Home > Other Fun Stuff > Prototypes & Concepts

32″ MTB Tires are the Next Big Thing at the Taipei Show

Maxxis Aspen 32 inch prototype tire taipei show
31 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Get ready. It looks like a new tire size might be lurking around the corner. OK, not so much new as finally gaining some momentum. Both new 32″ tires and rims have been spotted at the Taipei show, hinting that even bigger MTB wheels may be here soon.

The 32″ wheel size dates back at least to 2014, when Walmart of all brands introduced a cruiser with 48 spoke, 32″ wheels and knobby cruiser tires.

Just a few years later, DirtySixer showed off a prototype with 32″ wheels – going smaller than their typical 36″ wheeled monsters for NBA players and the like. A year later at NAHBS, DirtySixer showed off 32″ road and gravel bikes built by Ventana USA. Sourcing high-quality tubeless tires seemed to be one of the main bottlenecks, and it wasn’t until 2024 that we saw gravel bikes with custom DirtySixer VeeTire T-Monster 32 x 2.4″ tires mounted to the brand’s own double-wall alloy rims.

Vee Tire Co. has always been impressively fast to work with builders like DirtySixer to introduce custom tires. But when a brand like Maxxis shows off a prototype, it tends to raise an eyebrow or two. Before we get too excited, we should point out that our source at the Taipei Show has been told that the 32 x 2.4″ Aspen XC tire shown in Taipei is a hand-built prototype and that production molds have not been opened. That doesn’t mean it won’t happen, but it’s important to point out that Maxxis isn’t producing these just yet.

Aside from brands like DirtySixer making bicycles for the exceptionally tall, the rumor is that certain XC or gravel race teams are asking for the bigger tires so they can test them compared to 29″. Just like the promise of 29 x 27.5″, the bigger 32″ wheels and tires would have better roll-over and a bigger contact patch than 29″, but there would be an obvious weight penalty and slower initial acceleration.

Is that enough to justify opening new molds and tooling? That remains to be seen, but you know that racers are going to do everything possible to gain an edge, even if it means running comically large wheels.

32″ Rims, Too

You can’t run 32″ tires without a 32″ rim. While DirtySixer has been making their own, a few other brands have shown off 32″ rims at the Taipei Show. OEM supplier Jet Set Rims had a wide, low-profile aluminum rim at their booth, which allowed for a comparison between 29″ and 32″ rims.

As you can see in the pictures, it’s a pretty substantial difference. Throw some tires on there, and then it’s really apparent.

In addition to the Jet Set Rim, the Maxxis tire itself was mounted to an unmarked carbon fiber rim. We’d assume that if XC or gravel racers are interested in the 32″ tires, this is also the rim they’d be interested in.

32″ Frames & Forks?

Assuming that XC racers would be testing out 32″ wheels and tires, they’d need appropriate frames and, most likely, suspension forks. Prototype frames can be built pretty easily, but the forks will likely require collaboration with a major suspension manufacturer to make custom prototypes.

Or, they could use an existing fork like the inverted fork from Wren that DirtySixer uses for their 32″ MTB builds. Wren doesn’t show 32″ as an option for their fork on the website, but it clearly can be done with the right chassis and tuning.

Are 32″ Mountain Bikes Coming?

Outside of the extremely tall, it seems like a bit of a stretch to introduce an entire new wheel size. Then again, maybe there is more demand for bigger wheels and bigger bikes than we’d guess, and this is just the start?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tim
Tim
27 days ago

Making 32″ suspension fork prototypes is only hard if you use modern one-piece leg and arch castings. You could easily make a prototype without any investment in molds by using a press fit CNC arch, like on 90s Manitous for example.

Philipp
Philipp
26 days ago

I would personally like to see bigger wheels for cross country instead of the common trend to longer travel in this area. At least worth a try given the minor improvements that would otherwise maybe be possible.

Tim
Tim
26 days ago
Reply to  Philipp

I think at some point we will just reach something like an optimum. The idea that bikes will keep improving indefinitely to me seems flawed. As does the idea that it’s more enjoyable to ride a bike that’s faster. For example, I don’t have more fun on my 2021 full suspension 29er than I do on my hardtail 26er from 2003.

Nobody
Nobody
18 days ago
Reply to  Tim

But how much faster can I go?

mrvco
mrvco
26 days ago

Wow, my quiver of 29ers seems so inadequate now. Please save me from these feelings of inadequacy Bicycle Industry and sell me a new quiver of 32” wheeled bikes.

nooner
nooner
26 days ago

I’d hit it.

Exodux
Exodux
26 days ago

I don’t see 32″ wheels in my future but think that more choices are better than less choices. For taller riders, I think this is a step in the right direction, for the rest of us, including my 6′ self, maybe not.

Alex
Alex
26 days ago

Innovation keeps the bike industry alive. Unfortunately, I won’t partake. 29” wheels are already pretty big.

MTB Biz
MTB Biz
18 days ago
Reply to  Alex

I’m liking my 32/29 mullet and I’m 5ft 7
For a size comparison
32/29 is the same difference as a 29/26 mullet

Last edited 18 days ago by MTB Biz
David
David
26 days ago

While I’ll take the fact that myself and many others were wrong about 29″ wheels and that they wouldn’t work back in the day, they still don’t work on everything. At 5′ 8″ with a 31″ inseam, I’m as worldly average as they come. And with that, on mid to long travel 29″ wheel bikes, on steep stuff I’ve gotten my fair share of tire smooches on my behind, and moved mostly to mullet for anything 150mm or more of rear travel. In theory, I can’t actually roll a 32″ wheel and tire between my legs standing on the ground. So while it may work on XC and gravel bikes for 6ft+, getting deep into travel for anyone, even on a short travel bike is going to get a lot of people who have never experienced a Exo casing enema a very real introduction to almost getting tossed over the bars on a steep that shorter people have gotten for years. Even if they sort out the geo this time out of the gate, how many people can really successful navigate around a tire of this diameter?

Tim
Tim
25 days ago
Reply to  David

All this is true, but the front wheel is a different story. I ride a bike with a 31″ effective diameter (29×3.0), and the improvement in the ability to plow over obstacles is very real. I could also throw on one of the two 3.25 tires out there and gain another half inch of height on the front wheel.
I also have the same wheel diameter on the rear, am 5’11” or so with average proportions and have not had the tire buzz my rear end, even when I ride steep stuff (admittedly nothing crazy). The scenario of standing over a wheel and rolling it between your legs is not in my view one that is representative of a real-world situation.
Personally, I think 32″ is worth exploring if performance gains are what one is after, but I don’t care about that kind of stuff. There’s a lot to be said for keeping what you have and saving thousands by maintaining it with parts that keep getting cheaper over time.

Monty
Monty
25 days ago

but… but… what about my 32″ Fatbike? where’s my 32×4.5’s?

Last edited 25 days ago by Monty
Calvin
Calvin
25 days ago

Can’t wait for pick and mix mullet setups.

Original mullet = Squashinga 27.5 into your front fork and running 26 out back
Mullet = 29 and 27.5 out back.
New mullet = 32 up fron on your 29er.
Super mullet = 32 fork upgrade on your 27.5 hardtail – just think of the extra fork offset!
Real men do full core mullet running a 26 out back and 32 up front though.

Oh wait 32 wheels are noodly, are we going to play with hub standards again?!

Deputy Dawg
Deputy Dawg
24 days ago
Reply to  Calvin

You DO realize that they make 24” wheels and knobby tires, don’t you?! SUPER-DUPER MULLET (aka modern day penny farthing).

ranggapanji
ranggapanji
24 days ago
Reply to  Deputy Dawg

don’t forget that 20 x 2.35″ BMX knobbies exist. 32″/20″ mullet, a.k.a. Cleetus.

MTB Biz
MTB Biz
18 days ago
Reply to  Calvin

150mm fat hub and it’s not noodly

Rik
Rik
25 days ago

So we already forgot about 750d and moving on to the next step up? This would be 800e then?

Sevo
Sevo
24 days ago
Reply to  Rik

750d never made it to production. Even then, that was a proposed new gravel standard. Not MTB

Sal
Sal
24 days ago

I guess. Pretty happy w/ my 29rs

King County
King County
24 days ago

I was going to joke that I can finally get some replacements for my worn Walmart 32″ tires, but I searched and see unicycle.com has 32″ tires and rims.

sirbikealot
24 days ago

i’ll wait for 30.5″s 😉

GreenPlease
GreenPlease
24 days ago

Seems like to accommodate these wheels and mitigate toe overlap frames will need shorter chain stays, longer front centers, steeper seat tube angles, shorter cranks, and (maybe) lower BBs. I’ve ridden 29×3.0s (Trek Full Stache… bring it back) and the additional ability to just plow through stuff was very real.

Del
Del
23 days ago

 the bigger 32″ wheels and tires would have better roll-over and a bigger contact patch than 29″,

.. only has a biger contact patch Vs 29″ if you lower the pressure. P=F/A.

Xzarterius
Xzarterius
23 days ago

The weight in the wheelset, tires, fork and frame would dramatically increase. This is just more propaganda/ marketing hype to get people to buy more trash that isn’t any better than anything it would replace. If the bike market doesn’t wake up soon, there won’t be one left. Lower prices, less proprietary items and more customization is what we need. Not more “best thing ever” gaslighting to the masses.

Liam
Liam
21 days ago

Slower acceleration, more rotational inertia, and an even weaker wheel because of the longer spoke lengths? Sign me up!

MTB Biz
MTB Biz
18 days ago
Reply to  Liam

Mullet mode works well 32/29
Next step for me is a custom geo, lower stack height, steeper STA

But for a straight 32in bike, you can always go to a 12 speed with a 54T cassette (aerozine);and a 28t or 30T chain ring to compensate

ed llorca
ed llorca
21 days ago

2 day late april fools….

Super Dave
Super Dave
21 days ago

I can’t help thinking a road bike with 700c front & 750d rear would roll better. On rougher surfaces a 28 mm rear tire should work really well. (I know UCI rules are a problem)

Ron Taylor
Ron Taylor
21 days ago

what about road bikes? are the tires similar to the 32s or smaller like 28s?

MTB Biz
MTB Biz
18 days ago

I did a Bolany invertered 140mm fork with a Vee T-monster tire mounted on Nextie CF hoop/hope fat hub.

The wire bead tire is still heavy.
Tried to lighten it up with a 29er TPU tube, but it doesn’t really stretch like rubber.
I ended up doing a butyl 29er tube(Goodyear) with 48mm presta valve.
Smaller length presta tubes won’t be long enough to fit through hoop.

jam
jam
13 days ago

This might be the only thing that would get me buying a retail priced full bike atm, come on downcountry FSer

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.