Home > Bike Types > Cyclocross

Review: Easton EC90 SL carbon cranks are ultra light, plenty stiff

Easton EC90 SL carbon fiber crankset review
13 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

This summer, we put the brand new Easton EC90 SL carbon cranks on the scale and on the bike to bring you true first impressions as they were officially announced. Then, we followed up with a tech interview on their design and features. Now, after plenty of riding and moving them onto my ‘cross bike, I have some solid impressions.

The EC90 SL cranks bring Easton back into the crank business after a long hiatus by borrowing sister brand Race Face’s lightweight carbon fiber crank technology. The same methods that make the Next SL some of the lightest and strongest cranks on the market delivers the goods here, too…

Easton EC90 SL carbon fiber crankset review

The arms are stiff, but that’s usually not the weak spot when it comes to flex in the drivetrain. Fortunately, their 1x chainrings are also quite stiff thanks to an asymmetric, angular four-arm design. Even on the largish 42-tooth ring, I couldn’t feel or see any chainring flex under power.

Chain retention is also very good, but it seems to be so at the expense of added friction at the upper extreme of the cassette. As I have it set up, the chainline is virtually straight on the middle cog of an 11-speed cassette. On the largest cog, friction feels markedly higher in the system, and it drops off by half (going by feel) on the next cog down, with further reductions on through the middle of the cassette. I could not feel a similarly high increase in friction on the bottom end of the cassette, but it was smoother in the middle for sure.

Now, a caveat: This isn’t problem exclusive to Easton. I’ve felt the same thing on a completely stock SRAM CX1 group and on various mountain bike 1x narrow/wide chainrings, too. A very clean drivetrain helps, as does a fresh coat of wax lube. But, I can feel a slight bit more friction on the largest cog, though, compared to other 1x N/W chainrings I’ve tested. Not enough to lose a race, but it’s there. The upside? It’s not noticeable in the middle of the cassette, and I never once dropped a chain regardless of how hard I was smashing roots, racing rutted grass or wiping out. They’re also quiet.

Easton EC90 SL carbon fiber crankset review

The cranks themselves are beautiful. They’re boxier than their Race Face counterparts, with harder corners at the spindle. It didn’t hurt, but the pics below show how close they are to my shoes and ankles:

Easton EC90 SL carbon fiber crankset review

Click to enlarge and you’ll see that if you tend to ride ankle-in, you’ll probably be rubbing your shoes against the cranks. As much as I do this, though, the cranks aren’t looking as worn as some other carbon cranks I’ve tested. And, you can add the clear laminate offered by Race Face along with their crank boots if you wanna keep ’em looking new(er). Easton’s rep says the boots fit, but clearance with the chain can be very tight and worth checking before riding.

Easton EC90 SL carbon fiber crankset review

These are some well worn shoes, but worth showing what happens when you’re a chronic heel rubber. (It’s also a big endorsement for Lake’s shoes as they still look good after a couple years of use in MTB and CX!)

Easton EC90 SL carbon fiber crankset review

At first, these cranks were installed on the Parlee Chebacco using a Race Face PFBB30 bottom bracket, a set up that required no spacers. Once they moved to my Moots with a BBinfinite bottom bracket, I needed to use several of Easton’s spacers. That presented a problem of trial and error because the instructions that come with them (also available by download) do not show any possible combinations or suggestions. I tried them at first with only the large, shapely spacers, and then with an additional small spacer added. The first setup left too much play. The second felt good until half way through a ride when the crank arm almost fell off. The problem? It apparently only needs one small spacer, which I opted to put on the non-drive side in order to keep the chainline straight in the middle of the cassette.

Easton EC90 SL carbon fiber crankset review

That put the non-drive arm slightly further away from the chainstays, but it doesn’t feel awkward. It’s just visually off-putting once you notice it. Since that adjustment, I haven’t had to touch the cranks (and the BBinfinite continues to perform flawlessly). It would be nice if the instructions provided more detailed guidelines, but considering the wide array of BB’s out there, it might be difficult. You could always just get one of their Easton/Race Face bottom brackets and do without spacers altogether, too.

Minor setup quibbles aside, the cranks are fantastic. Easton says the narrow/wide tooth shaping is focused on reducing friction for larger diameter chainrings, and they offer up to a 50. So maybe their larger rings are a little smoother as the chain slides to the cassette’s extremes. I won’t know. I’m not going to push anything bigger than this 42 around a cyclocross course. For me, it becomes a slight tradeoff of incredible chain management for a tiny bit more friction on the largest cog, which I’m not using very often anyway. Considering that tradeoff comes in a sleek, incredibly lightweight and otherwise perfectly functional package, I’ll take it.

EastonCycling.com

SaveSaveSaveSave

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Seraph
Seraph
7 years ago

I have a set of the EC90SL cranks on my Jamis Nova Pro and I love them. Not only are they stiff and efficient, but they’re 300g lighter than the SRAM S350 cranks that the bike came with!

strikeir13
strikeir13
7 years ago

Was the testing done with a clutch rear derailleur? Curious how chain retention stacks up to other brands, with and without a clutch

patrick
patrick
7 years ago
Reply to  strikeir13

Bingo. Repeating that same test with a clutched derailleur that can be turned on and off definitely shows how much of that feeling is the derailleur.

Cam
Cam
7 years ago

How much load do you put in the bearings when figuring out your spacer issue? You mentioned with two spacers the crank arm came off. I have a similar set up and would like more detail if possible.

RobertW
7 years ago

518g with a 42 ring? The author needs to familiarize himself with what carbon cranks of the past 10 years have weighed. That weight is average.

aeroking
aeroking
7 years ago
Reply to  RobertW

perhaps you would like to provide some examples to support you claim?

RobertW
7 years ago
Reply to  aeroking

Sure. I have a 2010 FSA 5 arm SLK bb30 that is 390g without rings. You can get these lightly used for $100 and add a 1x ring to it.

aeroking
aeroking
7 years ago
Reply to  RobertW

BB30 crank will not fit a BSA BB like this crank will.

Greg
Greg
7 years ago

With the crank almost falling off, I must question the writer’s technical competence. Properly torqued, it will not fall off, unless there’s so much grease on the arm side of the spindle interface that you get hydraulic lock(!) or most of the load is being applied to an over-pre-loaded bearing due to too many spacers. Either way, you’d see and feel it before fully torquing the bolt.

dustytires
7 years ago

I too have noted what the author felt with chain line affecting perceived drag on all the new 1X drive trains, mtb and cx. setting the crank as far to left as shown in the photo does help. I was talking to the super knowledgeable guys at WolfTooth a few months back and their opinion is that 1X chainlines we are most familiar with are a couple mm’s too much,i.e., normal mtb with 49mm chainline can be improved if running 47mm, but any less than that and the chain may catch on the 2nd cog when in high gear. The shorter the rear end the worse the problem, so a CX bike like Tylers is worst case scenario.

tyler
7 years ago

wolftooth 42 here. on a CX bike with 430mm stays. Dura ace cranks. 10-40 xtr cassette on a spaced-out DTSwiss road hub. xtr clutch Rd. campy chain (supposed to be a bit narrower)

Theres sizable friction in gears one and two yet alot of metal-on-metal chafing noise in the lowest few gears. supposedly it’s a 47.5mm chainline.

TiAddict
TiAddict
7 years ago

I’ve got to say, I was going to phony up the dinaros, but those spacers are a nasty eyesore, not the mention the resultant sub-optimal chainline and pedaling offset (my steed, btw, sports a 68 BB30 shell). Easton should’ve have taken the Cannondale approach with detachable spindles. Real pity: offering a two or three lengths would’ve made all the difference. . .

Thanks the writeup!

TiAddict
TiAddict
7 years ago

In regards to the drag, I’d venture to guess the clutch derailleur is the culprit. When I switched my 1 x 11 from XTR derailleur to Ultegra GS (clutchless), the drag was gone.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.