Home > Other Fun Stuff > Racing News

UCI Says No Restrictions on Wheel Size, Allows 32-Inch Wheels In Races Next Season

A BMC team rider on the prototype BMC 32" bike.Titouan Carod riding BMC's prototype 32-inch-wheeled XC bike earlier this year. (photo/Max Schmid)
18 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Without a doubt, one of the biggest stories of 2025 is 32-inch wheels. We’ve been talking about them quite a bit ever since the Taipei Show, where Maxxis was showing off a production version of its Aspen XC tires in the 32-inch size. After that, it was as if the floodgates opened, and we’ve seen various production and prototype frames, handmade bikes, wheels, and other parts made specifically around the 32-inch wheel size. A few frame manufacturers and XC racing teams were even seen test riding 32-inch-wheeled bikes, and surely most others are designing and testing theirs behind the scenes.

But with all the hype that 32 has been getting, one thing that hasn’t been made clear is whether or not the bigger hoops would be allowed in World Cup XC races. As we know, the UCI makes rules about the gear that cyclists use in international competition, often imposing restrictions on things like handlebar width or gearing. And, until just recently, it was still unclear whether 32-inch wheels would be banned or allowed in UCI mountain bike racing.

The Faction Bike Studio 32-inch prototype at Eurobike this year.
The Faction Bike Studio 32-inch prototype on display in the Maxxis booth at Eurobike. (photo/Zach Overholt)

Our friends at Mountain Bike Action were the first to report on the UCI’s decision to allow 32-inch wheels in competition. In that article, they quoted the UCI’s Communications and Media Relations Senior Manager, Fabrice Tiano, as saying, “The mountain bike commission always considered mountain bikes as the laboratory of cycling with very limited rules regarding equipment. That is the reason why 32-inch wheels will not be banned in mountain bikes.

For further confirmation, I reached out to an acquaintance associated with the UCI. They told me, “32 is good to go. No restrictions on wheel size. MTB has always enjoyed the freedom of innovation. We have all benefitted from it.” They were also quick to mention that, “Of course, all of the safety measures and certifications are the same as other wheel sizes.”

The day after this piece was initially published, I also got a follow-up message from Charlotte at the UCI Press Office. She stated “that the use of 32” wheels is permitted, however, the UCI and the UCI Mountain Bike Commission are closely following the developments of the technology.” While it was not expressly stated in her message, I speculate that this means that the UCI will be paying close attention and potentially adjusting its stance on 32-inch wheels to ensure both fairness and rider safety.

A rider riding on the BMC 32 inch prototype
Titouan Carod on the BMC 32 prototype. We’re looking forward to seeing 32-inch bikes between the tape next year. (photo/Max Schmid)

So, essentially, XC teams and racers have the green light to race 32-inch-wheeled bikes in UCI-sanctioned MTB events next season. But the bikes will obviously need to be tested and receive all the applicable certifications to ensure the safety of all riders. So, we probably won’t see anybody racing chopped-up frankenbikes, but it’s fair to assume that quite a few frame manufacturers and teams will be testing and racing certified 32ers next season.

I know I’m excited, and I think it will be very interesting to see how this all plays out. It’s easy enough to speculate how 32-inch-wheeled bikes might perform and the advantages/disadvantages they could have on the race course. But now we’ll get to see firsthand as brands, teams, and racers take to the trails and go head-to-head with the current crop of 29-inch bikes. Will 32-inch wheels actually be the next big thing? Will they stick around or ultimately get banned for providing an unfair advantage? I guess we’re going to find out.

I also think it’s safe to assume that this announcement will only help accelerate the already rapid pace of 32-inch product development. In the coming months, I anticipate seeing numerous new production forks, frames, wheels, tires, stems, and other components for the 32-inch wheel size. We’ll be watching the market closely and will do our best to keep you updated with all the new gear.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Exodux
6 days ago

I’m not sure this 32″ wheel movement will gain traction without a major fork manufacturer coming onboard, at least in the major racing scene.
I haven’t heard any news of Fox, Rockshox, Ohlins, etc, coming out a 32er fork.

Jeremy Benson
Jeremy Benson
6 days ago
Reply to  Exodux

I agree that it will take team component sponsors making 32er forks before we see many racers on them. With all the hype around the new wheel size, though, I’ve got to imagine that the big players are already well into the development phases of some 32 forks. I also recognize that product development can take a long time, but we’ve also seen some pretty quick turnaround on prototype 32er frames. I don’t know, I’m fairly tall, so I’m here for it if it happens.

Doug B
Doug B
6 days ago
Reply to  Exodux

I’m sure the press releases from fork manufacturers will have plenty of techie sales talk, but really is it that hard to lengthen the uppers of a fork by 1.5″?

Sailmeister
Sailmeister
5 days ago
Reply to  Doug B

Likely needs to be wider, and the forces generated by a bigger wheel will need to be taken into account. then of course there’s the amount of travel.

Shredder
Shredder
5 days ago
Reply to  Doug B

It’s more the lowers that need to be reconfigured, the bigger wheel would hit the crossbrace.

Mr. P
Mr. P
5 days ago

Hey it’s the 27.5 to 29 hype to product pipeline getting primed. 32″ is probably faster in XC racing. But is it fun? Cuz if it’s faster, media will tell you how important it is. Now about those now-too-narrow boost hubs… can’t have too much flex in the wheel – but that will be the 2027 topic. 2028 will be: how much speed can you gain on a DH race bike? But back to the fun part. Can media please add the fun factor into the hype machine?

RoDe
RoDe
5 days ago

My main concern is that, A) Smaller riders, may simply be too short to ride these bikes. Will we have special races for riders who simply don’t fit? B) Another wheel size? This seems like another cash grab from the manufacturers. Which will require you to upgrade everything. Frame, wheels forks etc.

Jeremy Benson
Jeremy Benson
5 days ago
Reply to  RoDe

Re: your main concern, I got a follow-up from someone at the UCI press office, which stated “that the use of 32” wheels is permitted, however, the UCI and the UCI Mountain Bike Commission are closely following the developments of the technology.” I take this to mean that they’ll be monitoring it closely, and possibly adjusting their stance if it proves to provide an unfair advantage (based on rider size or other factors). I also added that info to the article this morning.

Eggs Benedict
Eggs Benedict
4 days ago
Reply to  RoDe

The answer to concern A), ride a smaller wheel size.

The weight difference between a smaller wheel, and especially the tire will probably not be insignificant. There is that advantage for the smaller wheel.

Marcel
Marcel
5 days ago

Whoohoo, another wheel size, So much marketing potential now everything needs to be stiffer. I can see hyperboost hubs, 37.5 mm handlebars, 1.75 inch headsets coming to you in the near future!
Yay…. Good luck bikeshops with your stock.

Joenomad
Joenomad
5 days ago

Why not go straight to 69ers.

\m/
\m/
5 days ago
Reply to  Joenomad

I usually go straight for the 69er

john
john
5 days ago

Not mentioned so far, wheelbases are going to grow with the increase in wheel size, and that’s to make lots of trails with tight swithbacks more difficult to negotiate, Gearing will also be affected, that 52 low gear on your cassette gets significantly taller adding an inch and a half to the radius of the wheel an tire…..think using at least 26-28th chainring to get a comparable low gear.

syborg
syborg
4 days ago

The UCI falsely claims that MTB always had freedom to innovate. Please splain why you made such a fuss over mixed wheel sizes.

nooner
nooner
4 days ago

I’m more excited about using 32″ wheels for gravel and road. MTB tracks can easily be designed with tech features like tight chicanes and jumps to help negate the 32 advantage.

Jon
Jon
4 days ago
Reply to  nooner

The smoother the surface the less difference wheel OD makes. May be better off with larger tyre casing?

Last edited 4 days ago by Jon
nooner
nooner
3 days ago
Reply to  Jon

It’s all about Average Speed my brother. At the end of the day it’s all about Average Speed, and 32″ wheels will prove out to be faster in most all cycling disciplines.

Jon
Jon
3 days ago
Reply to  nooner

Probably would be over a longer gravel or xc ride. Can’t see it making the difference on tarmac but for a long ride it’s probably no worse either, geometry considerations aside.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.