Home > Bike Types > Gravel Bikes

Surly Launches a New Straggler, and It’s Not Your Grandfather’s Gravel Bike

New Surly Straggler hero(Photos / Surly)
17 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

It’s been a long time since I regretfully sold my Surly Straggler, but man, I really loved that bike. It did it all, and did it with aplomb. For the most part, the Straggler has been left pretty much untouched for many years. But Surly has just launched a new version, and it looks better than ever!

New Surly Straggler first pic
(Photos / Surly)

Surly is using the word performance to help describe this generation Straggler. The brand’s definition of the word performance isn’t how most would define the word. Surly says, “Performance is how a bike shows up and holds up when shit gets rough.” I can get behind that definition.

The Straggler is ready for any gravel, minimum maintenance roads, and light bikepacking. The bike could easily be a quiver killer, as it’s actually designed to handle being your only ride.

The New Surly Straggler mine
Grandfather’s, my Straggler, 10 years ago, as a basket bomber!

My straggler was a great bike that I miss very much. It could be anything I needed it to be. The new Straggler is the same type of bicycle, but this time around is much more refined for the rider. It’s got a more dialed-in fit range and comfortable geometry. It also now runs with front and rear thru-axles and modern flat-mount brakes.

The Surly Straggler is down for anything. Surly says it can be the ultimate day-tripper, cross-terrain explorer, or boundary-pusher. The Straggler’s abilities can wander into light cargo scenarios, pulling double duty as an errand runner and hitting the trails on the way home.

Straggler’s New Features

  • Geometry, wheel size, and tubing are optimized to hone that Surly steel ride feel
  • Dropper post capability for when the downhills throw you a wild card
  • Thru-axles front and rear for more precise handling
  • 50mm tire clearance for a confident ride on busted terrain
  • A 44mm head tube and flat mount brakes make it easier for you to Make It Your Own (MIYO)
  • 650b or 700c wheels (varies by frame size) for optimized rider fit
  • Racks and fender mounts, plus two standard and one three-pack bottle mounts on all frames
  • Updated thru-axle dropouts for improved stiffness and handling
  • Modern flat-mount brake mounts, internal dropper routing, and 44mm headtube
  • Lower bottom bracket and sloping top tube add stability and better standover height
  • 50mm tire clearance w/o fenders on 700c for confident, comfortable riding on eroded terrain
New Surly Straggler drive train

Straggler Retail & Frame Specs

Retail: $1,999 (complete), $899 (frameset)

You can get a new Straggler thru-axle fork if you like, for only $135

Colors: Subtropic Algae and Shaggy Carpet (coming soon)

  • Frame Construction: 4130 Chromoly, Natch tubing, double-butted main triangle, TIG welded, E.D. coated
  • Fork Construction: 4130 Chromoly, Natch tubing, TIG welded, brazed lugs, E.D. coated
  • Suspension Fork Length (Travel): 436 x 51mm (40mm)
  • Fork Offset: 44mm
  • Axle to Crown: 650b (Size 46–52): 390mm, 700c (Size 54–64): 410mm
  • Rear Spacing:12 x 142mm (Axle included)
  • Front Brake (Rotor): Disc – Flat Mount Fork 140/160 (160mm max)
  • Headset – Upper: ZS44/28.6
  • Headset – Lower: EC44/30
  • Front Spacing: 12 x 100mm (Axle included)
  • Steerer Tube: Ø28.6mm (1-1/8″)
  • Crown Race: Ø30mm (1-1/8″)
  • Stem Clamp: Ø28.6mm (1-1/8″)
  • Seatpost: Ø27.2mm
  • Dropper Post Compatible: Yes, internal
  • Seatpost Clamp: Ø30mm
  • Front Derailleur Clamp: High band clamp or braze-on with adapter bottom-pull (Ø28.6mm) 47CL
  • Bottom Bracket: 68mm threaded (1.37″ x 24TPI)
  • Crankset (Max Ring): Single ring, 47mm chainline crankset: 46T, Double, 47mm chainline crankset: 50/34T
  • Bottle Mounts: 2 Standard + 1 Three-Pack
  • Fork Mounts” Rack mounts – upper, lower, and mid-blade threaded
  • Front Fender Mounts: Yes
  • Rear Fender Mounts: Yes
New Surly Straggler performance

Geometery

surly-geo-drawing-gravel-2000x1505 Large
Size46 (650b)49 (650b)52 (650b)54 (700c)56 (700c)58 (700c)61 (700c)64 (700c)
A. Effective Top Tube500.0520.0540.0555.0570.0585.0605.0630.0
B. Stand Over682.0716.0746.0779.0807.0830.0857.0895.0
C. Reach363.9362.9365.3391.4389.1392.5403.5419.5
D. Stack507.9530.4554.0570.7591.6610.6639.1667.7
E. Total Seat Tube Length390.0430.0460.0490.0520.0545.0570.0620.0
F. Headtube Length90.0110.0135.0120.0140.0160.0190.0220.0
G. Headtube Angle70.071.071.071.572.072.072.072.0
H. Seat Tube Angle75.073.572.574.073.072.572.572.5
I. BB Drop62.062.062.072.072.072.072.072.0
J. BB Height277.0277.0277.0285.5285.5285.5285.5285.5
K. Chainstay Length416.0416.0416.0435.0435.0435.0435.0435.0
L. Fork Length Axle to Crown387.5387.5387.5407.6407.6407.6407.6407.6
M. Fork Offset44.044.044.044.044.044.044.044.0
N. Wheelbase984.4982.1992.61033.61033.21042.71063.01088.3
Crank Arm Length165.0165.0165.0170.0170.0170.0170.0170.0
Handlebar Width400.0420.0440.0460.0460.0480.0500.0520.0
Recommended Rider Height147.0 – 157.0155.0 – 165.0160.0 – 170.0166.0 – 177.0173.0 – 183.0179.0 – 189.0184.0 – 194.0193.0 – 203.0
Stem Length70.080.090.090.0100.0100.0100.0110.0
New Surly Straggler big tire clearance

Check the link below to see if the new Surly Straggler could be your next bike.

SurlyBikes.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rodegeek
rodegeek
7 days ago

Good changes. Tall riders: note the 64cm size.

Grillis
Grillis
6 days ago

At this point, not going with UDH seems like a major fail here. I’m not even a sram guy, but this would deter me.

David
David
5 days ago
Reply to  Grillis

I agree… It’s a shame the UDH ends up looking so ugly, but that hasn’t stopped them with the beer barrel of a head tube!

Dinger
Dinger
5 days ago
Reply to  Grillis

How would UDH meaningfully improve a bike like this? Doesn’t seem like the kind of thing a purchaser of an economical steel frame would care much about.

Space Raccoon
Space Raccoon
3 days ago
Reply to  Dinger

UDH: Very easily available replacement hangers, no special order required, plus bonus of running T-type drivetrains if desired. There really isn’t a downside either.

James
James
6 days ago

Why bother changing it… Sorry I’m not sold.. As an owner of two bikes… One a surly cross check and a Genesis longitude, The Surly straggler was my next dream bike… But not this iteration. It’s had all character stripped away.. Maybe I’ll go for a velo orange polyvaylent instead.. Or a second hand straggler.. This looks boring and generic.

Der_kruscher
Der_kruscher
2 days ago
Reply to  James

The idea of any Surly being an object of lust is a weird one to me: their beauty IMO has been that you could assemble a versatile bike from sh_t you had laying around in your garage without compatibility issues. At their best, Surly frames would allow you to dip your toes into a cycling discipline without ending up with a one-trick-pony: that’s what made the original Cross Check and LHT so good – those bikes were pretty unique when they came out and I think did a better job at fulfilling Grant Petersen’s dream than Rivendell on all counts except aesthetics. Otherwise, Surlys aren’t anything special: heavy tubing, inoffensive geometry, meh looks, and just ok ride with some negatives like their way-too-short headtubes and quirky dropouts that weren’t all that great in practice. Thru axels and flat mounts have been around long enough that appropriate wheels are pretty easy to find cheaply used, so that’s definitely a win over the past dropouts on this bike. Surly influenced the industry enough that they’re not the only, best, or most interesting option…still fine bikes, and pleasantly free of stuff like internal cables, but there’s other companies making this stuff now too.

Der_kruscher
Der_kruscher
6 days ago

I’ve owned several Surlys over the years and enjoyed them: this looks good, but the 44mm headtube with steel fork is ugly. I get why they spec it as they do, and it’d likely be considered off brand, but it would be nice if Surly offered a reasonably priced carbon for with the same measurements as the stock fork for those owners who want one.

David
David
5 days ago
Reply to  Der_kruscher

Yeah it looks terrible! I wonder what the REAL reason is… I can’t see it being stronger, given Ritchey doesn’t prefer them, so is it just a case of it’s cheaper for them to use the same head tube across models?

Der_kruscher
Der_kruscher
4 days ago
Reply to  David

Surly has always been all about being as compatible with as many components as possible, and from that standpoint the headtube makes sense: it’ll work with tapered forks and straight steerers. Finding a carbon fork with a straight steerer and thru-axels for flat mounts is challenging (just bought one for my All-City Super Pro), particularly if you’re looking for a certain rake and A-C measurement. Surly had to decide between aesthetics and maximum compatibility and they went with the latter.

WheelNut
WheelNut
4 days ago
Reply to  Der_kruscher

Unicrown forks are almost always a bad idea (aesthetically)- especially when paired with a 44mm HT. The proportions are just all wrong. Unicrown isn’t too bad on an MTB where the crown is super duper wide, but for road and gravel it just looks weird. Sure unicrown is light, easy to build, and should have good ride quality, but gosh darn it- its not pretty! The old bike with the 36mm HT and cast fork crown looked good.
44mm HT is a more common HT standard now, so I can see the draw to go that way, but its just not really a good match for a straight 1-1/8″ steerer bike. The HT is way to large and look wonky. Plus the HT is super heavy and then you should pair the giant HT with a giant down tube, which means, ideally, a ultra thin wall tube (0.4mm). Ultra thin wall tube is hard to work with, easy to dent, and difficult to process in a low cost production facility. So, it’s not really a good fit for a Surly, which should be durable and inexpensive.
The 44mm HT is not a bad choice for the largest frame sizes, but its just mega overkill on the smaller frames, but when you are spec’ing a production frame you don’t want to use different headset across different sizes as that makes sourcing more difficult to manage.
So, in conclusion bike design is a set of trade offs. Choose which trade off you want to take. This thing probably rides better than the old bike- stiffer and more responsive, but doesn’t look as good. Can’t have it all at this price point.

David
David
5 days ago

So, still no reason to replace my Cross Check!! Which, let’s face it, is a big problem for us in the bike trade today…. Yeah bikes often perform ‘better’ year on year, but they’re not getting any more interesting or exciting.

LGonBR
LGonBR
5 days ago
Reply to  David

Pricier too, no?

Brian
Brian
5 days ago

I don’t think my grandfather had a gravel bike

Astro_Kraken
Astro_Kraken
5 days ago
Reply to  Brian

I actually saw a pic of my grandpa in maybe 1919/1920 on a trike on a gravel road in MN.

The trike had less toe overlap than this bike.

allison
allison
3 days ago

Too bad the nice fork crown is gone. I don’t like the unicrown fork on the Midnight Special either. I still say the Cross Check was the best bike they ever made.

dr_lha
dr_lha
2 days ago
Reply to  allison

Every spacer manufacturer agrees with you about the Cross Check.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.