work to some degree to promote breathability, but again, wearing a hydration vest is always hotter and sweatier than not wearing one at all.

A huge sweat stain on the back while wearing the Evoc Hydro Pro pack
After 5+ hours of racing, the sweat stains around the hydration vest are pretty obvious. (photo/Heather Benson)

Get In-Vest-ed

Vest-style hydration packs are trending, and for good reason. With water bladders and hoses making it easy to drink and super stable designs that don’t distract or annoy while you ride, we’ve become huge fans of vest packs for cycling. Realistically, all of the models we tested are great in their own right, so finding the best option for you comes down to choosing the one that best suits your riding style, water and gear carrying needs, and budget.

The packs we’ve tested are a great starting point, but they are just the tip of the iceberg. There are plenty of other options, so if you’re looking to “invest” in a hydration vest, do a little research, and hopefully you can find your perfect match.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dirt Rider
Dirt Rider
4 days ago

Is that last photo from the TdF aka the Truckee Dirt Fondo? Also, why no Camelbak Chase vest on test?

Jeremy Benson
Jeremy Benson
3 days ago
Reply to  Dirt Rider

Dang, good eye. Yes, the last photo is moments after finishing the TDF in 2024. It was super hot that day, and the vest was clutch. I considered the Camelbak Chase, as it looks like a solid pack, but I already had 5, and wasn’t trying to make this an exhaustive list of vest packs. I’ll ultimately get my hands on the Camelbak Chase and review it separately or update this article with another model or two over time.

Andy
Andy
3 days ago
Reply to  Dirt Rider

I’m a fan of the CamelBak Chase – it fits well and doesn’t bounce too much. It could have a little more capacity but for shorter rides of 2 hours or less, it does the trick. It’s also affordable and frequently on sale which is a nice aspect to it as well.

Joe Lee
Joe Lee
3 days ago

FWIW, USWE markets that as a pack, not a vest. They do make an actual vest though – the Rush. I use a Camelbak Chase (found cheap in REI re/supply) and was sad not to see it included. Still, excellent, and thorough, article!

NREsq
NREsq
1 day ago
Reply to  Joe Lee

Right; the Outlander is really just for short mtb rides, hikes, etc. If I’m using a “vest” its because I need storage/hydration capacity for the length of time I’ll be riding that otherwise doesn’t fit in frame bags/bottles on the bike. That’s not what the Outlander is for.

TypeVertigo
2 days ago

Timely article/review. Was hoping you’d take a look at Osprey’s Escapist Velocity series, as it’s fairly under-represented in terms of hydration vest reviews by independent media.

Jeremy Benson
Jeremy Benson
2 days ago
Reply to  TypeVertigo

In my experience, Osprey makes quality gear. I’ll add the Escapist to the shortlist of packs for the next round.

NREsq
NREsq
1 day ago
Reply to  Jeremy Benson

Right; not sure why you didn’t choose at least 1 Osprey and 1 Camelback, 2 of the best and most popular brands, rather than a couple of the relatively obscure brands on test.

Ghostship Matt
Ghostship Matt
1 day ago

I purchased a Camelbak Chase (Adventure 8 version) earlier this year and am fairly disappointed with it. I find the fit to be awkward – the straps feel like they’re wedged under my armpits unless I really pull the chest straps tight. This awkwardness gets worse the more stuff you have in the front pockets. Speaking of: the front pockets are barely large enough to fit a standard sized Pixel 9 phone (the zipper doesn’t close all the way), and if you’re interested carrying anything larger than several gels, make for a tight fit. The remaining capacity in the pack section gets pretty cramped when the reservoir is full. The snaps that close over the hydration hose and close the flap on the pack section are a confusing design choice, as is the lower chest strap – it’s stretchy so it never really gets snug enough. I much prefer using my older CB MULE pack instead. I would highly recommend trying one on if you can before purchasing to be sure it works for you.

NREsq
NREsq
1 day ago

Why choose the Outlander XC from USWE? Its the least expensive on test and one of their smallest choices. For another $30 on Amazon you can get a USWE model with a 3 liter bladder (which need not be filled to capacity) and up to 6 liters of internal storage, which for me is perfect for a 5 hour race/ride. Nothing beats the X harness for adjustability and sizing. Its comfortable and secure and easy to forget you’re wearing a larger capacity vest. Check anywhere from Unbound to Belgian Waffle and you’ll see far more USWE vests than anything else. Because they just work.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.