Home > Other Fun Stuff > Actual Weights

First Ride: Kona makes the Process 134 DL even more ‘Shore worthy, includes new Shimano N/W rings

7 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More
Kona-Ride-2017-8329
Photo c. Caleb Smith/Kona

The day after getting a chance to check out Kona’s new Hei Hei Trail DL, we had time for one more ride. This year was the first that Kona held their dealer event in Squamish, BC, which meant prime access to some of the best local trails right out the front door. For obvious reasons, this seemed like the perfect opportunity to check out the revised Process 134 DL. Built with similar travel numbers to the new Hei Hei Trail, the ride would serve as a back to back comparison between two similar but very different bikes on some of the exact trails they were created for…

Proces 134 2017 Kona mountain bike full suspension review actual weight (5)

Proces 134 2017 Kona mountain bike full suspension review actual weight (8) Proces 134 2017 Kona mountain bike full suspension review actual weight (7)

Based on outward appearances, the 2017 Kona Process 134 DL doesn’t appear to be much different than the 2016 model. It still offers 134mm of rear travel mated to a 140mm fork and uses Kona’s Rocker Independent Suspension platform. The frame is still a 6061 butted aluminum number with a carbon brace between the rocker arms.

Proces 134 2017 Kona mountain bike full suspension review actual weight (9) Proces 134 2017 Kona mountain bike full suspension review actual weight (1)

Stealth dropper compatible, the cable routing is a blend of internal and external with a fully external rear brake line. Straddling the PF92 BB shell you’ll find ISCG 05 mounting tabs as well as a low direct front derailleur mount – both of which were absent on the Hei Hei Trail.

Kona process 134 dl 2017 geometry

The biggest change comes in the form of geometry with Kona adding length to the reach – up to 25mm more for the XL (XS remains the same). All sizes also see a longer front center measurement and slightly longer wheelbases. The head angle also slackens by 1º and the seat tube angle steepens by a half degree. All of the changes are said to make the Process line even more capable and in line with modern trends without resorting to a Boost rear end.

IMG_5768

The aluminum build of the Process 134 DL is responsible for a big chunk of the weight difference between it and the Hei Hei Trail DL, but the Process also features a burlier build that hints towards the bike’s rowdier nature. The 30.71 lb (13.92kg) weight includes tubes and fairly aggressive Maxxis tires with a Minion DHF EXO Dual TR 27.5 x 2.3 front and Tomahawk EXO Dual TR 27.5 x 2.3″ tire on the back.

Proces 134 2017 Kona mountain bike full suspension review actual weight (10)

IMG_5743 copy

Proces 134 2017 Kona mountain bike full suspension review actual weight (1)

Considering that there was a lot of climbing to kick off the ride, I was pretty happy with the Shimano SLX crank with a 30t chainring. Look closely and you’ll notice that this is the first narrow/wide Shimano ring that we’ve been able to ride (or see for that matter). Based on the drops and jumps the drivetrain was subjected to, the chainring functioned well enough that I didn’t realize it was anything different over the course of the ride. Shimano may have had to swallow a bit of pride when it comes to narrow wide chainrings, but it appears they have done their homework.

Proces 134 2017 Kona mountain bike full suspension review actual weight (2)

Proces 134 2017 Kona mountain bike full suspension review actual weight (3) Proces 134 2017 Kona mountain bike full suspension review actual weight (4)

Kona-Ride-2017-8358 copy

On the climb up Jack’s and 50 Shades to the entrance of Rupert, the extra heft of the Process 134 was noticeable compared to the Hei Hei, but the bike still pedals well. It doesn’t inspire XC race confidence like the Hei Hei Trail, but with a flip of the levers on the suspension you can sit back and pedal without any drama to the top. In reality this seems more in line with the spirit of the bike anyways. Its true calling is blasting down at mach chicken while it will gladly pedal to the top – if you have to.

Along those lines, when it came time to drop in on some of the bigger North Shore features, the changes in geometry were right at home. The Hei Hei Trail was perfectly capable of handling the same lines, but the Process allows you to drop in with more confidence that you’re going to stomp the line. Having two bikes with such similar numbers may seem like an oversight, but it’s surprising just how different the two feel. The Hei Hei Trail is a trail bike that you could race XC on, while the Process is a trail bike that you could do bike park laps on.

Both are insanely fun, but one will probably fit in better with your riding style and needs. Or your budget, considering the Process 134 DL is just $3,599.

Kona-Ride-2017-8348
Riding photos c. Caleb Smith/Kona

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Old fut
Old fut
8 years ago

Nice drop in on that rock with the little ladder. I walked it!

TheKaiser
TheKaiser
8 years ago

The bike looks nice, but whats up with Shimano going narrow/wide?

They’ve been showing those extra tall tooth rings for a while now, insisting that narrow/wide isn’t needed and may perform worse from a friction and wear perspective…and then they drop a narrow/wide all of a sudden on SLX?

Also, I had heard SRAM recently started enforcing their narrow/wide patent. Maybe they started because Shimano was getting into it, but clearly that hasn’t deterred Shimano, or maybe they worked out some kind of licensing exchange with certain desirable IP from each other, but that would be unheard of for those 2 companies.

Belgmeister
Belgmeister
8 years ago
Reply to  TheKaiser

From what I understand, SRAM only has patent on the “+” shape of the wide tooth, not the actual narrow/wide aspect of a chainring.

TheKaiser
TheKaiser
8 years ago
Reply to  Belgmeister

I didn’t realize that, thanks for the info!

Seraph
Seraph
8 years ago

Man, what is up with all these companies specc’ing KMC chains on Shimano drivetrains? KMC makes great chains but Shimano cassettes work way better with Shimano chains.

Jeb
Jeb
8 years ago

Shimano and it’s Japanese management style is going to kill that company. The inability to react quickly and the insular tiered management system will see these guys continue to lose market share on the MTB side as new companies like BOX show up. Have you seen their OE spec, it’s dwindling every year. Hello, 1X is here….like 5 years ago.

Jeb
Jeb
8 years ago

Oh and that new Dura-Ace group, the only guys I know who are going to upgrade from 9000 are the guys that get it for free through the race teams.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.