Home > Bike Components > Tires

New Maxxis Dissector Tires Roll Fast and Offer Reliable Traction Beyond Their Intentions

Maxxis Dissector tires, SF, cornering
5 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

During Crankworx Whistler this summer, I picked up a pair of Maxxis’ updated Dissector tires for testing. Typically, I would ride more aggressive treads like Maxxis’ Assegais/Minions, so I was curious to see how the lesser-lugged Dissectors would handle my area’s steep and technical terrain.

The new Dissectors are designed to excel in dry, hardpack conditions, but due to their launch timing, I did my testing throughout the fall. Consequently, I wound up riding these tires on everything from fairly dry dirt to slick wet roots and rocks. I am pretty impressed with the Dissectors – They’re an ideal option for those who want a faster rolling MTB tire without sacrificing much in terms of traction.

Maxxis Dissectors – Construction Features:

Maxxis Dissector tire, tread

For complete details on the second-generation Dissector tires, check out our launch article from earlier this summer. Maxxis didn’t change the Dissectors’ intentions with this update; they simply sought to make some improvements. The tread design was redesigned to offer better traction while cornering and braking, without giving up their rolling speed.

Categorized as a trail/enduro tire, the Dissector’s tread is not front or rear-specific, so it can be run in either position (or both, as I did for testing). Maxxis suggests pairing a Dissector front with a faster-rolling rear for shorter travel bikes. For longer travel trail/enduro bikes, the Dissector makes an ideal rear tire matched with a more aggressive front tread. The Dissector performs best on 30-35mm wide rims.

Maxxis Dissector tire, front on bike

To improve their cornering feel, Maxxis spread out the Dissector’s triple row center knobs so they cover the transition zone better. They also enlarged and reinforced the side knobs to improve cornering traction. The sipes on all the Dissector’s knobs were also updated.

Model Lineup:

Maxxis Dissector tires, CWX display

At this point, the new Dissector is available in 29×2.4” sizes only, but Maxxis does intend to offer more options in the future. As for casings and compounds, Dissectors are available with EXO, EXO+, and DoubleDown casing options. Most models offer either 3C MaxxTerra or 3C MaxxGrip compounds, but Maxxis includes one EXO model featuring their Dual compound as well.

Maxxis Dissector EXO on scale

Listed weights for the 29×2.4” options range from 950g (EXO/Dual) to 1205g (DoubleDown/MaxxGrip). My scale showed my EXO+/MaxxGrip tire at 1050g.

Maxxis Dissector DoubleDown on scale

My DoubleDown/MaxxGrip tire weighed in at 1160g (45g less than claimed!).

Ride Impressions:

Maxxis Dissector tires, SF, slab

My first ride with the Dissectors was an October day offering nice grippy dirt, dry rocks, and slightly slippery roots. Not surprisingly, the Dissectors roll faster and easier than the knobbier treads I’d typically ride on my home trails. My long travel trail bike didn’t suddenly feel like an XC race machine, but the difference was appreciable.

The Dissectors aren’t super lightweight tires, but if you’re used to aggressively knobby tires like me, you’ll save a little weight with them. The Dissectors only beat out the pair of Continental Kryptotal tires I recently tested by 140g. 

Traction and Braking:

Maxxis Dissector tires, SF, climb, rocks

On my first couple of rides, I noticed the rear tire would slip out on a climb more easily than a knobbier tread if you shift your weight off the tire too much. Tires like Maxxis’ Minion DHR or a Continental Kryptotal Re (two I’m familiar with) are definitely better at maintaining grip when you’re not perfectly planted over that back wheel.

But, while the difference was noticeable right after swapping treads, I quickly got used to the Dissectors. On recent rides, my rear wheel has been reliably holding traction during climbs, even in the rain. I’m not treading carefully with these tires either; I’m just cranking along as usual, and as soon as they felt familiar, I had no ongoing issues with slippage.

Maxxis Dissector tire, muddy

Though I didn’t get to do much testing on truly dry hardpack conditions, it was apparent that the Dissectors offered the best traction on dirt. Whether dry or damp, this fall offered plenty of grippy dirt to ride, and the Dissectors tracked through it really well. When the dirt was really ideal, the Dissectors provided very solid traction, and I felt firmly planted to the trail. Even as the weather got wetter and muddier, I remained impressed with the Dissector’s grip. I never once washed out a wheel riding these tires, and as I mentioned about climbing, I was not riding conservatively! I assure you, I rode full tilt with absolute confidence in the Dissectors.

Now there are areas where deeper treads undeniably shine, like loose deep dust, sloppy mud, loam, etc., and in those scenarios the Dissectors’ shorter lugs aren’t going to match a more aggressive tire. Overall, I’m still very impressed with the Dissector’s traction, especially in conditions they weren’t designed to excel in.

Maxxis Dissector tires, SF, rocky trail

As for rooty terrain and rock slabs, the Dissectors were pretty good. I think Maxxis’ 3C MaxxGrip compound can take credit for providing better than expected grip on dry or slightly damp rocks, and they did handle damp roots pretty well, too. Again, I can say I never had any sudden slip-outs while bombing damp technical trails.

Braking on wet rock slabs was one area I’ll say the Dissectors weren’t great. I slid my rear wheel down one familiar slab unexpectedly, but to be fair, these tires are designed for dry conditions. It seems the Dissectors’ smaller knobs can’t distort and conform to the surface of a rough rock like taller lugs can. The lugs also don’t offer much surface area, so there’s not a ton of rubber to contact smoother slabs.

However, the better the dirt gets, the better the Dissectors’ braking performance becomes. With nice grippy oatmeal-like dirt, these tires dig in quite well and slow you down pretty effectively. That grip reduces a bit when conditions are drier (or slick and muddy), but I wouldn’t say braking was weak on any kind of dirt. I do suspect that if I tested these tires mid-summer, they would not match something with bigger lugs in loose, deep dust.   

Cornering Grip and DoubleDown Sidewall Support:

Maxxis Dissector tires, SF, climb, corner

I should note I never got to ride the previous Dissector tires, but apparently, they lacked traction while transitioning into turns. Maxxis said they addressed this issue with the updated design, and it certainly seems they did. The new Dissectors actually stood out to me by offering a very smooth and predictable transition as you lean into a corner.  

Spreading out the center knobs was a smooth move from Maxxis, as I enjoyed reliable traction at all lean angles. I did not feel any lack of grip while rolling from the center knobs to the side lugs. Their solid grip in dirt, good rolling speed, and super smooth cornering make these tires a riot to ride on flowy trails!

Maxxis Dissector tire, hot patches

I chose to ride a pair of Dissectors with an EXO+ casing for the front tire and a DoubleDown casing for the rear. Being a 140lbs rider EXO+ casings are substantial enough for me, but I wanted to see how much more support and rim protection the DoubleDown casing would offer on my rear wheel.

After all my rides, I can only recall a couple of times I heard concerning knocks on the rear rim (none of which caused damage). In terms of cornering stiffness and support, I’d say the Dissector’s DoubleDown sidewall is pretty comparable to Continental’s Enduro sidewalls; Tough enough that I never felt any side roll while pushing through corners, but not as stiff-feeling as a DH tire.  

Maxxis Dissector tires, rear on bike

MSRP for the Maxxis Dissector 29×2.4” EXO+/MaxxGrip is $104, while the DoubleDown/MaxxGrip model sells for $116.

Will there be a 32″ Maxxis Dissector soon?

Maxxis seems to be the mainstream tire brand leading the 32″ charge, and it appears this might be the first proper trail bike tire to make the jump to 32″ based on an unlabelled tease at DT Swiss’ Craft Bike Days show. We’ve reached out to Maxxis for comment, and as usall, they are tight lipped stating, “we can’t share anything too detailed about our plans, but there’s a lot in the works for next year.”

maxxis.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sirclimbalot
Sirclimbalot
2 months ago

If this is not available in 32 in, forget it.

Daan
Daan
2 months ago

p[rices are insane!!!
go with Wolfpack, half the price, 200+ gr lighter en perfect grip

McDörben
McDörben
2 months ago
Reply to  Daan

I’m not a big fan of Maxxis either. But in my experience they all communicate well we’re as every of the three Wolfpack tire models I’ve tried works fine until a sudden loss of grip happened. Sometimes not even in demanding situations. They are faster no questions but the gripp is a coin toss

will
will
2 months ago
Reply to  Daan

never used these and im not sure if its a joke – the tires are cheap and decent but these from the picture alone do not seem to have multi compound or proper DH sidewall support.. then the tread pattern… maybe they make good trail tires – but that’s the 2010’s trail, not today’s “really its enduro” that dissectors, dhf, etc. in double down or dh offer.

And i hate maxxis pricing too. Heck, i dont use maxxis. but they arent.. bad.

natrat
natrat
2 months ago

new dissector came fitted on my bike, it sucked. It never felt particularly grippy and made me nervous tipping it into corners. Replaced with a kenda double black, better, now i am not always thinking about the back letting go too easily

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.