Home > Other Fun Stuff > Prototypes & Concepts

Sure, Canyon Lux Era XC Concept Bike is 32”, But Its Aero Wing Handlebar Is The Real Story

Canyon Lux Era aero 32" XC concept bike; cross-country mountain bike prototype with biplane wing handlebar(All photos/Canyon)
8 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

Canyon is teasing us with a new Lux Era cross-country bike this week at Eurobike that combines all manner of new tech. 32″ wheels, an upside down fork, an aero-optimized full-suspension race bike frame, and a next-level integrated aero ‘biplane’ cockpit. That last bit is what really makes this bike interesting, though…

Canyon Lux Era 32″ concept XC bike gets wild aero cockpit

Canyon Lux Era aero 32" XC concept bike; cross-country mountain bike prototype with biplane wing handlebar: front view

As XC racing speeds have increased – a 33% average speed boost on the World Cup in ten years, according to Canyon’s figure – there is more demand for aero optimization from the racers an their teams.

“In 2016, the average speed of XCO MTB World Cup races was 18 km/h. Today, it’s 24 km/h. Longer races are getting faster, too: the Leadville 100 MTB now sees winning speeds of 28 km/h.”

But outside of the skinsuits, aero helmets, shoe covers, and occasional repurposed aero gravel wheels we see in short track racing, there are relatively few truly aerodynamic optimizations done for Olympic-distance XC racing. Much like banned puppy paws on the road, we’ve seen racers resort to holding their fork crowns to get low & aero. Well, that is before the UCI cracked down on the unsafe practice of not holding onto one’s handlebars.

Canyon Lux Era aero 32" XC concept bike; cross-country mountain bike prototype with biplane wing handlebar: complete

Canyon’s answer… in this new ‘Era of Speed‘… just put the handlebar down at the fork crown!

Much like we saw with their innovative – if widely derided, and ultimately abandoned – double-decker gravel Hover bar, the simple idea here is to give riders & racers alike more hand positions. Stick with the conventional wide grips for technical off-road sections. Then, get your arms in and body low, by bringing your hands down to the lower section of the biplane handlebar, tucked-in next to the aero headtube but still securely on the handlebar to maintain bike control.

Canyon Lux Era aero 32" XC concept bike; cross-country mountain bike prototype with biplane wing handlebar: upright or aero rider position

Simply put, no. Or at least probably not. At least not yet.

Canyon admits that getting approval from the UCI will ultimately decide whether this concept works or not. And they haven’t even started that process yet. Right now, Canyon say that “athlete and wind tunnel testing is now taking place” to quantify how much time such a cockpit could provide.

But ultimately, their idea is to create a comfortable, secure place on the bar where racers can safely get more aero, without sacrificing control. My personal guess is that the UCI might only allow it if the rider could reach their brakes in these XC drops. After all, these are off-road capable bikes, even if the intention would only be to get super aero on the smooth paved or hardpack sections of an XCO course. While requiring brake control would certainly make this harder to implement, that could lead to further interesting innovation.

What other interesting tech is hidden in this Canyon Lux Era concept bike?

Canyon Lux Era aero 32" XC concept bike; cross-country mountain bike prototype with biplane wing handlebar: toptube view

The bar and wheelsize may be what first caught our eyes, but there’s more to this Lux Era concept.

First, the frame itself is said to be more aerodynamic, with a pointed aero headtube profile. Because, while ‘tweaking tube shapes’ isn’t the only answer, clearly there’s some ground to make up since most XC bikes have given little attention to aero optimization. The rear shock even is tucked inside the toptube out of the wind, but with a cutaway on top to make it easy to set up sag.

Canyon Lux Era aero 32" XC concept bike; cross-country mountain bike prototype with biplane wing handlebar: top cap cycling computer display

Next, even the fork seems to be more aero, with a thin crown design on this upside-down fork prototype.

Canyon also claims the upside-down promises better performance, pretty much like we’ve seen from every similar fork – “better fore/aft rigidity, better hard braking stability, reduced unsprung mass, better lubrication and sharper handling“. Maybe Canyon can help make the next upside down XC fork stick, whether that’s by lowering its price or just mainstreaming the idea again.

Canyon Lux Era aero 32" XC concept bike; cross-country mountain bike prototype with biplane wing handlebar: angled NDS

They even seem to have made your cycling GPS more aero, by integrating a round computer display directly into the top cap. Not sure how practical that round screen is, though. And, oh how proprietary it must be!

So when is the Canyon Lux getting the 32″ treatment?

Canyon Lux Era aero 32" XC concept bike; cross-country mountain bike prototype with biplane wing handlebar: non-driveside

I hate to be the one who keeps telling our readers that 32″ wheels are invading. But it seems that there’s no stopping them at the moment. And these bigger wheels dominate the bulk of new MTB development we’re seeing – certainly in the cross-country sphere.

Sure, Canyon just launched a new lighter, faster, more capable, and importantly 29″ Lux World Cup cross-country race bike less than two months ago. And rumor has it that another short travel 29er is coming soon, as well. But the fact that this concept bike features 32″ wheels is telling.

XC racers were already looking to get lower, and more aero on their current 29″ bikes. So this concept could have first debuted on a 29er. The fact that it is a 32″ bike highlights a few key points:

  1. First, 32″ wheels in XC racing are unavoidable at this point. A World Cup XCC short track podium over the weekend further cements their viability.
  2. The brand-new Lux WC may be 29″ today, but Canyon already admits that their athletes are testing new, bigger wheel concepts. And they’ll be testing this concept “over the next 12 months including racing or simulated racing situations“.
  3. The inevitable higher front end as a result of the top of the front wheel being a full 7cm (2.75″) higher off the ground (my own real measurement) means that a taller rider+bike combo is going to be difficult to avoid, even with dramatic negative stem angles. So, getting the rider more aero is likely going to be more important than ever on a 32″ XC mountain bike.

The XC racer’s perspective?

Canyon Lux Era aero 32" XC concept bike; cross-country mountain bike prototype with biplane wing handlebar: front angled

Wild aero handlebars aren’t quite ready for pro cross-country racing. And a 32″ Canyon Lux is most definitely not going to hit the consumer market this year. But it will not surprise us to catch a glimpse of a 32″ working prototype from any brand before the end of the season. The fact that Canyon is sharing this concept bike project with the world in midsummer, cements the idea that they are taking 32″ serious for XC racing.

“Whether it’s world cups or marathon races, riders constantly are figuring out how to go faster. Every second counts even more. Today’s cockpits only let you go so far. We need a solution that lets you get aero and comfortably stay aero.”

– Luca Schwarzbauer, Canyon XC Racing

Canyon.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ed LLorca
Ed LLorca
3 days ago

More product that ignores both standards and the customer. Handlebars are often the first takeoff on a new bike to suit the riders positioning and preference. Not gonna happen with those bars. It is garbage to me right there.

Mike I
Mike I
3 days ago
Reply to  Ed LLorca

It’s a concept, not a production bike. And I would argue that most bars aren’t removed.

nooner
nooner
3 days ago

Dylan Johnson would go!

Bill Palmer
Bill Palmer
3 days ago

What is “aerodynamic”?
Any object which has moving air acting upon it.
A table is aerodynamic. A sign board is. So are power lines. So is a box. So is a bicycle and rider.
You can’t have things being “more” or “less” aerodynamic. That is a misuse of the word.
Within aerodynamics there are finer definitions – used in aviation and motor racing but not, it seems in cycling:
Drag (and Lift – or downforce)

Drag is what cyclists are trying to reduce and it is subdivided into:
Profile drag, itself made up of Form drag, Interference drag, Skin friction and a few others.

The most relevant to cycling speeds is Form drag, which comes from the shape and area of a body moving through a fluid – air in our case. This is what position and fancy helmets influence. It also concerns rim and spoke design. And to a lesser extent square team radio boxes on the back. The turbulence caused to the airflow is what makes the drag. This study can be taken to ridiculous levels – QR lever position etc. but it all helps if only a tiny bit.

Interference drag can be caused where wheels pass through forks but especially where legs and feet are moving past frame, bottle, chainwheels etc. also upsetting the airflow.

Skin friction can be reduced by finish details – shoe design, attention to race number attachment and clothing material and fit.

All these things cause drag, measured in Newtons. The coefficient is called Coefficient of Drag CD. The calculation is 1/2 Ro x Vsquared x (frontal) Area.
Ro (Air density) we can’t do much about except choosing a hot dry day.
But it can be seen that an increase in V (speed) causes the drag to rise by the square of the increase.
Sooner or later you hit the wall.

The A – frontal area doesn’t matter at low speeds but makes a huge difference at faster speeds as the V squared kicks in . So when you see an electric biker sitting up like a mast and still going quickly, you can be sure that he is using up the battery fast. He is very “aerodynamic” – but very inefficient! He has high drag.

The body position is by far the most relevant item in reducing cycling drag. Looking at a set of forks and finding that they “look aerodynamic” is a bit far from the reality of relative drag sources. Maybe they look Low Drag…

Mike I
Mike I
3 days ago
Reply to  Bill Palmer

I agree, however, it’s marketing for people who never took much or any science beyond highschool.

Grillis
Grillis
2 days ago
Reply to  Bill Palmer

Pedantic much?

blahblahblah
blahblahblah
3 days ago

i want one!

Deputy Dawg
Deputy Dawg
3 days ago

Some cool ideas. Good to see a bit of thinking outside the box.

Reminder to support your LBS!

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.