Home > Feature Stories

Cannondale Revives Jekyll Mountain Bike, Creates New ‘Over Mountain’ Category

Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More


Cannondale has pulled one of their models back from history with the all-new 2011 Jekyll all-purpose mountain bike. In the process, they’ve created yet another new category in the increasingly stratified mountain bike world: Over Mountain.

Not content with the assumed compromises between climbing and descending capabilities that ‘All Mountain’ implies, Cannondale wanted to convey the Jekyll’s abilities by putting it into a category that illustrates what they claim it can do well: Get you over the mountain; from climbing up one side to bombing down the other, and do it all better than any other bike out there.

To do this, they’ve created an entirely new frame design, some very nice features and collaborated with Fox Racing Shox to develop the world’s first “two in one” rear shock. It’s an ingenious design the uses two completely seperate damping circuits for compression, rebound and two separate air chambers…one each for climbing and descending.

Jump in for full details…

Updated 5:34pm EST June 23: Text has been proofed and finished, and many more photos added. Full ride report and tech breakdown of the shock’s inner workings coming later as separate posts.

Not seen since around 2002, the new Jekyll replaces the Moto as their long travel “all mountain” bike, though they won’t call it that. The new model uses Japanese-made military-spec ballistic fibers, constructed with a high-impact, hot melt resin that’s also used in baseball bat manufacturing…so it’s made to take repetitive high impacts and resist crack propagation. The 2011 Jekyll uses high modulus carbon sparingly because it’s brittle and more suited to road and XC bikes.

BallisTec Carbon Technology
Made in Japan, the ballistic carbon fiber used in the Jekyll is military spec, used in anti-ballistic equipment, and Cannondale has to sign off and account for every kilo of fiber. In fact, Cannondale’s Murray Washburn, global product marketing manager, said you could take a hammer and smack the frame hard and there would be no damage. One of their German engineers has even taken a hatchet and hit the downtime and it didn’t break the fibers. The goal with all of this was to create a carbon fiber frame that would remove the doubts and fears of those that say carbon has no place on long travel, all-mountain…er, Over-Mountain… bikes.

By using BallisTec fibers, they’ve creates a carbon frame that’s lighter and stronger than aluminum and more dent resistant than steel.

SmartFormed Alloy Tech
For those that can’t afford the high end carbon versions, there’s the SmartFormed Alloy Jekylls. The frames have identical frame shapes to the carbon versions, which is done with a mix of butted, hydroformed and box-sectioned tubes.


Rear Dropouts
Both carbon and alloy versions are hollow, either via custom layups of carbon or shaped box section aluminum. The derailleur hanger is a “sandwich” design that slides around both sides of the dropout. Cannondale says this is stiffer than traditional single side mounted hangers and improves shifting performance with the new 10-speed drivetrains.

The alloy linkage is only 8g heavier than carbon version.


BB Shell and Front Derailleur
The bottom bracket area uses an aluminum shell with ISCG03 guides on both the carbon and aluminum frames. In the carbon models, the aluminum BB is co-molded into the frame. The front derailleur is a direct mount design that’s built onto the swingarm directly at the pivot. Cannondale says they went with ISCG03 rather than 05 because it’s lighter but still lets you run a chainguide.

Superwide main pivot axle is as wide as an iPhone is tall.
Superwide main pivot axle is as wide as an iPhone is tall. The frame design accommodates a full size bottle.

Center Stiffness
Cannondale tested competing frames and found that the ones that tested stiffest in the lab didn’t necessarily feel the best on the trail; they didn’t transmit trail feel well. Peter Denk (pronounced ‘dank’), Cannondale’s direct of technology and resident carbon ninja, used this to develop the concept of Center Stiffness versus Frame Stiffness.

One of the central facets of Center Stiffness are the bearing and pivot designs. First, they used a double bearing rear pivot, just above the dropouts. Single bearing pivots have lateral movement between the balls and the sides of the bearings, which allow for flex before the balls hit the sides and “firm up.” With double bearings, you get cross braced stiffness.

Second, they improved stiffness by setting the shock pivot linkage bearings as wide as possible. Then, they looked at how the bearings in the linkage were contributing to frame stiffness. With typical designs, linkage bearings are sitting on an axle that runs through the frame, and the linkages simply sit on the bearings. Denk says the problem with that design is that the linkages can move independently of each other. Their solution? Clamp the linkage onto the axle. Now, both linkage pieces are tied together and move in tandem. On the 2011 Jekyll, this is done on all three, 15mm oversized axles in the pivot area…two on the linkage and one in the bottom swingarm pivot.

Denk says this translates on the trail into a bike that requires less steering input and finessing…it’ll track better and be more predictable.

Frame Deflection
With super stiff links creating a stiff central section and predictable movement, Denk was able to fine tune the frame’s flex and deflection. An absolutely stiff frame wouldn’t feel lively or mitigate chatter.

Result: ECS-TC
(Enhanced Center Stiffness – Torsion Control)


Pull Shock
The use of a pull shock eliminates stresses on the frame that are created by push shocks, makes room for a full size water bottle mount and allows for a straight seat tube, which means the geometry won’t change as your raise or lower your seatpost.


The shock is mounted near the BB, which actually equalizes forces when hitting a bump. WIth a normal push shock, not only is your weight pushing down on the bottom bracket, but the shock is, too. With the pull shock, the shock forces are pulling up on the BB, offsetting some of the forces put on it by your body weight. Also, because there’s not as much force being put on the BB area, they don’t have to overbuild the rest of the downtime just to counter shock forces.

Lastly, it sits really low for a lower center of gravity, which makes the bike more maneuverable.

The piston shaft pulls up. Our prototype shocks were all one-off, hand built with aluminum shafts. Production models will have steel shafts.

Dual Shock
DYAD RT2 is billed as the “World’s first true 2-shocks-in-1 SuperShock.” It’s a collaboration between Fox and Cannondale. It’s two completely distinct shocks in one body. There are two air settings, two compression settings and two rebound settings. When Cannondale initially approached Fox, they said “no way.” But C’dale’s persistence paid off. Fox agreed on the condition that they could design the damping.

I’ll do a separate post about just the shock, but suffice to say that it matches the rebound damping and compression damping to the different air springs, using separate circuits for both sides of the shock. The main chamber, when pushed/compressed, pushes oil into either the “Elevate” or “Flow” chamber such that only the appropriate rebound and compression circuits are used. On other current dual shock designs, oil flows through both circuits simultaneously, meaning it’s trying to match both short- and long-travel types of damping.

– optimized for climbing and rolling terrain
– 90mm travel
– small volume air spring
– steep siring rate
– XC damping circuit
– sag cut by 40% (22% sag recommended)
– high BB, steep seat angle
– more efficient pedaling, better traction and handling for XC / climbing

– 150 mm travel
– optimized for aggressive descending
– softer spring rate- DH damping circuit
– large volume air spring
– full sag (36% sag recommended)
– low BB / Slack, stable geometry
– plus, long travel
– coil like response
– optimized body position and handling for descents

When the lever is pushed down (left), it's in Elevate mode. Click the black release lever and it springs back into Flow mode.

When switching from Elevate to Flow mode, BB height should drop about a centimeter and seat and head angle will change by about one degree.

By using two separate air shocks and circuits, you create a bike that has a Jekyll and Hyde personality…two totally different personalities to suit the type of riding you’re doing. It eliminates the need to over inflate your shock to accommodate handling then having to release air before the descent, which becomes a real pain if your trails consist of repetitive up and down sections. Essentially, it makes you faster in both climbing and descending, and it makes it more fun to do both.

The shock’s design has a large amount of surface area to help dissipate heat, which is aided by the fact that the oil chambers are in direct contact with the outside shell of the shock rather than running through the interior shaft like most XC-oriented shocks. This reduces (likely eliminates) any change in performance during long downhill runs.

Positive air chambers are filled simultaneously via Schrader valve, but they close off from each other when the pump is removed.

SVT (Stationary Valve Technology) – runs oil directly through separate compression and rebound directly through shims between the negative and positive air springs. In Elevate mode, you’re using the larger chamber, providing 90mm of travel. In Flow mode, oil is rerouted into the smaller chamber first through DH-tuned damping circuits, and oil pressure is equalized between the two chambers. The small air chamber in the shorter chamber is good for 60mm of travel. Add them together and you get the 150mm travel for bombing down the trails.

In order to achieve this design, a couple of small compromises had to be built in. First, the lever on the bar to switch is slightly hard to push, and that’s because they had to use firm springs to control the column inside the shock that switches oil flow between the Elevate and Flow chambers. The second is that, while rebound damping is set separately for both chambers, letting you fine tune the shock’s performance in either mode, you need to be sure that both are at least partially open. The other is that in order to get the spring rates Cannondale and Fox wanted for the bike, the shock runs higher pressure than normal and each bike gets a special shock pump. Positive air chamber pressures will be between 300 and 400 psi.

Progressive Linkage
The DYAD shock, like most air shocks, gets progressively firmer as it compresses. Cannondale designed a little more progression into the linkage design. It’s designed to move the shock’s shaft slower initially and speeds it up the further it moves into its travel. The result is more progressive damping and compression, keeping it from bottoming out or blowing through its full travel on major drops of huge square edged hits.

The 2011 Jekyll’s design follows in Cannondale’s tradition of System Integration by creating a frame and shock together. One of the interesting aspects of the design is their control of the rebound damping in Flow mode. When the bike drops into something big and compresses deep into its travel, the initial rebound is a bit slower to control the speed at which the bike rises back up. This prevents having the rear end bounce back too hard and buck you forward. Some riders have slowed down their rebound before big descents to accomplish this, but that results in slower rebound even over the small stuff, which can keep the shock stuck halfway in its travel over rough terrain. The dual flow rebound damping circuit and linkage ratio design solves this by keeping rebound quick over the small stuff and controlled in the big hits and drops.

In Elevate mode, they’ve eschewed a lockout in favor of a controlled but active suspension that keeps it moving quickly in the very first part of its travel. This improves traction and (Cannondale claims) conserves effort, but there’s still a bit of pedal platform built in, which can be fine tuned by adding or subtracting air pressure from the negative chamber.


Top Tube
Massively oversized at the front, splits to a “double clamp” at the seatpost to keep it stiff.

Yes, there should be a bolt in that top mount hole.

Rear Brakes and Axle
The Jekyll has a custom offset rear brake mount. This was necessary to keep the brakes in line and still use the double bearings in the dropout, which had to be set a little wider. The bike uses the new-ish X-12 142mm rear axle size, but an adapter kit will be offered to run normal 135mm wheels if you’ve already got a nice set of hoops.


Top four models will use a Fox TALAS fork to allow for matching travel adjust. Europe will get Terralogic forks, U.S. gets the RLC. (Why? Because Euros are more into the enduro style riding that has more XC-type pedaling, whereas the intended user in the U.S. is likely to be more gravity oriented. They’ve gotten a lot of requests from riders wanting this bike for events like the Megavalanche and similar). Fox 15mm QR front with straight 1.5″ headtube and steerer on all.


The carbon models from L to R: Jeckyl 0 (Ultimate), 1 and 2.

Jekyll 0 Ultimate – 25.4lbs:, SRAM XX/X0 10spd, Hollowgram SL BB30, Crank Bros Cobalt custom wheelset, Reverb, Tubeless Nobby Nic
Jekyl 1 – 26.7lbs : SunRingle black flag pros, FSA afterburner cranks, XT/XTR 3×10, REverb
Jekyll 2 – 27lbs: SRAM X9/X7 3×10, TALAS RL w/ custom threshold lockout for more supple movement, FSA afterburner cranks.

The aluminum models from L to R: Jekyll 3, 4 and 5. The 3 and 4 are shown in the "wild" paint schemes and are also available in the black/white/red of the 5. The 5's wild paint scheme involves some bright orange.

Jekyll 3 – 29.4lbs: (alloy), FSA cranks, XT 3×10, TALAS RL
Jekyll 4 – 30.5lbs: x7/x9 9speed, Fox 32 Float RL (no T/A), Truvativ Fire-X 3.3 crankset
Jekyll 5 – 30.9lbs: x7/x9 9speed, Fox 32 Float RL (no T/A), Truvativ Fire-X 3.3 crankset, generally cheaper spec elsewhere.

Frameset available in both alloy and carbon models.

More Photos

Note that the alloy version’s frame shaping is very similar to the carbon’s. Cannondale says this is the closest they’ve ever made them look and the results are pretty impressive.













This little guy is the sag and travel indicator. Production bikes will have a decal or imprint that shows percentage markers, and the little tab on the frame pushes the gold bit clockwise as the rear end compresses, showing you how much travel you’re getting. Weight weenies, don’t sweat: It’s removable.





Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
13 years ago

Cannondale’s marketing department utilized new technology. On this one. Not content to simply “Jump the shark” but in fact “jump up one side” and “down over the other side” of the shark. That’s a whole new category of BS-ing.

Bike looks cool. Marketing and “Over Mountain” category? Gimme a break!

13 years ago

Looks like Denk just built Cannondale a Scott Genius with a Fox rear pull shock, wonder if he will re-use all the technology he created 5 years ago or if he will bring something new to the table. He is a brilliant guy, I just hope he keeps pushing forward and not just making Cannondale Scott frames.

13 years ago

So they invented the Scott Ransom?

Greasy Monkey
Greasy Monkey
13 years ago

Just looks like another Scott Ransome, doesn’t it? Okay, an “Over Mt” ……………….what’s that??

Carolina Guy
Carolina Guy
13 years ago

Any of the new GT, Mongoose or Schwinn bikes at the Cycling Sports Group dealer/press show? Are you doing a story about any of those bikes.

13 years ago

Will any of these modele be fitted with a lefty? Thanks

Kristi Benedict
13 years ago
Reply to  TLO

TLO: No, Cannondale doesn’t make a Lefty with that much travel, and even though they say the Lefty is strong enough for such “over” mountain riding, there’s still a mental block against the odd looking fork among many riders. Thus, they went with Fox forks to help broaden the appeal or, rather, not turn anyone off from the bikes. Plus, they worked pretty heavily with Fox on the rear shock design.

13 years ago

this bike is sweet there is no denying it. i wonder how long they have been working on it for? the new shock must have taken some time.

13 years ago

This bike is an EVOLUTION, not a COPY. Just because it has a PULL instead of a PUSH shock. Consider all the work done to bring the shock/linkage forces into the frame to control them. This will probably be my third (cool coincidence) Cannondale. The Prophet ruled the rainforest in Juneau for four years. I look forward to a more capable bike. Second gear semi-trials riding up steep techy stuff demands durability, sub-28 pounds, and a head angle closer to 69%. I’ve tried slowly popping up onto a park bench, and general technical riding at 67%, and at 69% (the two options on the Prophet) , and with the 67% angle, terrain is harder, or impossible to clean.

13 years ago

Why is Cannondale so polarizing???????

13 years ago

Nice bike, I´m thinking of getting one but I was wondering if it would be possible changing the 150 mm fork for a 160 mm fork???

13 years ago

thanks man!!!

12 years ago

Hey eduardo – I am picking one up with a 170 mm fork – thought it would be funky but it rides like a dream – whole bike is 28 pounds built to descend – amazing!

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.