Home > Bike Types > Road Bike

SRAM Red AXS adds massive pro-sized chainring options, sold only with powermeters

larger pro chainring sizes for sram red 12-speed road bike chainrings
24 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

When SRAM launched the new AXS road bike groups, they introduced new gearing patterns and chainring combinations to optimize the ring-plus-cassette ratios. But the largest officially available double chainring was a 50/37.

Their sponsored pro teams, however, wanted more. So SRAM was making custom combinations with bigger gears. UCI rules, however, state that anything the pros are running needs to also be available for sale to the public…or at least heading toward production.

So, SRAM is adding three new Red eTap AXS 12-speed double chainring sizes to the lineup. Here’s everything you can now get:

ORIGINAL
46/33T
48/35T
50/37T

NEW
52/39T
54/41T
56/43T

sram red etap axs powermeter chainrings are integrated into a single piece

These new combinations are only offered for aftermarket, not OEM, and will only be sold with the integrated Quarq powermeter spider. Which means they’re part of SRAM’s power meter exchange program (50% of replacements) since the power meter and chainrings are built into a single part.

Retail prices are MSRP: $1,349/ €1300*/ £1160 (*includes VAT), which sounds expensive…it’s a $150 premium over the original Quarq-equipped chainrings. That’s because they come with a special two-position eTap AXS front derailleur to handle the taller gearing.

If you were building a bike from scratch, and you wanted monster gearing, that’s actually a bit of a deal since the front derailleur normally runs $400.

Available starting March 24, 2021.

SRAM.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Woody
Woody
3 years ago

lollololol – old habits die hard

Involuntary Soul
Involuntary Soul
3 years ago

sram realized no one wants to uses 10t

None Given
None Given
3 years ago

I may be mistaken, I think it was physics that said no one SHOULD want to use the 10.

breakwind
breakwind
3 years ago

Interesting how shimano and campy are both now using 10t as well

Onrhodes
3 years ago

So they kinda/sorta/maybe admit that their original chainrings were not ideal. As lots of people have pointed out they certainly were not as efficient.

threeringcircus
threeringcircus
3 years ago

“…that’s actually a bit of a deal since the front derailleur normally runs $400.”

Crash Bandicoot
Crash Bandicoot
3 years ago

Not a sram guy in the slightest but that’s sort of the going rate for electronic front derailleurs, Dura-Ace di2 front mechs are like $50 cheaper that being said prefer di2 way more than eTap even in its current iteration.

Tony P.
Tony P.
3 years ago

$50 with no power meter. Granted, i do not want or care about power meters but at least if you pay for a tire rotation, they’ll change your oil for free.

Thesteve4761
Thesteve4761
3 years ago

No 60?!

Hard pass.

Chris
Chris
3 years ago

I don’t like the idea of a 10 either. But until SRAM starts to make 12 speed 12-28 or 12-32 you are stuck with the small front chainrings as well if you want to be able to use the full range.

Involuntary Soul
Involuntary Soul
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris

the only reason they made 10t mandatory was to force their XD free-hubs down everyone’s throat so ppl are stuck with using SRAM only

None Given
None Given
3 years ago

Who,?12 speed systems are not exactly brand dependent at the rear end…..

fitness
fitness
3 years ago
Reply to  None Given

Interesting Shimano and Campy both are doing 10t as well

Johann
Johann
3 years ago

Does this mean it’s a disposable power meter?

Demetri Alexander Mamacos

Now you know why the bunch travels so much faster these days. The gearing has caught up with the aeroness

BlackInferno
BlackInferno
3 years ago

The best is 10t haha

EATRIDEGROW
EATRIDEGROW
3 years ago

It would be nice if SRAM would serve their customers instead of themselves.

Nick
3 years ago

I’ve got the standard 48/35T on my bike with the 10-33T. I only top out when I get to +75km/h. So unless you are racing I just can’t see why anyone would need the larger chainrings. If I have any complaint it’s being limited to 33 on the back (20% grades are common where I live).

satanas
satanas
3 years ago

Further evidence that SRAM is taking the wrong drugs, though I guess 56×10 might be useful with 16-20″ wheels…

Daniel
Daniel
3 years ago

Isn’t the next Dura Ace supposed to have 10T as well?

Andrew
Andrew
3 years ago
Reply to  Daniel

Presumably Shimano Dura Ace 12-Speed will have a 10T as well….but somehow everyone will be OK with Shimano doing it….its only a problem when Sram does it. (As evidenced by the fact that noone cares that Campy does it too on their 13-Spd.

nightfend
3 years ago

Oh…look my chainrings have worn out. Yep, time to toss my powermeter as well.

cogs
cogs
3 years ago

What about shimano and campy who also use 10t on various groups and likely more coming?

TimE
TimE
3 years ago

LOL exactly

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.